Cargando…
The effect of zilpaterol hydrochloride on beef producer and processor revenue of calf-fed Holstein steers
A serial harvest was conducted every 28 d from 254 to 534 days on feed (DOF) to quantify changes in growth and composition of calf-fed Holstein steers (n = 110, initial BW = 449.2 ± 19.9 kg). One-half were supplemented the β-2 adrenergic agonist zilpaterol hydrochloride (ZH; 8.33 mg/kg 100% DM basis...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7200554/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32704713 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/tas/txy062 |
_version_ | 1783529358725480448 |
---|---|
author | McEvers, Trent J May, Nathan D Reed, Jacob A Walter, Lee-Anne J Hutcheson, John P Lawrence, Ty E |
author_facet | McEvers, Trent J May, Nathan D Reed, Jacob A Walter, Lee-Anne J Hutcheson, John P Lawrence, Ty E |
author_sort | McEvers, Trent J |
collection | PubMed |
description | A serial harvest was conducted every 28 d from 254 to 534 days on feed (DOF) to quantify changes in growth and composition of calf-fed Holstein steers (n = 110, initial BW = 449.2 ± 19.9 kg). One-half were supplemented the β-2 adrenergic agonist zilpaterol hydrochloride (ZH; 8.33 mg/kg 100% DM basis), and the remainder fed a control (CON) ration during the final 20 d followed by a 3 d withdrawal prior to harvest. Cattle were randomly allocated to dietary treatment and harvest endpoint (254, 282, 310, 338, 366, 394, 422, 450, 478, 506, and 534 DOF) using a 2 × 11 factorial treatment structure and a completely randomized experimental design structure. The objective of this ad-hoc investigation was to quantify changes in value across multiple harvest endpoints and marketing strategies for cattle supplemented with ZH. Cattle-fed ZH had increased (P < 0.01) value when sold on a dressed basis (+$82.64) or on a value-based formula (+$75.59) compared with CON cattle. No differences (P ≥ 0.14) were detected between ZH and CON carcasses for premiums and discounts related to HCW, yield grade, or quality grade. Moreover, no differences (P = 0.98) were detected for overall adjusted carcass value between ZH and CON carcasses. Fabrication values revealed that ZH carcasses had greater (P < 0.01) revenue than CON carcasses for primal round (+$36.23), loin (+$38.16), flank (+$8.95), rib (+$16.33), and chuck (+$27.49) regardless of DOF. Increased primal values ultimately led to greater (P < 0.01) processor revenue (+$138.94) and carcass value per 45.4 kg (+$6.45) for cattle-fed ZH compared with CON cattle. Overall, increased carcass weight and improved fabrication yield led to greater revenue at all harvest endpoints for cattle-fed ZH. Linear increases in live and dressed values indicated the daily change in live value was $3.48, which is less than an increase of $3.77 daily for dressed carcass value. Greater beef processor margin and profitability are expected when this growth technology is used. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7200554 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72005542020-07-22 The effect of zilpaterol hydrochloride on beef producer and processor revenue of calf-fed Holstein steers McEvers, Trent J May, Nathan D Reed, Jacob A Walter, Lee-Anne J Hutcheson, John P Lawrence, Ty E Transl Anim Sci Integrated Animal Science A serial harvest was conducted every 28 d from 254 to 534 days on feed (DOF) to quantify changes in growth and composition of calf-fed Holstein steers (n = 110, initial BW = 449.2 ± 19.9 kg). One-half were supplemented the β-2 adrenergic agonist zilpaterol hydrochloride (ZH; 8.33 mg/kg 100% DM basis), and the remainder fed a control (CON) ration during the final 20 d followed by a 3 d withdrawal prior to harvest. Cattle were randomly allocated to dietary treatment and harvest endpoint (254, 282, 310, 338, 366, 394, 422, 450, 478, 506, and 534 DOF) using a 2 × 11 factorial treatment structure and a completely randomized experimental design structure. The objective of this ad-hoc investigation was to quantify changes in value across multiple harvest endpoints and marketing strategies for cattle supplemented with ZH. Cattle-fed ZH had increased (P < 0.01) value when sold on a dressed basis (+$82.64) or on a value-based formula (+$75.59) compared with CON cattle. No differences (P ≥ 0.14) were detected between ZH and CON carcasses for premiums and discounts related to HCW, yield grade, or quality grade. Moreover, no differences (P = 0.98) were detected for overall adjusted carcass value between ZH and CON carcasses. Fabrication values revealed that ZH carcasses had greater (P < 0.01) revenue than CON carcasses for primal round (+$36.23), loin (+$38.16), flank (+$8.95), rib (+$16.33), and chuck (+$27.49) regardless of DOF. Increased primal values ultimately led to greater (P < 0.01) processor revenue (+$138.94) and carcass value per 45.4 kg (+$6.45) for cattle-fed ZH compared with CON cattle. Overall, increased carcass weight and improved fabrication yield led to greater revenue at all harvest endpoints for cattle-fed ZH. Linear increases in live and dressed values indicated the daily change in live value was $3.48, which is less than an increase of $3.77 daily for dressed carcass value. Greater beef processor margin and profitability are expected when this growth technology is used. Oxford University Press 2018-05-26 /pmc/articles/PMC7200554/ /pubmed/32704713 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/tas/txy062 Text en © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society of Animal Science. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Integrated Animal Science McEvers, Trent J May, Nathan D Reed, Jacob A Walter, Lee-Anne J Hutcheson, John P Lawrence, Ty E The effect of zilpaterol hydrochloride on beef producer and processor revenue of calf-fed Holstein steers |
title | The effect of zilpaterol hydrochloride on beef producer and processor revenue of calf-fed Holstein steers |
title_full | The effect of zilpaterol hydrochloride on beef producer and processor revenue of calf-fed Holstein steers |
title_fullStr | The effect of zilpaterol hydrochloride on beef producer and processor revenue of calf-fed Holstein steers |
title_full_unstemmed | The effect of zilpaterol hydrochloride on beef producer and processor revenue of calf-fed Holstein steers |
title_short | The effect of zilpaterol hydrochloride on beef producer and processor revenue of calf-fed Holstein steers |
title_sort | effect of zilpaterol hydrochloride on beef producer and processor revenue of calf-fed holstein steers |
topic | Integrated Animal Science |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7200554/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32704713 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/tas/txy062 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mceverstrentj theeffectofzilpaterolhydrochlorideonbeefproducerandprocessorrevenueofcalffedholsteinsteers AT maynathand theeffectofzilpaterolhydrochlorideonbeefproducerandprocessorrevenueofcalffedholsteinsteers AT reedjacoba theeffectofzilpaterolhydrochlorideonbeefproducerandprocessorrevenueofcalffedholsteinsteers AT walterleeannej theeffectofzilpaterolhydrochlorideonbeefproducerandprocessorrevenueofcalffedholsteinsteers AT hutchesonjohnp theeffectofzilpaterolhydrochlorideonbeefproducerandprocessorrevenueofcalffedholsteinsteers AT lawrencetye theeffectofzilpaterolhydrochlorideonbeefproducerandprocessorrevenueofcalffedholsteinsteers AT mceverstrentj effectofzilpaterolhydrochlorideonbeefproducerandprocessorrevenueofcalffedholsteinsteers AT maynathand effectofzilpaterolhydrochlorideonbeefproducerandprocessorrevenueofcalffedholsteinsteers AT reedjacoba effectofzilpaterolhydrochlorideonbeefproducerandprocessorrevenueofcalffedholsteinsteers AT walterleeannej effectofzilpaterolhydrochlorideonbeefproducerandprocessorrevenueofcalffedholsteinsteers AT hutchesonjohnp effectofzilpaterolhydrochlorideonbeefproducerandprocessorrevenueofcalffedholsteinsteers AT lawrencetye effectofzilpaterolhydrochlorideonbeefproducerandprocessorrevenueofcalffedholsteinsteers |