Cargando…

Safety and Results of Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis in Patients with Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the dual interference between cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) and bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA). METHODS: Forty-three individuals admitted for CIEDs implantation were submitted to a tetrapolar BIA with an alternating current at 800 microA and 50 kHz freq...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Garlini, Luíza Matos, Alves, Fernanda Donner, Kochi, Adriano, Zuchinali, Priccila, Zimerman, Leandro, Pimentel, Mauricio, Perry, Ingrid Schweigert, Souza, Gabriela Corrêa, Clausell, Nadine
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7199980/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32369296
http://dx.doi.org/10.21470/1678-9741-2019-0098
_version_ 1783529249567670272
author Garlini, Luíza Matos
Alves, Fernanda Donner
Kochi, Adriano
Zuchinali, Priccila
Zimerman, Leandro
Pimentel, Mauricio
Perry, Ingrid Schweigert
Souza, Gabriela Corrêa
Clausell, Nadine
author_facet Garlini, Luíza Matos
Alves, Fernanda Donner
Kochi, Adriano
Zuchinali, Priccila
Zimerman, Leandro
Pimentel, Mauricio
Perry, Ingrid Schweigert
Souza, Gabriela Corrêa
Clausell, Nadine
author_sort Garlini, Luíza Matos
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To analyze the dual interference between cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) and bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA). METHODS: Forty-three individuals admitted for CIEDs implantation were submitted to a tetrapolar BIA with an alternating current at 800 microA and 50 kHz frequency before and after the devices’ implantation. During BIA assessment, continuous telemetry was maintained between the device programmer and the CIEDs in order to look for evidence of possible electric interference in the intracavitary signal of the device. RESULTS: BIA in patients with CIEDs was safe and not associated with any device malfunction or electrical interference in the intracardiac electrogram of any electrode. After the implantation of the devices, there were significant reductions in BIA measurements of resistance, reactance, and measurements adjusted for height resistance and reactance, reflecting an increase (+ 1 kg; P<0.05) in results of total body water and extracellular water in liter and, consequently, increases in fat-free mass (FFM) and extracellular mass in kg. Because of changes in the hydration status and FFM values, without changes in weight, fat mass was significantly lower (-1.2 kg; P<0.05). CONCLUSION: BIA assessment in patients with CIEDs was safe and not associated with any device malfunction. The differences in BIA parameters might have occurred because of modifications on the patients’ body composition, associated to their hydration status, and not to the CIEDs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7199980
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71999802020-05-08 Safety and Results of Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis in Patients with Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices Garlini, Luíza Matos Alves, Fernanda Donner Kochi, Adriano Zuchinali, Priccila Zimerman, Leandro Pimentel, Mauricio Perry, Ingrid Schweigert Souza, Gabriela Corrêa Clausell, Nadine Braz J Cardiovasc Surg Original Article OBJECTIVE: To analyze the dual interference between cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) and bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA). METHODS: Forty-three individuals admitted for CIEDs implantation were submitted to a tetrapolar BIA with an alternating current at 800 microA and 50 kHz frequency before and after the devices’ implantation. During BIA assessment, continuous telemetry was maintained between the device programmer and the CIEDs in order to look for evidence of possible electric interference in the intracavitary signal of the device. RESULTS: BIA in patients with CIEDs was safe and not associated with any device malfunction or electrical interference in the intracardiac electrogram of any electrode. After the implantation of the devices, there were significant reductions in BIA measurements of resistance, reactance, and measurements adjusted for height resistance and reactance, reflecting an increase (+ 1 kg; P<0.05) in results of total body water and extracellular water in liter and, consequently, increases in fat-free mass (FFM) and extracellular mass in kg. Because of changes in the hydration status and FFM values, without changes in weight, fat mass was significantly lower (-1.2 kg; P<0.05). CONCLUSION: BIA assessment in patients with CIEDs was safe and not associated with any device malfunction. The differences in BIA parameters might have occurred because of modifications on the patients’ body composition, associated to their hydration status, and not to the CIEDs. Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7199980/ /pubmed/32369296 http://dx.doi.org/10.21470/1678-9741-2019-0098 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Garlini, Luíza Matos
Alves, Fernanda Donner
Kochi, Adriano
Zuchinali, Priccila
Zimerman, Leandro
Pimentel, Mauricio
Perry, Ingrid Schweigert
Souza, Gabriela Corrêa
Clausell, Nadine
Safety and Results of Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis in Patients with Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices
title Safety and Results of Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis in Patients with Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices
title_full Safety and Results of Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis in Patients with Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices
title_fullStr Safety and Results of Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis in Patients with Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices
title_full_unstemmed Safety and Results of Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis in Patients with Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices
title_short Safety and Results of Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis in Patients with Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices
title_sort safety and results of bioelectrical impedance analysis in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7199980/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32369296
http://dx.doi.org/10.21470/1678-9741-2019-0098
work_keys_str_mv AT garliniluizamatos safetyandresultsofbioelectricalimpedanceanalysisinpatientswithcardiacimplantableelectronicdevices
AT alvesfernandadonner safetyandresultsofbioelectricalimpedanceanalysisinpatientswithcardiacimplantableelectronicdevices
AT kochiadriano safetyandresultsofbioelectricalimpedanceanalysisinpatientswithcardiacimplantableelectronicdevices
AT zuchinalipriccila safetyandresultsofbioelectricalimpedanceanalysisinpatientswithcardiacimplantableelectronicdevices
AT zimermanleandro safetyandresultsofbioelectricalimpedanceanalysisinpatientswithcardiacimplantableelectronicdevices
AT pimentelmauricio safetyandresultsofbioelectricalimpedanceanalysisinpatientswithcardiacimplantableelectronicdevices
AT perryingridschweigert safetyandresultsofbioelectricalimpedanceanalysisinpatientswithcardiacimplantableelectronicdevices
AT souzagabrielacorrea safetyandresultsofbioelectricalimpedanceanalysisinpatientswithcardiacimplantableelectronicdevices
AT clausellnadine safetyandresultsofbioelectricalimpedanceanalysisinpatientswithcardiacimplantableelectronicdevices