Cargando…

Optimizing the deployment of ultra-low volume and targeted indoor residual spraying for dengue outbreak response

Recent years have seen rising incidence of dengue and large outbreaks of Zika and chikungunya, which are all caused by viruses transmitted by Aedes aegypti mosquitoes. In most settings, the primary intervention against Aedes-transmitted viruses is vector control, such as indoor, ultra-low volume (UL...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cavany, Sean M., España, Guido, Lloyd, Alun L., Waller, Lance A., Kitron, Uriel, Astete, Helvio, Elson, William H., Vazquez-Prokopec, Gonzalo M., Scott, Thomas W., Morrison, Amy C., Reiner Jr., Robert C., Perkins, T. Alex
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7200023/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32310958
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007743
_version_ 1783529258781507584
author Cavany, Sean M.
España, Guido
Lloyd, Alun L.
Waller, Lance A.
Kitron, Uriel
Astete, Helvio
Elson, William H.
Vazquez-Prokopec, Gonzalo M.
Scott, Thomas W.
Morrison, Amy C.
Reiner Jr., Robert C.
Perkins, T. Alex
author_facet Cavany, Sean M.
España, Guido
Lloyd, Alun L.
Waller, Lance A.
Kitron, Uriel
Astete, Helvio
Elson, William H.
Vazquez-Prokopec, Gonzalo M.
Scott, Thomas W.
Morrison, Amy C.
Reiner Jr., Robert C.
Perkins, T. Alex
author_sort Cavany, Sean M.
collection PubMed
description Recent years have seen rising incidence of dengue and large outbreaks of Zika and chikungunya, which are all caused by viruses transmitted by Aedes aegypti mosquitoes. In most settings, the primary intervention against Aedes-transmitted viruses is vector control, such as indoor, ultra-low volume (ULV) spraying. Targeted indoor residual spraying (TIRS) has the potential to more effectively impact Aedes-borne diseases, but its implementation requires careful planning and evaluation. The optimal time to deploy these interventions and their relative epidemiological effects are, however, not well understood. We used an agent-based model of dengue virus transmission calibrated to data from Iquitos, Peru to assess the epidemiological effects of these interventions under differing strategies for deploying them. Specifically, we compared strategies where spray application was initiated when incidence rose above a threshold based on incidence in recent years to strategies where spraying occurred at the same time(s) each year. In the absence of spraying, the model predicted 361,000 infections [inter-quartile range (IQR): 347,000–383,000] in the period 2000–2010. The ULV strategy with the fewest median infections was spraying twice yearly, in March and October, which led to a median of 172,000 infections [IQR: 158,000–183,000], a 52% reduction from baseline. Compared to spraying once yearly in September, the best threshold-based strategy utilizing ULV had fewer median infections (254,000 vs. 261,000), but required more spraying (351 vs. 274 days). For TIRS, the best strategy was threshold-based, which led to the fewest infections of all strategies tested (9,900; [IQR: 8,720–11,400], a 94% reduction), and required fewer days spraying than the equivalent ULV strategy (280). Although spraying twice each year is likely to avert the most infections, our results indicate that a threshold-based strategy can become an alternative to better balance the translation of spraying effort into impact, particularly if used with a residual insecticide.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7200023
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72000232020-05-12 Optimizing the deployment of ultra-low volume and targeted indoor residual spraying for dengue outbreak response Cavany, Sean M. España, Guido Lloyd, Alun L. Waller, Lance A. Kitron, Uriel Astete, Helvio Elson, William H. Vazquez-Prokopec, Gonzalo M. Scott, Thomas W. Morrison, Amy C. Reiner Jr., Robert C. Perkins, T. Alex PLoS Comput Biol Research Article Recent years have seen rising incidence of dengue and large outbreaks of Zika and chikungunya, which are all caused by viruses transmitted by Aedes aegypti mosquitoes. In most settings, the primary intervention against Aedes-transmitted viruses is vector control, such as indoor, ultra-low volume (ULV) spraying. Targeted indoor residual spraying (TIRS) has the potential to more effectively impact Aedes-borne diseases, but its implementation requires careful planning and evaluation. The optimal time to deploy these interventions and their relative epidemiological effects are, however, not well understood. We used an agent-based model of dengue virus transmission calibrated to data from Iquitos, Peru to assess the epidemiological effects of these interventions under differing strategies for deploying them. Specifically, we compared strategies where spray application was initiated when incidence rose above a threshold based on incidence in recent years to strategies where spraying occurred at the same time(s) each year. In the absence of spraying, the model predicted 361,000 infections [inter-quartile range (IQR): 347,000–383,000] in the period 2000–2010. The ULV strategy with the fewest median infections was spraying twice yearly, in March and October, which led to a median of 172,000 infections [IQR: 158,000–183,000], a 52% reduction from baseline. Compared to spraying once yearly in September, the best threshold-based strategy utilizing ULV had fewer median infections (254,000 vs. 261,000), but required more spraying (351 vs. 274 days). For TIRS, the best strategy was threshold-based, which led to the fewest infections of all strategies tested (9,900; [IQR: 8,720–11,400], a 94% reduction), and required fewer days spraying than the equivalent ULV strategy (280). Although spraying twice each year is likely to avert the most infections, our results indicate that a threshold-based strategy can become an alternative to better balance the translation of spraying effort into impact, particularly if used with a residual insecticide. Public Library of Science 2020-04-20 /pmc/articles/PMC7200023/ /pubmed/32310958 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007743 Text en https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ This is an open access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) public domain dedication.
spellingShingle Research Article
Cavany, Sean M.
España, Guido
Lloyd, Alun L.
Waller, Lance A.
Kitron, Uriel
Astete, Helvio
Elson, William H.
Vazquez-Prokopec, Gonzalo M.
Scott, Thomas W.
Morrison, Amy C.
Reiner Jr., Robert C.
Perkins, T. Alex
Optimizing the deployment of ultra-low volume and targeted indoor residual spraying for dengue outbreak response
title Optimizing the deployment of ultra-low volume and targeted indoor residual spraying for dengue outbreak response
title_full Optimizing the deployment of ultra-low volume and targeted indoor residual spraying for dengue outbreak response
title_fullStr Optimizing the deployment of ultra-low volume and targeted indoor residual spraying for dengue outbreak response
title_full_unstemmed Optimizing the deployment of ultra-low volume and targeted indoor residual spraying for dengue outbreak response
title_short Optimizing the deployment of ultra-low volume and targeted indoor residual spraying for dengue outbreak response
title_sort optimizing the deployment of ultra-low volume and targeted indoor residual spraying for dengue outbreak response
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7200023/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32310958
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007743
work_keys_str_mv AT cavanyseanm optimizingthedeploymentofultralowvolumeandtargetedindoorresidualsprayingfordengueoutbreakresponse
AT espanaguido optimizingthedeploymentofultralowvolumeandtargetedindoorresidualsprayingfordengueoutbreakresponse
AT lloydalunl optimizingthedeploymentofultralowvolumeandtargetedindoorresidualsprayingfordengueoutbreakresponse
AT wallerlancea optimizingthedeploymentofultralowvolumeandtargetedindoorresidualsprayingfordengueoutbreakresponse
AT kitronuriel optimizingthedeploymentofultralowvolumeandtargetedindoorresidualsprayingfordengueoutbreakresponse
AT astetehelvio optimizingthedeploymentofultralowvolumeandtargetedindoorresidualsprayingfordengueoutbreakresponse
AT elsonwilliamh optimizingthedeploymentofultralowvolumeandtargetedindoorresidualsprayingfordengueoutbreakresponse
AT vazquezprokopecgonzalom optimizingthedeploymentofultralowvolumeandtargetedindoorresidualsprayingfordengueoutbreakresponse
AT scottthomasw optimizingthedeploymentofultralowvolumeandtargetedindoorresidualsprayingfordengueoutbreakresponse
AT morrisonamyc optimizingthedeploymentofultralowvolumeandtargetedindoorresidualsprayingfordengueoutbreakresponse
AT reinerjrrobertc optimizingthedeploymentofultralowvolumeandtargetedindoorresidualsprayingfordengueoutbreakresponse
AT perkinstalex optimizingthedeploymentofultralowvolumeandtargetedindoorresidualsprayingfordengueoutbreakresponse