Cargando…

Machine learning goes wild: Using data from captive individuals to infer wildlife behaviours

1. Remotely tracking distinct behaviours of animals using acceleration data and machine learning has been carried out successfully in several species in captive settings. In order to study the ecology of animals in natural habitats, such behaviour classification models need to be transferred to wild...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rast, Wanja, Kimmig, Sophia Elisabeth, Giese, Lisa, Berger, Anne
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7200095/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32369485
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0227317
_version_ 1783529272668848128
author Rast, Wanja
Kimmig, Sophia Elisabeth
Giese, Lisa
Berger, Anne
author_facet Rast, Wanja
Kimmig, Sophia Elisabeth
Giese, Lisa
Berger, Anne
author_sort Rast, Wanja
collection PubMed
description 1. Remotely tracking distinct behaviours of animals using acceleration data and machine learning has been carried out successfully in several species in captive settings. In order to study the ecology of animals in natural habitats, such behaviour classification models need to be transferred to wild individuals. However, at present, the development of those models usually requires direct observation of the target animals. 2. The goal of this study was to infer the behaviour of wild, free-roaming animals from acceleration data by training behaviour classification models on captive individuals, without the necessity to observe their wild conspecifics. We further sought to develop methods to validate the credibility of the resulting behaviour extrapolations. 3. We trained two machine learning algorithms proposed by the literature, Random Forest (RF) and Support Vector Machine (SVM), on data from captive red foxes (Vulpes vulpes) and later applied them to data from wild foxes. We also tested a new advance for behaviour classification, by applying a moving window to an Artificial Neural Network (ANN). Finally, we investigated four strategies to validate our classification output. 4. While all three machine learning algorithms performed well under training conditions (Kappa values: RF (0.82), SVM (0.78), ANN (0.85)), the established methods, RF and SVM, failed in classifying distinct behaviours when transferred from captive to wild foxes. Behaviour classification with the ANN and a moving window, in contrast, inferred distinct behaviours and showed consistent results for most individuals. 5. Our approach is a substantial improvement over the methods previously proposed in the literature as it generated plausible results for wild fox behaviour. We were able to infer the behaviour of wild animals that have never been observed in the wild and to further illustrate the credibility of the output. This framework is not restricted to foxes but can be applied to infer the behaviour of many other species and thus empowers new advances in behavioural ecology.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7200095
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72000952020-05-12 Machine learning goes wild: Using data from captive individuals to infer wildlife behaviours Rast, Wanja Kimmig, Sophia Elisabeth Giese, Lisa Berger, Anne PLoS One Research Article 1. Remotely tracking distinct behaviours of animals using acceleration data and machine learning has been carried out successfully in several species in captive settings. In order to study the ecology of animals in natural habitats, such behaviour classification models need to be transferred to wild individuals. However, at present, the development of those models usually requires direct observation of the target animals. 2. The goal of this study was to infer the behaviour of wild, free-roaming animals from acceleration data by training behaviour classification models on captive individuals, without the necessity to observe their wild conspecifics. We further sought to develop methods to validate the credibility of the resulting behaviour extrapolations. 3. We trained two machine learning algorithms proposed by the literature, Random Forest (RF) and Support Vector Machine (SVM), on data from captive red foxes (Vulpes vulpes) and later applied them to data from wild foxes. We also tested a new advance for behaviour classification, by applying a moving window to an Artificial Neural Network (ANN). Finally, we investigated four strategies to validate our classification output. 4. While all three machine learning algorithms performed well under training conditions (Kappa values: RF (0.82), SVM (0.78), ANN (0.85)), the established methods, RF and SVM, failed in classifying distinct behaviours when transferred from captive to wild foxes. Behaviour classification with the ANN and a moving window, in contrast, inferred distinct behaviours and showed consistent results for most individuals. 5. Our approach is a substantial improvement over the methods previously proposed in the literature as it generated plausible results for wild fox behaviour. We were able to infer the behaviour of wild animals that have never been observed in the wild and to further illustrate the credibility of the output. This framework is not restricted to foxes but can be applied to infer the behaviour of many other species and thus empowers new advances in behavioural ecology. Public Library of Science 2020-05-05 /pmc/articles/PMC7200095/ /pubmed/32369485 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0227317 Text en © 2020 Rast et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Rast, Wanja
Kimmig, Sophia Elisabeth
Giese, Lisa
Berger, Anne
Machine learning goes wild: Using data from captive individuals to infer wildlife behaviours
title Machine learning goes wild: Using data from captive individuals to infer wildlife behaviours
title_full Machine learning goes wild: Using data from captive individuals to infer wildlife behaviours
title_fullStr Machine learning goes wild: Using data from captive individuals to infer wildlife behaviours
title_full_unstemmed Machine learning goes wild: Using data from captive individuals to infer wildlife behaviours
title_short Machine learning goes wild: Using data from captive individuals to infer wildlife behaviours
title_sort machine learning goes wild: using data from captive individuals to infer wildlife behaviours
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7200095/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32369485
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0227317
work_keys_str_mv AT rastwanja machinelearninggoeswildusingdatafromcaptiveindividualstoinferwildlifebehaviours
AT kimmigsophiaelisabeth machinelearninggoeswildusingdatafromcaptiveindividualstoinferwildlifebehaviours
AT gieselisa machinelearninggoeswildusingdatafromcaptiveindividualstoinferwildlifebehaviours
AT bergeranne machinelearninggoeswildusingdatafromcaptiveindividualstoinferwildlifebehaviours