Cargando…
Relationship of captive bolt stunning location with basic tissue measurements and exposed cross-sectional brain area in cadaver heads from market pigs
The objective of this study was to contrast the soft tissue thickness, cranial thickness, total tissue thickness, cross-sectional brain area, and bolt–brain contact from the common frontal application of captive bolt euthanasia with the alternative location behind the ear in cadaver swine heads. Twe...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7200422/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32704904 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/tas/txz097 |
_version_ | 1783529330068946944 |
---|---|
author | Anderson, Karly Ries, Elizabeth Backes, Jacob Bishop, Katherine Boll, Miranda Brantner, Ellie Hinrichs, Brady Kirk, Ashlynn Olsen, Hannah Risius, Blake Bildstein, Charles Vogel, Kurt D |
author_facet | Anderson, Karly Ries, Elizabeth Backes, Jacob Bishop, Katherine Boll, Miranda Brantner, Ellie Hinrichs, Brady Kirk, Ashlynn Olsen, Hannah Risius, Blake Bildstein, Charles Vogel, Kurt D |
author_sort | Anderson, Karly |
collection | PubMed |
description | The objective of this study was to contrast the soft tissue thickness, cranial thickness, total tissue thickness, cross-sectional brain area, and bolt–brain contact from the common frontal application of captive bolt euthanasia with the alternative location behind the ear in cadaver swine heads. Twenty-three cadaver heads from pigs that were approximately 136 kg and 6 mo of age were collected from a regional slaughter establishment following CO(2) stunning and assigned to either the FRONTAL (n = 11) or the CAUDAL TO PINNA (n = 12) application of the captive bolt. The soft tissue thickness was different (P < 0.0001) between the 2 applications (FRONTAL: 8.3 ± 3.4 mm; CAUDAL TO PINNA: 56.5 ± 3.4 mm). The cranial thickness was different (P < 0.0001) between the applications (FRONTAL: 23.4 ± 2.9 mm; CAUDAL TO PINNA: 26.5 ± 2.9 mm). There was also a difference (P < 0.0001) in the total tissue thickness between the 2 applications (FRONTAL: 31.7 ± 3.8 mm; CAUDAL TO PINNA: 73.4 ± 3.8 mm). Cross-sectional area was calculated from images collected immediately after the heads were cut along the plane of bolt travel by bandsaw and was different (P = 0.0028) between the 2 applications (FRONTAL: 25.2 ± 1.3 cm(2); CAUDAL TO PINNA: 18.9 ± 1.3 cm(2)). Bolt–brain contact was also assessed from the images, and a difference (P = 0.0360) between the 2 applications (FRONTAL: 100 ± 10.5%; CAUDAL TO PINNA: 66.7 ± 10.5%) was identified. The results of this study suggest that the FRONTAL application may provide a bolt path with less tissue to travel through when compared with the CAUDAL TO PINNA application for pigs of the approximate age and weight of those in this study. Ultimately, the FRONTAL location may present less risk for the captive bolt euthanasia of swine at market weight at this time. Additional refinement of the CAUDAL TO PINNA procedure and modification to the captive bolt device to penetrate to a suitable depth to ensure brain damage is recommended. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7200422 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72004222020-07-22 Relationship of captive bolt stunning location with basic tissue measurements and exposed cross-sectional brain area in cadaver heads from market pigs Anderson, Karly Ries, Elizabeth Backes, Jacob Bishop, Katherine Boll, Miranda Brantner, Ellie Hinrichs, Brady Kirk, Ashlynn Olsen, Hannah Risius, Blake Bildstein, Charles Vogel, Kurt D Transl Anim Sci Animal Health And Well Being The objective of this study was to contrast the soft tissue thickness, cranial thickness, total tissue thickness, cross-sectional brain area, and bolt–brain contact from the common frontal application of captive bolt euthanasia with the alternative location behind the ear in cadaver swine heads. Twenty-three cadaver heads from pigs that were approximately 136 kg and 6 mo of age were collected from a regional slaughter establishment following CO(2) stunning and assigned to either the FRONTAL (n = 11) or the CAUDAL TO PINNA (n = 12) application of the captive bolt. The soft tissue thickness was different (P < 0.0001) between the 2 applications (FRONTAL: 8.3 ± 3.4 mm; CAUDAL TO PINNA: 56.5 ± 3.4 mm). The cranial thickness was different (P < 0.0001) between the applications (FRONTAL: 23.4 ± 2.9 mm; CAUDAL TO PINNA: 26.5 ± 2.9 mm). There was also a difference (P < 0.0001) in the total tissue thickness between the 2 applications (FRONTAL: 31.7 ± 3.8 mm; CAUDAL TO PINNA: 73.4 ± 3.8 mm). Cross-sectional area was calculated from images collected immediately after the heads were cut along the plane of bolt travel by bandsaw and was different (P = 0.0028) between the 2 applications (FRONTAL: 25.2 ± 1.3 cm(2); CAUDAL TO PINNA: 18.9 ± 1.3 cm(2)). Bolt–brain contact was also assessed from the images, and a difference (P = 0.0360) between the 2 applications (FRONTAL: 100 ± 10.5%; CAUDAL TO PINNA: 66.7 ± 10.5%) was identified. The results of this study suggest that the FRONTAL application may provide a bolt path with less tissue to travel through when compared with the CAUDAL TO PINNA application for pigs of the approximate age and weight of those in this study. Ultimately, the FRONTAL location may present less risk for the captive bolt euthanasia of swine at market weight at this time. Additional refinement of the CAUDAL TO PINNA procedure and modification to the captive bolt device to penetrate to a suitable depth to ensure brain damage is recommended. Oxford University Press 2019-06-27 /pmc/articles/PMC7200422/ /pubmed/32704904 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/tas/txz097 Text en © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society of Animal Science. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Animal Health And Well Being Anderson, Karly Ries, Elizabeth Backes, Jacob Bishop, Katherine Boll, Miranda Brantner, Ellie Hinrichs, Brady Kirk, Ashlynn Olsen, Hannah Risius, Blake Bildstein, Charles Vogel, Kurt D Relationship of captive bolt stunning location with basic tissue measurements and exposed cross-sectional brain area in cadaver heads from market pigs |
title | Relationship of captive bolt stunning location with basic tissue measurements and exposed cross-sectional brain area in cadaver heads from market pigs |
title_full | Relationship of captive bolt stunning location with basic tissue measurements and exposed cross-sectional brain area in cadaver heads from market pigs |
title_fullStr | Relationship of captive bolt stunning location with basic tissue measurements and exposed cross-sectional brain area in cadaver heads from market pigs |
title_full_unstemmed | Relationship of captive bolt stunning location with basic tissue measurements and exposed cross-sectional brain area in cadaver heads from market pigs |
title_short | Relationship of captive bolt stunning location with basic tissue measurements and exposed cross-sectional brain area in cadaver heads from market pigs |
title_sort | relationship of captive bolt stunning location with basic tissue measurements and exposed cross-sectional brain area in cadaver heads from market pigs |
topic | Animal Health And Well Being |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7200422/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32704904 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/tas/txz097 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT andersonkarly relationshipofcaptiveboltstunninglocationwithbasictissuemeasurementsandexposedcrosssectionalbrainareaincadaverheadsfrommarketpigs AT rieselizabeth relationshipofcaptiveboltstunninglocationwithbasictissuemeasurementsandexposedcrosssectionalbrainareaincadaverheadsfrommarketpigs AT backesjacob relationshipofcaptiveboltstunninglocationwithbasictissuemeasurementsandexposedcrosssectionalbrainareaincadaverheadsfrommarketpigs AT bishopkatherine relationshipofcaptiveboltstunninglocationwithbasictissuemeasurementsandexposedcrosssectionalbrainareaincadaverheadsfrommarketpigs AT bollmiranda relationshipofcaptiveboltstunninglocationwithbasictissuemeasurementsandexposedcrosssectionalbrainareaincadaverheadsfrommarketpigs AT brantnerellie relationshipofcaptiveboltstunninglocationwithbasictissuemeasurementsandexposedcrosssectionalbrainareaincadaverheadsfrommarketpigs AT hinrichsbrady relationshipofcaptiveboltstunninglocationwithbasictissuemeasurementsandexposedcrosssectionalbrainareaincadaverheadsfrommarketpigs AT kirkashlynn relationshipofcaptiveboltstunninglocationwithbasictissuemeasurementsandexposedcrosssectionalbrainareaincadaverheadsfrommarketpigs AT olsenhannah relationshipofcaptiveboltstunninglocationwithbasictissuemeasurementsandexposedcrosssectionalbrainareaincadaverheadsfrommarketpigs AT risiusblake relationshipofcaptiveboltstunninglocationwithbasictissuemeasurementsandexposedcrosssectionalbrainareaincadaverheadsfrommarketpigs AT bildsteincharles relationshipofcaptiveboltstunninglocationwithbasictissuemeasurementsandexposedcrosssectionalbrainareaincadaverheadsfrommarketpigs AT vogelkurtd relationshipofcaptiveboltstunninglocationwithbasictissuemeasurementsandexposedcrosssectionalbrainareaincadaverheadsfrommarketpigs |