Cargando…
Optimizing the deployment of ultra-low volume and targeted indoor residual spraying for dengue outbreak response
Recent years have seen rising incidence of dengue and large outbreaks of Zika and chikungunya, which are all caused by viruses transmitted by Aedes aegypti mosquitoes. In most settings, the primary intervention against Aedes-transmitted viruses is vector control, such as indoor, ultra-low volume (UL...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7200023/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32310958 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007743 |
_version_ | 1783529258781507584 |
---|---|
author | Cavany, Sean M. España, Guido Lloyd, Alun L. Waller, Lance A. Kitron, Uriel Astete, Helvio Elson, William H. Vazquez-Prokopec, Gonzalo M. Scott, Thomas W. Morrison, Amy C. Reiner Jr., Robert C. Perkins, T. Alex |
author_facet | Cavany, Sean M. España, Guido Lloyd, Alun L. Waller, Lance A. Kitron, Uriel Astete, Helvio Elson, William H. Vazquez-Prokopec, Gonzalo M. Scott, Thomas W. Morrison, Amy C. Reiner Jr., Robert C. Perkins, T. Alex |
author_sort | Cavany, Sean M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Recent years have seen rising incidence of dengue and large outbreaks of Zika and chikungunya, which are all caused by viruses transmitted by Aedes aegypti mosquitoes. In most settings, the primary intervention against Aedes-transmitted viruses is vector control, such as indoor, ultra-low volume (ULV) spraying. Targeted indoor residual spraying (TIRS) has the potential to more effectively impact Aedes-borne diseases, but its implementation requires careful planning and evaluation. The optimal time to deploy these interventions and their relative epidemiological effects are, however, not well understood. We used an agent-based model of dengue virus transmission calibrated to data from Iquitos, Peru to assess the epidemiological effects of these interventions under differing strategies for deploying them. Specifically, we compared strategies where spray application was initiated when incidence rose above a threshold based on incidence in recent years to strategies where spraying occurred at the same time(s) each year. In the absence of spraying, the model predicted 361,000 infections [inter-quartile range (IQR): 347,000–383,000] in the period 2000–2010. The ULV strategy with the fewest median infections was spraying twice yearly, in March and October, which led to a median of 172,000 infections [IQR: 158,000–183,000], a 52% reduction from baseline. Compared to spraying once yearly in September, the best threshold-based strategy utilizing ULV had fewer median infections (254,000 vs. 261,000), but required more spraying (351 vs. 274 days). For TIRS, the best strategy was threshold-based, which led to the fewest infections of all strategies tested (9,900; [IQR: 8,720–11,400], a 94% reduction), and required fewer days spraying than the equivalent ULV strategy (280). Although spraying twice each year is likely to avert the most infections, our results indicate that a threshold-based strategy can become an alternative to better balance the translation of spraying effort into impact, particularly if used with a residual insecticide. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7200023 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72000232020-05-12 Optimizing the deployment of ultra-low volume and targeted indoor residual spraying for dengue outbreak response Cavany, Sean M. España, Guido Lloyd, Alun L. Waller, Lance A. Kitron, Uriel Astete, Helvio Elson, William H. Vazquez-Prokopec, Gonzalo M. Scott, Thomas W. Morrison, Amy C. Reiner Jr., Robert C. Perkins, T. Alex PLoS Comput Biol Research Article Recent years have seen rising incidence of dengue and large outbreaks of Zika and chikungunya, which are all caused by viruses transmitted by Aedes aegypti mosquitoes. In most settings, the primary intervention against Aedes-transmitted viruses is vector control, such as indoor, ultra-low volume (ULV) spraying. Targeted indoor residual spraying (TIRS) has the potential to more effectively impact Aedes-borne diseases, but its implementation requires careful planning and evaluation. The optimal time to deploy these interventions and their relative epidemiological effects are, however, not well understood. We used an agent-based model of dengue virus transmission calibrated to data from Iquitos, Peru to assess the epidemiological effects of these interventions under differing strategies for deploying them. Specifically, we compared strategies where spray application was initiated when incidence rose above a threshold based on incidence in recent years to strategies where spraying occurred at the same time(s) each year. In the absence of spraying, the model predicted 361,000 infections [inter-quartile range (IQR): 347,000–383,000] in the period 2000–2010. The ULV strategy with the fewest median infections was spraying twice yearly, in March and October, which led to a median of 172,000 infections [IQR: 158,000–183,000], a 52% reduction from baseline. Compared to spraying once yearly in September, the best threshold-based strategy utilizing ULV had fewer median infections (254,000 vs. 261,000), but required more spraying (351 vs. 274 days). For TIRS, the best strategy was threshold-based, which led to the fewest infections of all strategies tested (9,900; [IQR: 8,720–11,400], a 94% reduction), and required fewer days spraying than the equivalent ULV strategy (280). Although spraying twice each year is likely to avert the most infections, our results indicate that a threshold-based strategy can become an alternative to better balance the translation of spraying effort into impact, particularly if used with a residual insecticide. Public Library of Science 2020-04-20 /pmc/articles/PMC7200023/ /pubmed/32310958 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007743 Text en https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ This is an open access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) public domain dedication. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Cavany, Sean M. España, Guido Lloyd, Alun L. Waller, Lance A. Kitron, Uriel Astete, Helvio Elson, William H. Vazquez-Prokopec, Gonzalo M. Scott, Thomas W. Morrison, Amy C. Reiner Jr., Robert C. Perkins, T. Alex Optimizing the deployment of ultra-low volume and targeted indoor residual spraying for dengue outbreak response |
title | Optimizing the deployment of ultra-low volume and targeted indoor residual spraying for dengue outbreak response |
title_full | Optimizing the deployment of ultra-low volume and targeted indoor residual spraying for dengue outbreak response |
title_fullStr | Optimizing the deployment of ultra-low volume and targeted indoor residual spraying for dengue outbreak response |
title_full_unstemmed | Optimizing the deployment of ultra-low volume and targeted indoor residual spraying for dengue outbreak response |
title_short | Optimizing the deployment of ultra-low volume and targeted indoor residual spraying for dengue outbreak response |
title_sort | optimizing the deployment of ultra-low volume and targeted indoor residual spraying for dengue outbreak response |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7200023/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32310958 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007743 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cavanyseanm optimizingthedeploymentofultralowvolumeandtargetedindoorresidualsprayingfordengueoutbreakresponse AT espanaguido optimizingthedeploymentofultralowvolumeandtargetedindoorresidualsprayingfordengueoutbreakresponse AT lloydalunl optimizingthedeploymentofultralowvolumeandtargetedindoorresidualsprayingfordengueoutbreakresponse AT wallerlancea optimizingthedeploymentofultralowvolumeandtargetedindoorresidualsprayingfordengueoutbreakresponse AT kitronuriel optimizingthedeploymentofultralowvolumeandtargetedindoorresidualsprayingfordengueoutbreakresponse AT astetehelvio optimizingthedeploymentofultralowvolumeandtargetedindoorresidualsprayingfordengueoutbreakresponse AT elsonwilliamh optimizingthedeploymentofultralowvolumeandtargetedindoorresidualsprayingfordengueoutbreakresponse AT vazquezprokopecgonzalom optimizingthedeploymentofultralowvolumeandtargetedindoorresidualsprayingfordengueoutbreakresponse AT scottthomasw optimizingthedeploymentofultralowvolumeandtargetedindoorresidualsprayingfordengueoutbreakresponse AT morrisonamyc optimizingthedeploymentofultralowvolumeandtargetedindoorresidualsprayingfordengueoutbreakresponse AT reinerjrrobertc optimizingthedeploymentofultralowvolumeandtargetedindoorresidualsprayingfordengueoutbreakresponse AT perkinstalex optimizingthedeploymentofultralowvolumeandtargetedindoorresidualsprayingfordengueoutbreakresponse |