Cargando…

Prevalence and lameness-associated risk factors in Alberta feedlot cattle

Lameness in cattle is a health and welfare concern; however, limited information is available on risk factors and the relationship between lameness and common diseases like bovine respiratory disease (BRD). Therefore, the objectives of this study were to: 1) identify prevalence of lameness in feedlo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Davis-Unger, Jessica, Schwartzkopf-Genswein, Karen S G, Pajor, Ed A, Hendrick, Steve, Marti, Sonia, Dorin, Craig, Orsel, Karin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7200549/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32704830
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/tas/txz008
_version_ 1783529357504937984
author Davis-Unger, Jessica
Schwartzkopf-Genswein, Karen S G
Pajor, Ed A
Hendrick, Steve
Marti, Sonia
Dorin, Craig
Orsel, Karin
author_facet Davis-Unger, Jessica
Schwartzkopf-Genswein, Karen S G
Pajor, Ed A
Hendrick, Steve
Marti, Sonia
Dorin, Craig
Orsel, Karin
author_sort Davis-Unger, Jessica
collection PubMed
description Lameness in cattle is a health and welfare concern; however, limited information is available on risk factors and the relationship between lameness and common diseases like bovine respiratory disease (BRD). Therefore, the objectives of this study were to: 1) identify prevalence of lameness in feedlot cattle and related risk factors of cattle diagnosed as lame; and 2) determine associations between BRD occurrence and lameness. Feedlot cattle health records were available from 28 feedlots for 10 yr. The data set consisted of 663,838 cattle records, with 13.9% (92,156) diagnosed with a disease, including 32.3%, 46.0%, and 22.0% with lameness, BRD, and other diagnoses, respectively. Lameness was classified into four categories: foot rot (FR), joint infections (JI), lame with no visible swelling (LNVS), and injuries (INJ), with a prevalence of 74.5%, 16.1%, 6.1%, and 3.1%, respectively. Lameness was compared across cattle types (arrival date and weight) as well as age classification (calf vs. yearling), gender (steer vs. heifer), and season of placement in the feedlot (spring, summer, fall, and winter). Within the disease-diagnosed population, lameness represented 28.5% of treated fall-placed calves, 38.5% of winter-placed calves, and 40.8% of treated yearlings. Foot rot was the most common diagnosis with 74.5% of all lameness diagnoses, with winter- and fall-placed calves more likely to be diagnosed with FR compared to yearlings (OR: 1.19, 95% CI: 1.10–1.30 and OR: 1.46, 95% CI: 1.38–1.55, respectively). Joint infections were the second most common diagnosis (16.1%). Compared to yearlings, fall-placed calves had a higher odds (OR: 3.64, 95% CI: 3.12–4.24) for JI. Injuries and LNVS were the least common but again fall-placed calves had higher odds of this diagnosis compared to yearlings (OR: 2.26, 95% CI: 1.70–2.99 and OR: 9.10, 95% CI: 6.26–13.2, respectively). Gender was significantly different for JI as steers were less likely affected compared to heifers (OR: 0.687, 95% CI: 0.545–0.867), and more likely affected by LNVS (OR: 2.46, 95% CI: 1.57–3.84). Of all lameness-associated deaths, JI accounted for almost 50%. Finally, cattle diagnosed with BRD were subsequently more likely to be diagnosed with INJ, JI, or LNVS (P < 0.001 for all comparisons). In conclusion, animal type and gender were associated with type of lameness diagnoses, allowing feedlots to allocate resources to groups at highest risk and focus on early intervention strategies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7200549
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72005492020-07-22 Prevalence and lameness-associated risk factors in Alberta feedlot cattle Davis-Unger, Jessica Schwartzkopf-Genswein, Karen S G Pajor, Ed A Hendrick, Steve Marti, Sonia Dorin, Craig Orsel, Karin Transl Anim Sci Animal Health And Well Being Lameness in cattle is a health and welfare concern; however, limited information is available on risk factors and the relationship between lameness and common diseases like bovine respiratory disease (BRD). Therefore, the objectives of this study were to: 1) identify prevalence of lameness in feedlot cattle and related risk factors of cattle diagnosed as lame; and 2) determine associations between BRD occurrence and lameness. Feedlot cattle health records were available from 28 feedlots for 10 yr. The data set consisted of 663,838 cattle records, with 13.9% (92,156) diagnosed with a disease, including 32.3%, 46.0%, and 22.0% with lameness, BRD, and other diagnoses, respectively. Lameness was classified into four categories: foot rot (FR), joint infections (JI), lame with no visible swelling (LNVS), and injuries (INJ), with a prevalence of 74.5%, 16.1%, 6.1%, and 3.1%, respectively. Lameness was compared across cattle types (arrival date and weight) as well as age classification (calf vs. yearling), gender (steer vs. heifer), and season of placement in the feedlot (spring, summer, fall, and winter). Within the disease-diagnosed population, lameness represented 28.5% of treated fall-placed calves, 38.5% of winter-placed calves, and 40.8% of treated yearlings. Foot rot was the most common diagnosis with 74.5% of all lameness diagnoses, with winter- and fall-placed calves more likely to be diagnosed with FR compared to yearlings (OR: 1.19, 95% CI: 1.10–1.30 and OR: 1.46, 95% CI: 1.38–1.55, respectively). Joint infections were the second most common diagnosis (16.1%). Compared to yearlings, fall-placed calves had a higher odds (OR: 3.64, 95% CI: 3.12–4.24) for JI. Injuries and LNVS were the least common but again fall-placed calves had higher odds of this diagnosis compared to yearlings (OR: 2.26, 95% CI: 1.70–2.99 and OR: 9.10, 95% CI: 6.26–13.2, respectively). Gender was significantly different for JI as steers were less likely affected compared to heifers (OR: 0.687, 95% CI: 0.545–0.867), and more likely affected by LNVS (OR: 2.46, 95% CI: 1.57–3.84). Of all lameness-associated deaths, JI accounted for almost 50%. Finally, cattle diagnosed with BRD were subsequently more likely to be diagnosed with INJ, JI, or LNVS (P < 0.001 for all comparisons). In conclusion, animal type and gender were associated with type of lameness diagnoses, allowing feedlots to allocate resources to groups at highest risk and focus on early intervention strategies. Oxford University Press 2019-03-13 /pmc/articles/PMC7200549/ /pubmed/32704830 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/tas/txz008 Text en © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society of Animal Science. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Animal Health And Well Being
Davis-Unger, Jessica
Schwartzkopf-Genswein, Karen S G
Pajor, Ed A
Hendrick, Steve
Marti, Sonia
Dorin, Craig
Orsel, Karin
Prevalence and lameness-associated risk factors in Alberta feedlot cattle
title Prevalence and lameness-associated risk factors in Alberta feedlot cattle
title_full Prevalence and lameness-associated risk factors in Alberta feedlot cattle
title_fullStr Prevalence and lameness-associated risk factors in Alberta feedlot cattle
title_full_unstemmed Prevalence and lameness-associated risk factors in Alberta feedlot cattle
title_short Prevalence and lameness-associated risk factors in Alberta feedlot cattle
title_sort prevalence and lameness-associated risk factors in alberta feedlot cattle
topic Animal Health And Well Being
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7200549/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32704830
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/tas/txz008
work_keys_str_mv AT davisungerjessica prevalenceandlamenessassociatedriskfactorsinalbertafeedlotcattle
AT schwartzkopfgensweinkarensg prevalenceandlamenessassociatedriskfactorsinalbertafeedlotcattle
AT pajoreda prevalenceandlamenessassociatedriskfactorsinalbertafeedlotcattle
AT hendricksteve prevalenceandlamenessassociatedriskfactorsinalbertafeedlotcattle
AT martisonia prevalenceandlamenessassociatedriskfactorsinalbertafeedlotcattle
AT dorincraig prevalenceandlamenessassociatedriskfactorsinalbertafeedlotcattle
AT orselkarin prevalenceandlamenessassociatedriskfactorsinalbertafeedlotcattle