Cargando…

Relationship of captive bolt stunning location with basic tissue measurements and exposed cross-sectional brain area in cadaver heads from market pigs

The objective of this study was to contrast the soft tissue thickness, cranial thickness, total tissue thickness, cross-sectional brain area, and bolt–brain contact from the common frontal application of captive bolt euthanasia with the alternative location behind the ear in cadaver swine heads. Twe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Anderson, Karly, Ries, Elizabeth, Backes, Jacob, Bishop, Katherine, Boll, Miranda, Brantner, Ellie, Hinrichs, Brady, Kirk, Ashlynn, Olsen, Hannah, Risius, Blake, Bildstein, Charles, Vogel, Kurt D
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7200422/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32704904
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/tas/txz097
_version_ 1783529330068946944
author Anderson, Karly
Ries, Elizabeth
Backes, Jacob
Bishop, Katherine
Boll, Miranda
Brantner, Ellie
Hinrichs, Brady
Kirk, Ashlynn
Olsen, Hannah
Risius, Blake
Bildstein, Charles
Vogel, Kurt D
author_facet Anderson, Karly
Ries, Elizabeth
Backes, Jacob
Bishop, Katherine
Boll, Miranda
Brantner, Ellie
Hinrichs, Brady
Kirk, Ashlynn
Olsen, Hannah
Risius, Blake
Bildstein, Charles
Vogel, Kurt D
author_sort Anderson, Karly
collection PubMed
description The objective of this study was to contrast the soft tissue thickness, cranial thickness, total tissue thickness, cross-sectional brain area, and bolt–brain contact from the common frontal application of captive bolt euthanasia with the alternative location behind the ear in cadaver swine heads. Twenty-three cadaver heads from pigs that were approximately 136 kg and 6 mo of age were collected from a regional slaughter establishment following CO(2) stunning and assigned to either the FRONTAL (n = 11) or the CAUDAL TO PINNA (n = 12) application of the captive bolt. The soft tissue thickness was different (P < 0.0001) between the 2 applications (FRONTAL: 8.3 ± 3.4 mm; CAUDAL TO PINNA: 56.5 ± 3.4 mm). The cranial thickness was different (P < 0.0001) between the applications (FRONTAL: 23.4 ± 2.9 mm; CAUDAL TO PINNA: 26.5 ± 2.9 mm). There was also a difference (P < 0.0001) in the total tissue thickness between the 2 applications (FRONTAL: 31.7 ± 3.8 mm; CAUDAL TO PINNA: 73.4 ± 3.8 mm). Cross-sectional area was calculated from images collected immediately after the heads were cut along the plane of bolt travel by bandsaw and was different (P = 0.0028) between the 2 applications (FRONTAL: 25.2 ± 1.3 cm(2); CAUDAL TO PINNA: 18.9 ± 1.3 cm(2)). Bolt–brain contact was also assessed from the images, and a difference (P = 0.0360) between the 2 applications (FRONTAL: 100 ± 10.5%; CAUDAL TO PINNA: 66.7 ± 10.5%) was identified. The results of this study suggest that the FRONTAL application may provide a bolt path with less tissue to travel through when compared with the CAUDAL TO PINNA application for pigs of the approximate age and weight of those in this study. Ultimately, the FRONTAL location may present less risk for the captive bolt euthanasia of swine at market weight at this time. Additional refinement of the CAUDAL TO PINNA procedure and modification to the captive bolt device to penetrate to a suitable depth to ensure brain damage is recommended.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7200422
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72004222020-07-22 Relationship of captive bolt stunning location with basic tissue measurements and exposed cross-sectional brain area in cadaver heads from market pigs Anderson, Karly Ries, Elizabeth Backes, Jacob Bishop, Katherine Boll, Miranda Brantner, Ellie Hinrichs, Brady Kirk, Ashlynn Olsen, Hannah Risius, Blake Bildstein, Charles Vogel, Kurt D Transl Anim Sci Animal Health And Well Being The objective of this study was to contrast the soft tissue thickness, cranial thickness, total tissue thickness, cross-sectional brain area, and bolt–brain contact from the common frontal application of captive bolt euthanasia with the alternative location behind the ear in cadaver swine heads. Twenty-three cadaver heads from pigs that were approximately 136 kg and 6 mo of age were collected from a regional slaughter establishment following CO(2) stunning and assigned to either the FRONTAL (n = 11) or the CAUDAL TO PINNA (n = 12) application of the captive bolt. The soft tissue thickness was different (P < 0.0001) between the 2 applications (FRONTAL: 8.3 ± 3.4 mm; CAUDAL TO PINNA: 56.5 ± 3.4 mm). The cranial thickness was different (P < 0.0001) between the applications (FRONTAL: 23.4 ± 2.9 mm; CAUDAL TO PINNA: 26.5 ± 2.9 mm). There was also a difference (P < 0.0001) in the total tissue thickness between the 2 applications (FRONTAL: 31.7 ± 3.8 mm; CAUDAL TO PINNA: 73.4 ± 3.8 mm). Cross-sectional area was calculated from images collected immediately after the heads were cut along the plane of bolt travel by bandsaw and was different (P = 0.0028) between the 2 applications (FRONTAL: 25.2 ± 1.3 cm(2); CAUDAL TO PINNA: 18.9 ± 1.3 cm(2)). Bolt–brain contact was also assessed from the images, and a difference (P = 0.0360) between the 2 applications (FRONTAL: 100 ± 10.5%; CAUDAL TO PINNA: 66.7 ± 10.5%) was identified. The results of this study suggest that the FRONTAL application may provide a bolt path with less tissue to travel through when compared with the CAUDAL TO PINNA application for pigs of the approximate age and weight of those in this study. Ultimately, the FRONTAL location may present less risk for the captive bolt euthanasia of swine at market weight at this time. Additional refinement of the CAUDAL TO PINNA procedure and modification to the captive bolt device to penetrate to a suitable depth to ensure brain damage is recommended. Oxford University Press 2019-06-27 /pmc/articles/PMC7200422/ /pubmed/32704904 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/tas/txz097 Text en © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society of Animal Science. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Animal Health And Well Being
Anderson, Karly
Ries, Elizabeth
Backes, Jacob
Bishop, Katherine
Boll, Miranda
Brantner, Ellie
Hinrichs, Brady
Kirk, Ashlynn
Olsen, Hannah
Risius, Blake
Bildstein, Charles
Vogel, Kurt D
Relationship of captive bolt stunning location with basic tissue measurements and exposed cross-sectional brain area in cadaver heads from market pigs
title Relationship of captive bolt stunning location with basic tissue measurements and exposed cross-sectional brain area in cadaver heads from market pigs
title_full Relationship of captive bolt stunning location with basic tissue measurements and exposed cross-sectional brain area in cadaver heads from market pigs
title_fullStr Relationship of captive bolt stunning location with basic tissue measurements and exposed cross-sectional brain area in cadaver heads from market pigs
title_full_unstemmed Relationship of captive bolt stunning location with basic tissue measurements and exposed cross-sectional brain area in cadaver heads from market pigs
title_short Relationship of captive bolt stunning location with basic tissue measurements and exposed cross-sectional brain area in cadaver heads from market pigs
title_sort relationship of captive bolt stunning location with basic tissue measurements and exposed cross-sectional brain area in cadaver heads from market pigs
topic Animal Health And Well Being
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7200422/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32704904
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/tas/txz097
work_keys_str_mv AT andersonkarly relationshipofcaptiveboltstunninglocationwithbasictissuemeasurementsandexposedcrosssectionalbrainareaincadaverheadsfrommarketpigs
AT rieselizabeth relationshipofcaptiveboltstunninglocationwithbasictissuemeasurementsandexposedcrosssectionalbrainareaincadaverheadsfrommarketpigs
AT backesjacob relationshipofcaptiveboltstunninglocationwithbasictissuemeasurementsandexposedcrosssectionalbrainareaincadaverheadsfrommarketpigs
AT bishopkatherine relationshipofcaptiveboltstunninglocationwithbasictissuemeasurementsandexposedcrosssectionalbrainareaincadaverheadsfrommarketpigs
AT bollmiranda relationshipofcaptiveboltstunninglocationwithbasictissuemeasurementsandexposedcrosssectionalbrainareaincadaverheadsfrommarketpigs
AT brantnerellie relationshipofcaptiveboltstunninglocationwithbasictissuemeasurementsandexposedcrosssectionalbrainareaincadaverheadsfrommarketpigs
AT hinrichsbrady relationshipofcaptiveboltstunninglocationwithbasictissuemeasurementsandexposedcrosssectionalbrainareaincadaverheadsfrommarketpigs
AT kirkashlynn relationshipofcaptiveboltstunninglocationwithbasictissuemeasurementsandexposedcrosssectionalbrainareaincadaverheadsfrommarketpigs
AT olsenhannah relationshipofcaptiveboltstunninglocationwithbasictissuemeasurementsandexposedcrosssectionalbrainareaincadaverheadsfrommarketpigs
AT risiusblake relationshipofcaptiveboltstunninglocationwithbasictissuemeasurementsandexposedcrosssectionalbrainareaincadaverheadsfrommarketpigs
AT bildsteincharles relationshipofcaptiveboltstunninglocationwithbasictissuemeasurementsandexposedcrosssectionalbrainareaincadaverheadsfrommarketpigs
AT vogelkurtd relationshipofcaptiveboltstunninglocationwithbasictissuemeasurementsandexposedcrosssectionalbrainareaincadaverheadsfrommarketpigs