Cargando…
Sensor analysis and initial assessment of detectable first hoof contacts and last break-overs as unique signal fluctuations for equine gait analysis
The objective of the control study was to assess 2 prominent fluctuations in a single optical signal as being either a true first hoof contact or a last break-over based on descriptive measures. The study builds on initial findings from a preliminary investigation of the embedded-optical-base system...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7200566/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32704902 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/tas/txz089 |
_version_ | 1783529361377329152 |
---|---|
author | Atkins, Colton A Pond, Kevin R Madsen, Christi K Moorman, Valerie J Roman-Muniz, Ivette N Archibeque, Shawn L Grandin, Temple |
author_facet | Atkins, Colton A Pond, Kevin R Madsen, Christi K Moorman, Valerie J Roman-Muniz, Ivette N Archibeque, Shawn L Grandin, Temple |
author_sort | Atkins, Colton A |
collection | PubMed |
description | The objective of the control study was to assess 2 prominent fluctuations in a single optical signal as being either a true first hoof contact or a last break-over based on descriptive measures. The study builds on initial findings from a preliminary investigation of the embedded-optical-base system’s (EOBS) capabilities in signal capturing and feasibility as potential alternative to existing gait technologies, such as piezoelectric (e.g., load cell) systems. Hoof contacts and break-overs were measured (0 to 1 au; arbitrary units) using a 2.4-m (length) × 0.9-m (width) platform containing 1 EOBS. Three mixed-breed horses (n = 3) were injected with saline or either 100 IU or 200 IU Botox (i.e., onabotulinumtoxinA) with a 2.5-mL final volume. Injections were made into the deep digital flexor muscle at the motor end plates, with electromyography and ultrasound guidance. Horses were observed for 3 time points (pre-, post-, and recovery test days) over the span of a 4-mo period. Signal fluctuations [i.e., amplitude of hoof impacts based on true first hoof contacts (ΔS(TS)) and true last break-overs (ΔS(TL))] and kinematics [i.e., complete gait pass (CGP) time duration (T)] were recorded from each horse. Visual observations and video analysis were used for determining gait pattern categories. Individual horse measurements were analyzed for each trial, compared with video data and classified. Comparison of primary signal fluctuations (i.e., ΔS(TS) vs. ΔS(TL); forelimb vs. hindlimb) exhibited significant differences between hoof contacts and break-overs (P < 0.05). Right and left forelimb hoof contacts and hindlimb break-overs were not significantly different (P = 0.966; 0.063 ± 0.135; Estimate ± SE; P = 0.606; 0.176 ± 0.142; Estimate ± SE, respectively). Additionally, treatment vs. saline forelimbs did not exhibit significant difference (P = 0.7407; −0.098 ± 0.279; Estimate ± SE). Overall, data showed that the EOBS can collect repeatable and unique primary signal fluctuations as prominent and different gait measurements providing evidence to further development and research of the sensing system. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7200566 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72005662020-07-22 Sensor analysis and initial assessment of detectable first hoof contacts and last break-overs as unique signal fluctuations for equine gait analysis Atkins, Colton A Pond, Kevin R Madsen, Christi K Moorman, Valerie J Roman-Muniz, Ivette N Archibeque, Shawn L Grandin, Temple Transl Anim Sci Technology In Animal Science The objective of the control study was to assess 2 prominent fluctuations in a single optical signal as being either a true first hoof contact or a last break-over based on descriptive measures. The study builds on initial findings from a preliminary investigation of the embedded-optical-base system’s (EOBS) capabilities in signal capturing and feasibility as potential alternative to existing gait technologies, such as piezoelectric (e.g., load cell) systems. Hoof contacts and break-overs were measured (0 to 1 au; arbitrary units) using a 2.4-m (length) × 0.9-m (width) platform containing 1 EOBS. Three mixed-breed horses (n = 3) were injected with saline or either 100 IU or 200 IU Botox (i.e., onabotulinumtoxinA) with a 2.5-mL final volume. Injections were made into the deep digital flexor muscle at the motor end plates, with electromyography and ultrasound guidance. Horses were observed for 3 time points (pre-, post-, and recovery test days) over the span of a 4-mo period. Signal fluctuations [i.e., amplitude of hoof impacts based on true first hoof contacts (ΔS(TS)) and true last break-overs (ΔS(TL))] and kinematics [i.e., complete gait pass (CGP) time duration (T)] were recorded from each horse. Visual observations and video analysis were used for determining gait pattern categories. Individual horse measurements were analyzed for each trial, compared with video data and classified. Comparison of primary signal fluctuations (i.e., ΔS(TS) vs. ΔS(TL); forelimb vs. hindlimb) exhibited significant differences between hoof contacts and break-overs (P < 0.05). Right and left forelimb hoof contacts and hindlimb break-overs were not significantly different (P = 0.966; 0.063 ± 0.135; Estimate ± SE; P = 0.606; 0.176 ± 0.142; Estimate ± SE, respectively). Additionally, treatment vs. saline forelimbs did not exhibit significant difference (P = 0.7407; −0.098 ± 0.279; Estimate ± SE). Overall, data showed that the EOBS can collect repeatable and unique primary signal fluctuations as prominent and different gait measurements providing evidence to further development and research of the sensing system. Oxford University Press 2019-06-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7200566/ /pubmed/32704902 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/tas/txz089 Text en © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society of Animal Science. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Technology In Animal Science Atkins, Colton A Pond, Kevin R Madsen, Christi K Moorman, Valerie J Roman-Muniz, Ivette N Archibeque, Shawn L Grandin, Temple Sensor analysis and initial assessment of detectable first hoof contacts and last break-overs as unique signal fluctuations for equine gait analysis |
title | Sensor analysis and initial assessment of detectable first hoof contacts and last break-overs as unique signal fluctuations for equine gait analysis |
title_full | Sensor analysis and initial assessment of detectable first hoof contacts and last break-overs as unique signal fluctuations for equine gait analysis |
title_fullStr | Sensor analysis and initial assessment of detectable first hoof contacts and last break-overs as unique signal fluctuations for equine gait analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Sensor analysis and initial assessment of detectable first hoof contacts and last break-overs as unique signal fluctuations for equine gait analysis |
title_short | Sensor analysis and initial assessment of detectable first hoof contacts and last break-overs as unique signal fluctuations for equine gait analysis |
title_sort | sensor analysis and initial assessment of detectable first hoof contacts and last break-overs as unique signal fluctuations for equine gait analysis |
topic | Technology In Animal Science |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7200566/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32704902 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/tas/txz089 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT atkinscoltona sensoranalysisandinitialassessmentofdetectablefirsthoofcontactsandlastbreakoversasuniquesignalfluctuationsforequinegaitanalysis AT pondkevinr sensoranalysisandinitialassessmentofdetectablefirsthoofcontactsandlastbreakoversasuniquesignalfluctuationsforequinegaitanalysis AT madsenchristik sensoranalysisandinitialassessmentofdetectablefirsthoofcontactsandlastbreakoversasuniquesignalfluctuationsforequinegaitanalysis AT moormanvaleriej sensoranalysisandinitialassessmentofdetectablefirsthoofcontactsandlastbreakoversasuniquesignalfluctuationsforequinegaitanalysis AT romanmunizivetten sensoranalysisandinitialassessmentofdetectablefirsthoofcontactsandlastbreakoversasuniquesignalfluctuationsforequinegaitanalysis AT archibequeshawnl sensoranalysisandinitialassessmentofdetectablefirsthoofcontactsandlastbreakoversasuniquesignalfluctuationsforequinegaitanalysis AT grandintemple sensoranalysisandinitialassessmentofdetectablefirsthoofcontactsandlastbreakoversasuniquesignalfluctuationsforequinegaitanalysis |