Cargando…

Comparison of two anorganic bovine bone in maxillary sinus lift: a split-mouth study with clinical, radiographical, and histomorphometrical analysis

BACKGROUND: Anorganic bovine bone (Bio-Oss®) has been extensively used for reconstruction of posterior area of maxilla in sinus lift procedure; however, a new graft material (Lumina-Bone Porous®), that has a different manufacturing process, has not been yet compared in clinical and histological term...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: da Silva, Heitor Fontes, Goulart, Douglas Rangel, Sverzut, Alexander Tadeu, Olate, Sergio, de Moraes, Márcio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7200963/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32372226
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40729-020-00214-w
_version_ 1783529446392725504
author da Silva, Heitor Fontes
Goulart, Douglas Rangel
Sverzut, Alexander Tadeu
Olate, Sergio
de Moraes, Márcio
author_facet da Silva, Heitor Fontes
Goulart, Douglas Rangel
Sverzut, Alexander Tadeu
Olate, Sergio
de Moraes, Márcio
author_sort da Silva, Heitor Fontes
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Anorganic bovine bone (Bio-Oss®) has been extensively used for reconstruction of posterior area of maxilla in sinus lift procedure; however, a new graft material (Lumina-Bone Porous®), that has a different manufacturing process, has not been yet compared in clinical and histological terms. The manufacturing process of bovine bone graft is related to size and porosity of the particles, and this can change osteoconductive property of the material and bone formation. The use of Lumina-Porus® could improve bone formation, reduce the remaining particles of the biomaterial using a low-cost material. The aim of this research was to compare the clinical, radiological, and histomorphometrical results from maxillary sinus lift with two different anorganic bovine bone substitutes Bio-Oss® (control) and Lumina-Bone Porous® (test). RESULTS: A split-mouth study was performed with 13 volunteers. The mean bone ridge height in the deepest portion of maxillary sinuses floor was 3.11 ± 0.83 mm in the Bio-Oss® and 2.38 ± 0.75 mm in the Lumina-Bone Porous®. After sinus lift, the Bio-Oss® group shows bone ridge height of 11.56 ± 2.03 mm and Lumina-Bone® of 10.62 ± 1.93 mm. The increase in alveolar bone height scores was significant between pre-augmentation and 6 months after SL in both groups (p < 0.001). No statistical significant difference in newly formed bone in the Bio-Oss® group (20.4 ± 5.4%), and Lumina-Bone Porous® (22.8 ± 8.5%) was histomorphological observed (p > 0.05). On the other hand, the residual graft particles showed significant difference between the Bio-Oss® group (19.9 ± 8.6%) and Lumina-Bone Porous® (14.6 ± 5.6%) (p < 0.05). The survival rate of dental implants for augmented area with Lumina Bone Porous® was 88.88%, while for Bio-Oss® group was 100%. CONCLUSION: Both materials Bio-Oss® and Lumina-Bone Porous® can be used in the maxillary sinus floor augmentation with good predictability in clinical, radiographical, and histological point of view.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7200963
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72009632020-05-12 Comparison of two anorganic bovine bone in maxillary sinus lift: a split-mouth study with clinical, radiographical, and histomorphometrical analysis da Silva, Heitor Fontes Goulart, Douglas Rangel Sverzut, Alexander Tadeu Olate, Sergio de Moraes, Márcio Int J Implant Dent Research BACKGROUND: Anorganic bovine bone (Bio-Oss®) has been extensively used for reconstruction of posterior area of maxilla in sinus lift procedure; however, a new graft material (Lumina-Bone Porous®), that has a different manufacturing process, has not been yet compared in clinical and histological terms. The manufacturing process of bovine bone graft is related to size and porosity of the particles, and this can change osteoconductive property of the material and bone formation. The use of Lumina-Porus® could improve bone formation, reduce the remaining particles of the biomaterial using a low-cost material. The aim of this research was to compare the clinical, radiological, and histomorphometrical results from maxillary sinus lift with two different anorganic bovine bone substitutes Bio-Oss® (control) and Lumina-Bone Porous® (test). RESULTS: A split-mouth study was performed with 13 volunteers. The mean bone ridge height in the deepest portion of maxillary sinuses floor was 3.11 ± 0.83 mm in the Bio-Oss® and 2.38 ± 0.75 mm in the Lumina-Bone Porous®. After sinus lift, the Bio-Oss® group shows bone ridge height of 11.56 ± 2.03 mm and Lumina-Bone® of 10.62 ± 1.93 mm. The increase in alveolar bone height scores was significant between pre-augmentation and 6 months after SL in both groups (p < 0.001). No statistical significant difference in newly formed bone in the Bio-Oss® group (20.4 ± 5.4%), and Lumina-Bone Porous® (22.8 ± 8.5%) was histomorphological observed (p > 0.05). On the other hand, the residual graft particles showed significant difference between the Bio-Oss® group (19.9 ± 8.6%) and Lumina-Bone Porous® (14.6 ± 5.6%) (p < 0.05). The survival rate of dental implants for augmented area with Lumina Bone Porous® was 88.88%, while for Bio-Oss® group was 100%. CONCLUSION: Both materials Bio-Oss® and Lumina-Bone Porous® can be used in the maxillary sinus floor augmentation with good predictability in clinical, radiographical, and histological point of view. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-05-06 /pmc/articles/PMC7200963/ /pubmed/32372226 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40729-020-00214-w Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Research
da Silva, Heitor Fontes
Goulart, Douglas Rangel
Sverzut, Alexander Tadeu
Olate, Sergio
de Moraes, Márcio
Comparison of two anorganic bovine bone in maxillary sinus lift: a split-mouth study with clinical, radiographical, and histomorphometrical analysis
title Comparison of two anorganic bovine bone in maxillary sinus lift: a split-mouth study with clinical, radiographical, and histomorphometrical analysis
title_full Comparison of two anorganic bovine bone in maxillary sinus lift: a split-mouth study with clinical, radiographical, and histomorphometrical analysis
title_fullStr Comparison of two anorganic bovine bone in maxillary sinus lift: a split-mouth study with clinical, radiographical, and histomorphometrical analysis
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of two anorganic bovine bone in maxillary sinus lift: a split-mouth study with clinical, radiographical, and histomorphometrical analysis
title_short Comparison of two anorganic bovine bone in maxillary sinus lift: a split-mouth study with clinical, radiographical, and histomorphometrical analysis
title_sort comparison of two anorganic bovine bone in maxillary sinus lift: a split-mouth study with clinical, radiographical, and histomorphometrical analysis
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7200963/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32372226
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40729-020-00214-w
work_keys_str_mv AT dasilvaheitorfontes comparisonoftwoanorganicbovineboneinmaxillarysinusliftasplitmouthstudywithclinicalradiographicalandhistomorphometricalanalysis
AT goulartdouglasrangel comparisonoftwoanorganicbovineboneinmaxillarysinusliftasplitmouthstudywithclinicalradiographicalandhistomorphometricalanalysis
AT sverzutalexandertadeu comparisonoftwoanorganicbovineboneinmaxillarysinusliftasplitmouthstudywithclinicalradiographicalandhistomorphometricalanalysis
AT olatesergio comparisonoftwoanorganicbovineboneinmaxillarysinusliftasplitmouthstudywithclinicalradiographicalandhistomorphometricalanalysis
AT demoraesmarcio comparisonoftwoanorganicbovineboneinmaxillarysinusliftasplitmouthstudywithclinicalradiographicalandhistomorphometricalanalysis