Cargando…
Raised without antibiotics: impact on animal welfare and implications for food policy
This study assesses the impact of broilers raised without antibiotics and the information gap that exists between consumer perception and production methods. Specifically looking at risk of eye burns, footpad lesions, and airsacculitis, key indicators of animal welfare, bird-level data are collected...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7200433/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32704717 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/tas/txy016 |
_version_ | 1783529332172390400 |
---|---|
author | Karavolias, Joanna Salois, Matthew Jude Baker, Kristi T Watkins, Kevin |
author_facet | Karavolias, Joanna Salois, Matthew Jude Baker, Kristi T Watkins, Kevin |
author_sort | Karavolias, Joanna |
collection | PubMed |
description | This study assesses the impact of broilers raised without antibiotics and the information gap that exists between consumer perception and production methods. Specifically looking at risk of eye burns, footpad lesions, and airsacculitis, key indicators of animal welfare, bird-level data are collected on the occurrence and severity of each disease state by the type of antibiotic program: no antibiotics ever, nonmedically important antibiotics, or medically important antibiotics. Odds ratios and marginal effects are calculated to understand how the occurrence and severity change with access to medicine. Broilers never given antibiotics had a higher likelihood of disease states investigated, and with greater severity. In some cases, access to nonmedically important ionophores mitigated the risk of occurrence and severity of the conditions. The finding indicates that the growing trend of raising broilers without antibiotics may negatively affect animal welfare. This stands in contrast to existing consumer research showing that consumers purchase poultry raised without antibiotics because they believe that it promotes healthier animals. Therefore, a significant consumer information gap exists which needs to be addressed. JEL Codes: Q130, Q160, Q180 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7200433 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72004332020-07-22 Raised without antibiotics: impact on animal welfare and implications for food policy Karavolias, Joanna Salois, Matthew Jude Baker, Kristi T Watkins, Kevin Transl Anim Sci Animal Health and Well Being This study assesses the impact of broilers raised without antibiotics and the information gap that exists between consumer perception and production methods. Specifically looking at risk of eye burns, footpad lesions, and airsacculitis, key indicators of animal welfare, bird-level data are collected on the occurrence and severity of each disease state by the type of antibiotic program: no antibiotics ever, nonmedically important antibiotics, or medically important antibiotics. Odds ratios and marginal effects are calculated to understand how the occurrence and severity change with access to medicine. Broilers never given antibiotics had a higher likelihood of disease states investigated, and with greater severity. In some cases, access to nonmedically important ionophores mitigated the risk of occurrence and severity of the conditions. The finding indicates that the growing trend of raising broilers without antibiotics may negatively affect animal welfare. This stands in contrast to existing consumer research showing that consumers purchase poultry raised without antibiotics because they believe that it promotes healthier animals. Therefore, a significant consumer information gap exists which needs to be addressed. JEL Codes: Q130, Q160, Q180 Oxford University Press 2018-08-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7200433/ /pubmed/32704717 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/tas/txy016 Text en © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society of Animal Science. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Animal Health and Well Being Karavolias, Joanna Salois, Matthew Jude Baker, Kristi T Watkins, Kevin Raised without antibiotics: impact on animal welfare and implications for food policy |
title | Raised without antibiotics: impact on animal welfare and implications for food policy |
title_full | Raised without antibiotics: impact on animal welfare and implications for food policy |
title_fullStr | Raised without antibiotics: impact on animal welfare and implications for food policy |
title_full_unstemmed | Raised without antibiotics: impact on animal welfare and implications for food policy |
title_short | Raised without antibiotics: impact on animal welfare and implications for food policy |
title_sort | raised without antibiotics: impact on animal welfare and implications for food policy |
topic | Animal Health and Well Being |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7200433/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32704717 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/tas/txy016 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT karavoliasjoanna raisedwithoutantibioticsimpactonanimalwelfareandimplicationsforfoodpolicy AT saloismatthewjude raisedwithoutantibioticsimpactonanimalwelfareandimplicationsforfoodpolicy AT bakerkristit raisedwithoutantibioticsimpactonanimalwelfareandimplicationsforfoodpolicy AT watkinskevin raisedwithoutantibioticsimpactonanimalwelfareandimplicationsforfoodpolicy |