Cargando…

Inequality of opportunity in healthcare expenditures: evidence from China

BACKGROUND: The theory of equality of opportunity attributes total inequality to effort levels and circumstance factors. Inequality attributable to circumstance is defined as inequality of opportunity (IOp), namely inequity. Many studies have been pursued in this area but few concerning health care,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Yuyang, Coyte, Peter C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7201537/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32375758
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-05252-z
_version_ 1783529554234572800
author Zhang, Yuyang
Coyte, Peter C.
author_facet Zhang, Yuyang
Coyte, Peter C.
author_sort Zhang, Yuyang
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The theory of equality of opportunity attributes total inequality to effort levels and circumstance factors. Inequality attributable to circumstance is defined as inequality of opportunity (IOp), namely inequity. Many studies have been pursued in this area but few concerning health care, especially in China. Despite Chinese health system reforms, healthcare inequity remains. This study explores the extent and sources of IOp in outpatient and inpatient expenditures in China. METHODS: We used three waves (2011, 2013 and 2015) of data from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study that offer a nationally representative sample of Chinese residents aged 45 and older. Based on a pooled regression model, we estimated the contribution of circumstance factors to the inequality in outpatient and inpatient expenditures by defining a counterfactual distribution. The “circumstance-free effort” was introduced to deal with the correlation between circumstance and effort. RESULTS: We report a decline in inequity from 2011 to 2015, and the IOp ratio to total inequality in outpatient and inpatient expenditures decreased 9.4% (from 28.6 to 25.9%) and 3.3% (from 49.1 to 47.5%), respectively. Social background, medical supply-side factors, including the type of basic medical insurance, region and community medical resources were important sources of IOp in outpatient and inpatient expenditures. CONCLUSIONS: These findings provide information on which to base policies designed to reduce inequity in healthcare expenditures. It is necessary to transfer more subsidies to the New Co-operative Medical System, and to address the uneven regional distribution of medical resources. Additionally, increasing access to quality primary community clinics may be a pro-poor policy to alleviate inequity in the use of outpatient care. Compared to outpatient services, policies protecting vulnerable populations need to pay more attention to the financing and design of inpatient services.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7201537
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72015372020-05-08 Inequality of opportunity in healthcare expenditures: evidence from China Zhang, Yuyang Coyte, Peter C. BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: The theory of equality of opportunity attributes total inequality to effort levels and circumstance factors. Inequality attributable to circumstance is defined as inequality of opportunity (IOp), namely inequity. Many studies have been pursued in this area but few concerning health care, especially in China. Despite Chinese health system reforms, healthcare inequity remains. This study explores the extent and sources of IOp in outpatient and inpatient expenditures in China. METHODS: We used three waves (2011, 2013 and 2015) of data from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study that offer a nationally representative sample of Chinese residents aged 45 and older. Based on a pooled regression model, we estimated the contribution of circumstance factors to the inequality in outpatient and inpatient expenditures by defining a counterfactual distribution. The “circumstance-free effort” was introduced to deal with the correlation between circumstance and effort. RESULTS: We report a decline in inequity from 2011 to 2015, and the IOp ratio to total inequality in outpatient and inpatient expenditures decreased 9.4% (from 28.6 to 25.9%) and 3.3% (from 49.1 to 47.5%), respectively. Social background, medical supply-side factors, including the type of basic medical insurance, region and community medical resources were important sources of IOp in outpatient and inpatient expenditures. CONCLUSIONS: These findings provide information on which to base policies designed to reduce inequity in healthcare expenditures. It is necessary to transfer more subsidies to the New Co-operative Medical System, and to address the uneven regional distribution of medical resources. Additionally, increasing access to quality primary community clinics may be a pro-poor policy to alleviate inequity in the use of outpatient care. Compared to outpatient services, policies protecting vulnerable populations need to pay more attention to the financing and design of inpatient services. BioMed Central 2020-05-06 /pmc/articles/PMC7201537/ /pubmed/32375758 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-05252-z Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Zhang, Yuyang
Coyte, Peter C.
Inequality of opportunity in healthcare expenditures: evidence from China
title Inequality of opportunity in healthcare expenditures: evidence from China
title_full Inequality of opportunity in healthcare expenditures: evidence from China
title_fullStr Inequality of opportunity in healthcare expenditures: evidence from China
title_full_unstemmed Inequality of opportunity in healthcare expenditures: evidence from China
title_short Inequality of opportunity in healthcare expenditures: evidence from China
title_sort inequality of opportunity in healthcare expenditures: evidence from china
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7201537/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32375758
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-05252-z
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangyuyang inequalityofopportunityinhealthcareexpendituresevidencefromchina
AT coytepeterc inequalityofopportunityinhealthcareexpendituresevidencefromchina