Cargando…
New Potential Weapons for Refractory Scleritis in the Era of Targeted Therapy
OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy of biologic drugs, beyond tumor necrosis factor- (TNF-) α inhibitors, in the management of noninfectious refractory scleritis, either idiopathic or associated with systemic immune-mediated disorders. Patients and Methods. This is a retrospective study assessing the...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7201583/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32410867 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/8294560 |
_version_ | 1783529564659515392 |
---|---|
author | Fabiani, Claudia Sota, Jurgen Sainz-de-la-Maza, Maite Pelegrín, Laura Emmi, Giacomo Lopalco, Giuseppe Iannone, Florenzo Vannozzi, Lorenzo Guerriero, Silvana Gelmi, Maria Chiara Rigante, Donato Tosi, Gian Marco Hernández-Rodríguez, José Cantarini, Luca |
author_facet | Fabiani, Claudia Sota, Jurgen Sainz-de-la-Maza, Maite Pelegrín, Laura Emmi, Giacomo Lopalco, Giuseppe Iannone, Florenzo Vannozzi, Lorenzo Guerriero, Silvana Gelmi, Maria Chiara Rigante, Donato Tosi, Gian Marco Hernández-Rodríguez, José Cantarini, Luca |
author_sort | Fabiani, Claudia |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy of biologic drugs, beyond tumor necrosis factor- (TNF-) α inhibitors, in the management of noninfectious refractory scleritis, either idiopathic or associated with systemic immune-mediated disorders. Patients and Methods. This is a retrospective study assessing the efficacy of several biologic agents (rituximab, anakinra, tocilizumab, and abatacept) and the small molecule tofacitinib in the treatment of scleritis through assessment of scleral inflammation and relapses, as well as treatment impact on best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and safety profile. RESULTS: Fourteen patients (19 eyes) were enrolled in the study. Scleritis inflammatory grading significantly improved from baseline to 3 months (p = 0.002) and from baseline to the last follow-up visit (p = 0.002). Scleritis relapses significantly decreased between the 12 months preceding and following biologic therapy (p = 0.007). No differences regarding BCVA were observed (p = 0.67). Regarding adverse events, only one patient developed pneumonia and septic shock under rituximab treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Our results, though limited to a low number of patients, highlight the effectiveness of different biologic therapies in the treatment of noninfectious refractory scleritis, showing to control scleral inflammation and allowing a significant reduction in the number of relapses. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7201583 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Hindawi |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72015832020-05-14 New Potential Weapons for Refractory Scleritis in the Era of Targeted Therapy Fabiani, Claudia Sota, Jurgen Sainz-de-la-Maza, Maite Pelegrín, Laura Emmi, Giacomo Lopalco, Giuseppe Iannone, Florenzo Vannozzi, Lorenzo Guerriero, Silvana Gelmi, Maria Chiara Rigante, Donato Tosi, Gian Marco Hernández-Rodríguez, José Cantarini, Luca Mediators Inflamm Research Article OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy of biologic drugs, beyond tumor necrosis factor- (TNF-) α inhibitors, in the management of noninfectious refractory scleritis, either idiopathic or associated with systemic immune-mediated disorders. Patients and Methods. This is a retrospective study assessing the efficacy of several biologic agents (rituximab, anakinra, tocilizumab, and abatacept) and the small molecule tofacitinib in the treatment of scleritis through assessment of scleral inflammation and relapses, as well as treatment impact on best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and safety profile. RESULTS: Fourteen patients (19 eyes) were enrolled in the study. Scleritis inflammatory grading significantly improved from baseline to 3 months (p = 0.002) and from baseline to the last follow-up visit (p = 0.002). Scleritis relapses significantly decreased between the 12 months preceding and following biologic therapy (p = 0.007). No differences regarding BCVA were observed (p = 0.67). Regarding adverse events, only one patient developed pneumonia and septic shock under rituximab treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Our results, though limited to a low number of patients, highlight the effectiveness of different biologic therapies in the treatment of noninfectious refractory scleritis, showing to control scleral inflammation and allowing a significant reduction in the number of relapses. Hindawi 2020-01-17 /pmc/articles/PMC7201583/ /pubmed/32410867 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/8294560 Text en Copyright © 2020 Claudia Fabiani et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Fabiani, Claudia Sota, Jurgen Sainz-de-la-Maza, Maite Pelegrín, Laura Emmi, Giacomo Lopalco, Giuseppe Iannone, Florenzo Vannozzi, Lorenzo Guerriero, Silvana Gelmi, Maria Chiara Rigante, Donato Tosi, Gian Marco Hernández-Rodríguez, José Cantarini, Luca New Potential Weapons for Refractory Scleritis in the Era of Targeted Therapy |
title | New Potential Weapons for Refractory Scleritis in the Era of Targeted Therapy |
title_full | New Potential Weapons for Refractory Scleritis in the Era of Targeted Therapy |
title_fullStr | New Potential Weapons for Refractory Scleritis in the Era of Targeted Therapy |
title_full_unstemmed | New Potential Weapons for Refractory Scleritis in the Era of Targeted Therapy |
title_short | New Potential Weapons for Refractory Scleritis in the Era of Targeted Therapy |
title_sort | new potential weapons for refractory scleritis in the era of targeted therapy |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7201583/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32410867 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/8294560 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fabianiclaudia newpotentialweaponsforrefractoryscleritisintheeraoftargetedtherapy AT sotajurgen newpotentialweaponsforrefractoryscleritisintheeraoftargetedtherapy AT sainzdelamazamaite newpotentialweaponsforrefractoryscleritisintheeraoftargetedtherapy AT pelegrinlaura newpotentialweaponsforrefractoryscleritisintheeraoftargetedtherapy AT emmigiacomo newpotentialweaponsforrefractoryscleritisintheeraoftargetedtherapy AT lopalcogiuseppe newpotentialweaponsforrefractoryscleritisintheeraoftargetedtherapy AT iannoneflorenzo newpotentialweaponsforrefractoryscleritisintheeraoftargetedtherapy AT vannozzilorenzo newpotentialweaponsforrefractoryscleritisintheeraoftargetedtherapy AT guerrierosilvana newpotentialweaponsforrefractoryscleritisintheeraoftargetedtherapy AT gelmimariachiara newpotentialweaponsforrefractoryscleritisintheeraoftargetedtherapy AT rigantedonato newpotentialweaponsforrefractoryscleritisintheeraoftargetedtherapy AT tosigianmarco newpotentialweaponsforrefractoryscleritisintheeraoftargetedtherapy AT hernandezrodriguezjose newpotentialweaponsforrefractoryscleritisintheeraoftargetedtherapy AT cantariniluca newpotentialweaponsforrefractoryscleritisintheeraoftargetedtherapy |