Cargando…

Starch characterization of commercial extruded dry pet foods

Starches provide an effective energy source for dogs and cats and can affect health according to its inclusion and extent of digestion. The starch fraction that escapes small intestine (SI) digestion is called resistant starch (RS) and is desirable due to its prebiotic function. Starch is not an ess...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Corsato Alvarenga, Isabella, Aldrich, Charles G
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7201077/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32705018
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/tas/txaa018
_version_ 1783529471212519424
author Corsato Alvarenga, Isabella
Aldrich, Charles G
author_facet Corsato Alvarenga, Isabella
Aldrich, Charles G
author_sort Corsato Alvarenga, Isabella
collection PubMed
description Starches provide an effective energy source for dogs and cats and can affect health according to its inclusion and extent of digestion. The starch fraction that escapes small intestine (SI) digestion is called resistant starch (RS) and is desirable due to its prebiotic function. Starch is not an essential nutrient for dogs and cats and thus is not reported on commercial pet food labels. Hence, the objective of this work was to characterize starches in commercial pet foods. The top five pet food companies by sales were selected to represent U.S. pet foods, which were divided into four strata with a sampling frame of 654 foods: dog grain based (372 foods), dog grain free (71 foods), cat grain based (175 foods), and cat grain free (38 foods). Five random foods within each stratum were purchased (20 total). Starch analyses (total starch, resistant starch, and starch cook), as well as nutrient analyses were conducted on all foods. Total starch, RS, and starch cook means were compared using a two-group Z-test on dog vs. cat and grain-based (GB) vs. grain-free (GF) diets, and differences were considered significant at a P < 0.05. Total starch was higher (P < 0.05) in dog than cat food, and starch cook was greater (P < 0.05) in GF diets. A regression analysis showed that nitrogen-free extract was a good predictor of total starch. Resistant starch was low and not different among groups. A post hoc test showed that a total sample size of at least 28 diets per group would be required to detect differences in RS between GF and GB diets, if one exists.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7201077
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72010772020-07-22 Starch characterization of commercial extruded dry pet foods Corsato Alvarenga, Isabella Aldrich, Charles G Transl Anim Sci Companion Animal Nutrition Starches provide an effective energy source for dogs and cats and can affect health according to its inclusion and extent of digestion. The starch fraction that escapes small intestine (SI) digestion is called resistant starch (RS) and is desirable due to its prebiotic function. Starch is not an essential nutrient for dogs and cats and thus is not reported on commercial pet food labels. Hence, the objective of this work was to characterize starches in commercial pet foods. The top five pet food companies by sales were selected to represent U.S. pet foods, which were divided into four strata with a sampling frame of 654 foods: dog grain based (372 foods), dog grain free (71 foods), cat grain based (175 foods), and cat grain free (38 foods). Five random foods within each stratum were purchased (20 total). Starch analyses (total starch, resistant starch, and starch cook), as well as nutrient analyses were conducted on all foods. Total starch, RS, and starch cook means were compared using a two-group Z-test on dog vs. cat and grain-based (GB) vs. grain-free (GF) diets, and differences were considered significant at a P < 0.05. Total starch was higher (P < 0.05) in dog than cat food, and starch cook was greater (P < 0.05) in GF diets. A regression analysis showed that nitrogen-free extract was a good predictor of total starch. Resistant starch was low and not different among groups. A post hoc test showed that a total sample size of at least 28 diets per group would be required to detect differences in RS between GF and GB diets, if one exists. Oxford University Press 2020-02-14 /pmc/articles/PMC7201077/ /pubmed/32705018 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/tas/txaa018 Text en © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society of Animal Science. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Companion Animal Nutrition
Corsato Alvarenga, Isabella
Aldrich, Charles G
Starch characterization of commercial extruded dry pet foods
title Starch characterization of commercial extruded dry pet foods
title_full Starch characterization of commercial extruded dry pet foods
title_fullStr Starch characterization of commercial extruded dry pet foods
title_full_unstemmed Starch characterization of commercial extruded dry pet foods
title_short Starch characterization of commercial extruded dry pet foods
title_sort starch characterization of commercial extruded dry pet foods
topic Companion Animal Nutrition
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7201077/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32705018
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/tas/txaa018
work_keys_str_mv AT corsatoalvarengaisabella starchcharacterizationofcommercialextrudeddrypetfoods
AT aldrichcharlesg starchcharacterizationofcommercialextrudeddrypetfoods