Cargando…

Lower maximum forces on oral structures when using gum-elastic bougie than when using endotracheal tube and stylet during both direct and indirect laryngoscopy by novices: a crossover study using a high-fidelity simulator

BACKGROUND: Applying excessive force during endotracheal intubation (ETI) is associated with several complications, including dental trauma and hemodynamic alterations. A gum-elastic bougie (GEB), a type of tracheal tube introducer, is a useful airway adjunct for patients with poor laryngoscopic vie...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ono, Yuko, Shinohara, Kazuaki, Shimada, Jiro, Inoue, Shigeaki, Kotani, Joji
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7201614/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32375651
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12873-020-00328-9
_version_ 1783529571231989760
author Ono, Yuko
Shinohara, Kazuaki
Shimada, Jiro
Inoue, Shigeaki
Kotani, Joji
author_facet Ono, Yuko
Shinohara, Kazuaki
Shimada, Jiro
Inoue, Shigeaki
Kotani, Joji
author_sort Ono, Yuko
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Applying excessive force during endotracheal intubation (ETI) is associated with several complications, including dental trauma and hemodynamic alterations. A gum-elastic bougie (GEB), a type of tracheal tube introducer, is a useful airway adjunct for patients with poor laryngoscopic views. However, how the use of a GEB affects the force applied during laryngoscopy is unclear. We compared the force applied on the oral structures during ETI performed by novices using the GEB versus an endotracheal tube + stylet. METHODS: This prospective crossover study was conducted from April 2017 to March 2019 in a public medical university in Japan. In total, 209 medical students (4th and 5th grade, mean age of 23.7 ± 2.0 years) without clinical ETI experience were recruited. The participants used either a Macintosh direct laryngoscope (DL) or C-MAC video laryngoscope (VL) in combination with a GEB or stylet to perform ETI on a high-fidelity airway management simulator. The order of the first ETI method was randomized to minimize the learning curve effect. The outcomes of interest were the maximum forces applied on the maxillary incisors and tongue during laryngoscopy. The implanted sensors in the simulator quantified these forces automatically. RESULTS: The maximum force applied on the maxillary incisors was significantly lower when using a GEB than when using an endotracheal tube + stylet both with the Macintosh DL (39.0 ± 23.3 vs. 47.4 ± 32.6 N, P < 0.001) and C-MAC VL (38.9 ± 18.6 vs. 42.0 ± 22.1 N, P < 0.001). Similarly, the force applied on the tongue was significantly lower when using a GEB than when using an endotracheal tube + stylet both with the Macintosh DL (31.9 ± 20.8 vs. 37.8 ± 22.2 N, P < 0.001) and C-MAC VL (35.2 ± 17.5 vs. 38.4 ± 17.5 N, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with the use of an endotracheal tube + stylet, the use of a GEB was associated with lower maximum forces on the oral structures during both direct and indirect laryngoscopy performed by novices. Our results suggest the expanded role of a GEB beyond an airway adjunct for difficult airways.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7201614
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72016142020-05-08 Lower maximum forces on oral structures when using gum-elastic bougie than when using endotracheal tube and stylet during both direct and indirect laryngoscopy by novices: a crossover study using a high-fidelity simulator Ono, Yuko Shinohara, Kazuaki Shimada, Jiro Inoue, Shigeaki Kotani, Joji BMC Emerg Med Research Article BACKGROUND: Applying excessive force during endotracheal intubation (ETI) is associated with several complications, including dental trauma and hemodynamic alterations. A gum-elastic bougie (GEB), a type of tracheal tube introducer, is a useful airway adjunct for patients with poor laryngoscopic views. However, how the use of a GEB affects the force applied during laryngoscopy is unclear. We compared the force applied on the oral structures during ETI performed by novices using the GEB versus an endotracheal tube + stylet. METHODS: This prospective crossover study was conducted from April 2017 to March 2019 in a public medical university in Japan. In total, 209 medical students (4th and 5th grade, mean age of 23.7 ± 2.0 years) without clinical ETI experience were recruited. The participants used either a Macintosh direct laryngoscope (DL) or C-MAC video laryngoscope (VL) in combination with a GEB or stylet to perform ETI on a high-fidelity airway management simulator. The order of the first ETI method was randomized to minimize the learning curve effect. The outcomes of interest were the maximum forces applied on the maxillary incisors and tongue during laryngoscopy. The implanted sensors in the simulator quantified these forces automatically. RESULTS: The maximum force applied on the maxillary incisors was significantly lower when using a GEB than when using an endotracheal tube + stylet both with the Macintosh DL (39.0 ± 23.3 vs. 47.4 ± 32.6 N, P < 0.001) and C-MAC VL (38.9 ± 18.6 vs. 42.0 ± 22.1 N, P < 0.001). Similarly, the force applied on the tongue was significantly lower when using a GEB than when using an endotracheal tube + stylet both with the Macintosh DL (31.9 ± 20.8 vs. 37.8 ± 22.2 N, P < 0.001) and C-MAC VL (35.2 ± 17.5 vs. 38.4 ± 17.5 N, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with the use of an endotracheal tube + stylet, the use of a GEB was associated with lower maximum forces on the oral structures during both direct and indirect laryngoscopy performed by novices. Our results suggest the expanded role of a GEB beyond an airway adjunct for difficult airways. BioMed Central 2020-05-06 /pmc/articles/PMC7201614/ /pubmed/32375651 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12873-020-00328-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Ono, Yuko
Shinohara, Kazuaki
Shimada, Jiro
Inoue, Shigeaki
Kotani, Joji
Lower maximum forces on oral structures when using gum-elastic bougie than when using endotracheal tube and stylet during both direct and indirect laryngoscopy by novices: a crossover study using a high-fidelity simulator
title Lower maximum forces on oral structures when using gum-elastic bougie than when using endotracheal tube and stylet during both direct and indirect laryngoscopy by novices: a crossover study using a high-fidelity simulator
title_full Lower maximum forces on oral structures when using gum-elastic bougie than when using endotracheal tube and stylet during both direct and indirect laryngoscopy by novices: a crossover study using a high-fidelity simulator
title_fullStr Lower maximum forces on oral structures when using gum-elastic bougie than when using endotracheal tube and stylet during both direct and indirect laryngoscopy by novices: a crossover study using a high-fidelity simulator
title_full_unstemmed Lower maximum forces on oral structures when using gum-elastic bougie than when using endotracheal tube and stylet during both direct and indirect laryngoscopy by novices: a crossover study using a high-fidelity simulator
title_short Lower maximum forces on oral structures when using gum-elastic bougie than when using endotracheal tube and stylet during both direct and indirect laryngoscopy by novices: a crossover study using a high-fidelity simulator
title_sort lower maximum forces on oral structures when using gum-elastic bougie than when using endotracheal tube and stylet during both direct and indirect laryngoscopy by novices: a crossover study using a high-fidelity simulator
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7201614/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32375651
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12873-020-00328-9
work_keys_str_mv AT onoyuko lowermaximumforcesonoralstructureswhenusinggumelasticbougiethanwhenusingendotrachealtubeandstyletduringbothdirectandindirectlaryngoscopybynovicesacrossoverstudyusingahighfidelitysimulator
AT shinoharakazuaki lowermaximumforcesonoralstructureswhenusinggumelasticbougiethanwhenusingendotrachealtubeandstyletduringbothdirectandindirectlaryngoscopybynovicesacrossoverstudyusingahighfidelitysimulator
AT shimadajiro lowermaximumforcesonoralstructureswhenusinggumelasticbougiethanwhenusingendotrachealtubeandstyletduringbothdirectandindirectlaryngoscopybynovicesacrossoverstudyusingahighfidelitysimulator
AT inoueshigeaki lowermaximumforcesonoralstructureswhenusinggumelasticbougiethanwhenusingendotrachealtubeandstyletduringbothdirectandindirectlaryngoscopybynovicesacrossoverstudyusingahighfidelitysimulator
AT kotanijoji lowermaximumforcesonoralstructureswhenusinggumelasticbougiethanwhenusingendotrachealtubeandstyletduringbothdirectandindirectlaryngoscopybynovicesacrossoverstudyusingahighfidelitysimulator