Cargando…
Chagas vectors Panstrongylus chinai (Del Ponte, 1929) and Panstrongylus howardi (Neiva, 1911): chromatic forms or true species?
BACKGROUND: Chagas disease is a parasitic infection transmitted by “kissing bugs” (Hemiptera: Reduviidae: Triatominae) that has a huge economic impact in Latin American countries. The vector species with the upmost epidemiological importance in Ecuador are Rhodnius ecuadoriensis (Lent & Leon, 19...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7201598/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32375868 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13071-020-04097-z |
_version_ | 1783529567727648768 |
---|---|
author | Villacís, Anita G. Dujardin, Jean-Pierre Panzera, Francisco Yumiseva, César A. Pita, Sebastián Santillán-Guayasamín, Soledad Orozco, Marco I. Mosquera, Katherine D. Grijalva, Mario J. |
author_facet | Villacís, Anita G. Dujardin, Jean-Pierre Panzera, Francisco Yumiseva, César A. Pita, Sebastián Santillán-Guayasamín, Soledad Orozco, Marco I. Mosquera, Katherine D. Grijalva, Mario J. |
author_sort | Villacís, Anita G. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Chagas disease is a parasitic infection transmitted by “kissing bugs” (Hemiptera: Reduviidae: Triatominae) that has a huge economic impact in Latin American countries. The vector species with the upmost epidemiological importance in Ecuador are Rhodnius ecuadoriensis (Lent & Leon, 1958) and Triatoma dimidiata (Latreille, 1811). However, other species such as Panstrongylus howardi (Neiva, 1911) and Panstrongylus chinai (Del Ponte, 1929) act as secondary vectors due to their growing adaptation to domestic structures and their ability to transmit the parasite to humans. The latter two taxa are distributed in two different regions, they are allopatric and differ mainly by their general color. Their relative morphological similarity led some authors to suspect that P. chinai is a melanic form of P. howardi. METHODS: The present study explored this question using different approaches: antennal phenotype; geometric morphometrics of heads, wings and eggs; cytogenetics; molecular genetics; experimental crosses; and ecological niche modeling. RESULTS: The antennal morphology, geometric morphometrics of head and wing shape and cytogenetic analysis were unable to show distinct differences between the two taxa. However, geometric morphometrics of the eggs, molecular genetics, ecological niche modeling and experimental crosses including chromosomal analyses of the F1 hybrids, in addition to their coloration and current distribution support the hypothesis that P. chinai and P. howardi are separate species. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the evidence provided here, P. howardi and P. chinai should not be synonymized. They represent two valid, closely related species. [Image: see text] |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7201598 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72015982020-05-08 Chagas vectors Panstrongylus chinai (Del Ponte, 1929) and Panstrongylus howardi (Neiva, 1911): chromatic forms or true species? Villacís, Anita G. Dujardin, Jean-Pierre Panzera, Francisco Yumiseva, César A. Pita, Sebastián Santillán-Guayasamín, Soledad Orozco, Marco I. Mosquera, Katherine D. Grijalva, Mario J. Parasit Vectors Research BACKGROUND: Chagas disease is a parasitic infection transmitted by “kissing bugs” (Hemiptera: Reduviidae: Triatominae) that has a huge economic impact in Latin American countries. The vector species with the upmost epidemiological importance in Ecuador are Rhodnius ecuadoriensis (Lent & Leon, 1958) and Triatoma dimidiata (Latreille, 1811). However, other species such as Panstrongylus howardi (Neiva, 1911) and Panstrongylus chinai (Del Ponte, 1929) act as secondary vectors due to their growing adaptation to domestic structures and their ability to transmit the parasite to humans. The latter two taxa are distributed in two different regions, they are allopatric and differ mainly by their general color. Their relative morphological similarity led some authors to suspect that P. chinai is a melanic form of P. howardi. METHODS: The present study explored this question using different approaches: antennal phenotype; geometric morphometrics of heads, wings and eggs; cytogenetics; molecular genetics; experimental crosses; and ecological niche modeling. RESULTS: The antennal morphology, geometric morphometrics of head and wing shape and cytogenetic analysis were unable to show distinct differences between the two taxa. However, geometric morphometrics of the eggs, molecular genetics, ecological niche modeling and experimental crosses including chromosomal analyses of the F1 hybrids, in addition to their coloration and current distribution support the hypothesis that P. chinai and P. howardi are separate species. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the evidence provided here, P. howardi and P. chinai should not be synonymized. They represent two valid, closely related species. [Image: see text] BioMed Central 2020-05-06 /pmc/articles/PMC7201598/ /pubmed/32375868 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13071-020-04097-z Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Villacís, Anita G. Dujardin, Jean-Pierre Panzera, Francisco Yumiseva, César A. Pita, Sebastián Santillán-Guayasamín, Soledad Orozco, Marco I. Mosquera, Katherine D. Grijalva, Mario J. Chagas vectors Panstrongylus chinai (Del Ponte, 1929) and Panstrongylus howardi (Neiva, 1911): chromatic forms or true species? |
title | Chagas vectors Panstrongylus chinai (Del Ponte, 1929) and Panstrongylus howardi (Neiva, 1911): chromatic forms or true species? |
title_full | Chagas vectors Panstrongylus chinai (Del Ponte, 1929) and Panstrongylus howardi (Neiva, 1911): chromatic forms or true species? |
title_fullStr | Chagas vectors Panstrongylus chinai (Del Ponte, 1929) and Panstrongylus howardi (Neiva, 1911): chromatic forms or true species? |
title_full_unstemmed | Chagas vectors Panstrongylus chinai (Del Ponte, 1929) and Panstrongylus howardi (Neiva, 1911): chromatic forms or true species? |
title_short | Chagas vectors Panstrongylus chinai (Del Ponte, 1929) and Panstrongylus howardi (Neiva, 1911): chromatic forms or true species? |
title_sort | chagas vectors panstrongylus chinai (del ponte, 1929) and panstrongylus howardi (neiva, 1911): chromatic forms or true species? |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7201598/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32375868 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13071-020-04097-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT villacisanitag chagasvectorspanstrongyluschinaidelponte1929andpanstrongylushowardineiva1911chromaticformsortruespecies AT dujardinjeanpierre chagasvectorspanstrongyluschinaidelponte1929andpanstrongylushowardineiva1911chromaticformsortruespecies AT panzerafrancisco chagasvectorspanstrongyluschinaidelponte1929andpanstrongylushowardineiva1911chromaticformsortruespecies AT yumisevacesara chagasvectorspanstrongyluschinaidelponte1929andpanstrongylushowardineiva1911chromaticformsortruespecies AT pitasebastian chagasvectorspanstrongyluschinaidelponte1929andpanstrongylushowardineiva1911chromaticformsortruespecies AT santillanguayasaminsoledad chagasvectorspanstrongyluschinaidelponte1929andpanstrongylushowardineiva1911chromaticformsortruespecies AT orozcomarcoi chagasvectorspanstrongyluschinaidelponte1929andpanstrongylushowardineiva1911chromaticformsortruespecies AT mosquerakatherined chagasvectorspanstrongyluschinaidelponte1929andpanstrongylushowardineiva1911chromaticformsortruespecies AT grijalvamarioj chagasvectorspanstrongyluschinaidelponte1929andpanstrongylushowardineiva1911chromaticformsortruespecies |