Cargando…
Evaluation of Accuracy and Reliability of a Mobile Screening Audiometer in Normal Hearing Adults
Quantifying hearing thresholds via mobile self-assessment audiometric applications has been demonstrated repeatedly with heterogenous results regarding the accuracy. One important limitation of several of these applications has been the lack of appropriate calibration of their core technical compone...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7201107/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32411050 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00744 |
_version_ | 1783529477867831296 |
---|---|
author | Colsman, Angela Supp, Gernot G. Neumann, Joachim Schneider, Till R. |
author_facet | Colsman, Angela Supp, Gernot G. Neumann, Joachim Schneider, Till R. |
author_sort | Colsman, Angela |
collection | PubMed |
description | Quantifying hearing thresholds via mobile self-assessment audiometric applications has been demonstrated repeatedly with heterogenous results regarding the accuracy. One important limitation of several of these applications has been the lack of appropriate calibration of their core technical components (sound generator and headphones). The current study aimed at evaluating accuracy and reliability of a calibrated application (app) for pure-tone screening audiometry by self-assessment on a tablet computer: Audimatch app installed on Apple iPad 4 in combination with Sennheiser HDA-280 headphones. In a repeated-measures design audiometric thresholds collected by the app were compared to those obtained by standardized automated audiometry and additionally test-retest reliability was evaluated. Sixty-eight participants aged 19–65 years with normal hearing were tested in a sound-attenuating booth. An equivalence test revealed highly similar hearing thresholds for the app compared with standardized automated audiometry. A test-retest reliability analysis within each method showed a high correlation coefficient for the app (Spearman rank correlation: rho = 0.829) and for the automated audiometer (rho = 0.792). The results imply that the self-assessment of audiometric thresholds via a calibrated mobile device represents a valid and reliable alternative for stationary assessment of hearing loss thresholds, supporting the potential usability within the area of occupational health care. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7201107 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72011072020-05-14 Evaluation of Accuracy and Reliability of a Mobile Screening Audiometer in Normal Hearing Adults Colsman, Angela Supp, Gernot G. Neumann, Joachim Schneider, Till R. Front Psychol Psychology Quantifying hearing thresholds via mobile self-assessment audiometric applications has been demonstrated repeatedly with heterogenous results regarding the accuracy. One important limitation of several of these applications has been the lack of appropriate calibration of their core technical components (sound generator and headphones). The current study aimed at evaluating accuracy and reliability of a calibrated application (app) for pure-tone screening audiometry by self-assessment on a tablet computer: Audimatch app installed on Apple iPad 4 in combination with Sennheiser HDA-280 headphones. In a repeated-measures design audiometric thresholds collected by the app were compared to those obtained by standardized automated audiometry and additionally test-retest reliability was evaluated. Sixty-eight participants aged 19–65 years with normal hearing were tested in a sound-attenuating booth. An equivalence test revealed highly similar hearing thresholds for the app compared with standardized automated audiometry. A test-retest reliability analysis within each method showed a high correlation coefficient for the app (Spearman rank correlation: rho = 0.829) and for the automated audiometer (rho = 0.792). The results imply that the self-assessment of audiometric thresholds via a calibrated mobile device represents a valid and reliable alternative for stationary assessment of hearing loss thresholds, supporting the potential usability within the area of occupational health care. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-04-29 /pmc/articles/PMC7201107/ /pubmed/32411050 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00744 Text en Copyright © 2020 Colsman, Supp, Neumann and Schneider. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Psychology Colsman, Angela Supp, Gernot G. Neumann, Joachim Schneider, Till R. Evaluation of Accuracy and Reliability of a Mobile Screening Audiometer in Normal Hearing Adults |
title | Evaluation of Accuracy and Reliability of a Mobile Screening Audiometer in Normal Hearing Adults |
title_full | Evaluation of Accuracy and Reliability of a Mobile Screening Audiometer in Normal Hearing Adults |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of Accuracy and Reliability of a Mobile Screening Audiometer in Normal Hearing Adults |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of Accuracy and Reliability of a Mobile Screening Audiometer in Normal Hearing Adults |
title_short | Evaluation of Accuracy and Reliability of a Mobile Screening Audiometer in Normal Hearing Adults |
title_sort | evaluation of accuracy and reliability of a mobile screening audiometer in normal hearing adults |
topic | Psychology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7201107/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32411050 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00744 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT colsmanangela evaluationofaccuracyandreliabilityofamobilescreeningaudiometerinnormalhearingadults AT suppgernotg evaluationofaccuracyandreliabilityofamobilescreeningaudiometerinnormalhearingadults AT neumannjoachim evaluationofaccuracyandreliabilityofamobilescreeningaudiometerinnormalhearingadults AT schneidertillr evaluationofaccuracyandreliabilityofamobilescreeningaudiometerinnormalhearingadults |