Cargando…

Association between residual feed intake and enteric methane emissions in Hereford steers

The objective of this study was to quantify the emissions of enteric CH(4) from growing Hereford steers raised under feedlot conditions based on contrasting levels of residual feed intake (RFI). A repeated measurements experiment was conducted over 20 d to determine CH(4) production from two groups...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dini, Yoana, Cajarville, Cecilia, Gere, José I, Fernandez, Sofía, Fraga, Martín, Pravia, Maria Isabel, Navajas, Elly Ana, Ciganda, Verónica S
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7200529/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32704795
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/tas/txy111
_version_ 1783529353564389376
author Dini, Yoana
Cajarville, Cecilia
Gere, José I
Fernandez, Sofía
Fraga, Martín
Pravia, Maria Isabel
Navajas, Elly Ana
Ciganda, Verónica S
author_facet Dini, Yoana
Cajarville, Cecilia
Gere, José I
Fernandez, Sofía
Fraga, Martín
Pravia, Maria Isabel
Navajas, Elly Ana
Ciganda, Verónica S
author_sort Dini, Yoana
collection PubMed
description The objective of this study was to quantify the emissions of enteric CH(4) from growing Hereford steers raised under feedlot conditions based on contrasting levels of residual feed intake (RFI). A repeated measurements experiment was conducted over 20 d to determine CH(4) production from two groups of nine Hereford steers, with contrasting RFI values (mean ± SD): low RFI (LRFI group; −0.78 ± 0.22 kg DMI/d) vs. high RFI (HRFI group; 0.83 ± 0.34 kg DMI/d). Steers were selected from a larger contemporary population in which the RFI was evaluated. Steers were maintained under confined conditions with ad libitum access to water and feed, comprising a total mixed ration of 55% sorghum silage, 21% barley silage, 21% corn grain, and 3% protein–mineral–vitamin–premix, provided twice a day. Before the beginning of CH(4) measurements, the live weight of both groups of animals was determined, which on average (±SEM) was 357.0 ± 5.11 and 334.0 ± 10.17 kg in the LRFI and HRFI groups, respectively. Methane emission (g/d) was measured on each animal with the sulfur hexafluoride (SF(6)) tracer technique, during two consecutive periods of 5 d. Individual daily intake and feeding behavior characteristics were measured using a GrowSafe automated feeding system (Model 6000, GrowSafe Systems Ltd, Airdrie, Alberta, Canada). Methanogens in the ruminal content were quantified using quantitative polymerase chain reaction with primers targeting the mcrA gene. Methane emission was near 27% lower in animals with LRFI when expressed in absolute terms (g/d; 26.8%; P = 0.009), by unit of dry matter intake (g CH(4)/kg; 27.9%, P = 0.021), or as % of gross energy intake (26.7%; P = 0.027). These differences could not be explained by differences in amount of total of methanogens (average = 9.82 log(10) units; P = 0.857). However, there were some differences in animal feeding behavior that could explain these differences (e.g., LRFI animals tended to spend less time in feeders). Our results suggest that, in Hereford steers, the selection by RFI values is a promising mitigation strategy for the reduction of the emission of enteric CH(4).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7200529
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72005292020-07-22 Association between residual feed intake and enteric methane emissions in Hereford steers Dini, Yoana Cajarville, Cecilia Gere, José I Fernandez, Sofía Fraga, Martín Pravia, Maria Isabel Navajas, Elly Ana Ciganda, Verónica S Transl Anim Sci Environmental Animal Science The objective of this study was to quantify the emissions of enteric CH(4) from growing Hereford steers raised under feedlot conditions based on contrasting levels of residual feed intake (RFI). A repeated measurements experiment was conducted over 20 d to determine CH(4) production from two groups of nine Hereford steers, with contrasting RFI values (mean ± SD): low RFI (LRFI group; −0.78 ± 0.22 kg DMI/d) vs. high RFI (HRFI group; 0.83 ± 0.34 kg DMI/d). Steers were selected from a larger contemporary population in which the RFI was evaluated. Steers were maintained under confined conditions with ad libitum access to water and feed, comprising a total mixed ration of 55% sorghum silage, 21% barley silage, 21% corn grain, and 3% protein–mineral–vitamin–premix, provided twice a day. Before the beginning of CH(4) measurements, the live weight of both groups of animals was determined, which on average (±SEM) was 357.0 ± 5.11 and 334.0 ± 10.17 kg in the LRFI and HRFI groups, respectively. Methane emission (g/d) was measured on each animal with the sulfur hexafluoride (SF(6)) tracer technique, during two consecutive periods of 5 d. Individual daily intake and feeding behavior characteristics were measured using a GrowSafe automated feeding system (Model 6000, GrowSafe Systems Ltd, Airdrie, Alberta, Canada). Methanogens in the ruminal content were quantified using quantitative polymerase chain reaction with primers targeting the mcrA gene. Methane emission was near 27% lower in animals with LRFI when expressed in absolute terms (g/d; 26.8%; P = 0.009), by unit of dry matter intake (g CH(4)/kg; 27.9%, P = 0.021), or as % of gross energy intake (26.7%; P = 0.027). These differences could not be explained by differences in amount of total of methanogens (average = 9.82 log(10) units; P = 0.857). However, there were some differences in animal feeding behavior that could explain these differences (e.g., LRFI animals tended to spend less time in feeders). Our results suggest that, in Hereford steers, the selection by RFI values is a promising mitigation strategy for the reduction of the emission of enteric CH(4). Oxford University Press 2018-10-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7200529/ /pubmed/32704795 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/tas/txy111 Text en © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society of Animal Science. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Environmental Animal Science
Dini, Yoana
Cajarville, Cecilia
Gere, José I
Fernandez, Sofía
Fraga, Martín
Pravia, Maria Isabel
Navajas, Elly Ana
Ciganda, Verónica S
Association between residual feed intake and enteric methane emissions in Hereford steers
title Association between residual feed intake and enteric methane emissions in Hereford steers
title_full Association between residual feed intake and enteric methane emissions in Hereford steers
title_fullStr Association between residual feed intake and enteric methane emissions in Hereford steers
title_full_unstemmed Association between residual feed intake and enteric methane emissions in Hereford steers
title_short Association between residual feed intake and enteric methane emissions in Hereford steers
title_sort association between residual feed intake and enteric methane emissions in hereford steers
topic Environmental Animal Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7200529/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32704795
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/tas/txy111
work_keys_str_mv AT diniyoana associationbetweenresidualfeedintakeandentericmethaneemissionsinherefordsteers
AT cajarvillececilia associationbetweenresidualfeedintakeandentericmethaneemissionsinherefordsteers
AT gerejosei associationbetweenresidualfeedintakeandentericmethaneemissionsinherefordsteers
AT fernandezsofia associationbetweenresidualfeedintakeandentericmethaneemissionsinherefordsteers
AT fragamartin associationbetweenresidualfeedintakeandentericmethaneemissionsinherefordsteers
AT praviamariaisabel associationbetweenresidualfeedintakeandentericmethaneemissionsinherefordsteers
AT navajasellyana associationbetweenresidualfeedintakeandentericmethaneemissionsinherefordsteers
AT cigandaveronicas associationbetweenresidualfeedintakeandentericmethaneemissionsinherefordsteers