Cargando…

Evaluating capacity at three government referral hospital emergency units in the kingdom of Eswatini using the WHO Hospital Emergency Unit Assessment Tool

BACKGROUND: The Kingdom of Eswatini, a lower-middle income nation of 1.45 million in southern Africa, has recently identified emergency care as a key strategy to respond to the national disease burden. We aimed to evaluate the current capacity of hospital emergency care areas using the WHO Hospital...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pigoga, J. L., Joiner, A. P., Chowa, P., Luong, J., Mhlanga, M., Reynolds, T. A., Wallis, L. A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7201969/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32375637
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12873-020-00327-w
_version_ 1783529645460684800
author Pigoga, J. L.
Joiner, A. P.
Chowa, P.
Luong, J.
Mhlanga, M.
Reynolds, T. A.
Wallis, L. A.
author_facet Pigoga, J. L.
Joiner, A. P.
Chowa, P.
Luong, J.
Mhlanga, M.
Reynolds, T. A.
Wallis, L. A.
author_sort Pigoga, J. L.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The Kingdom of Eswatini, a lower-middle income nation of 1.45 million in southern Africa, has recently identified emergency care as a key strategy to respond to the national disease burden. We aimed to evaluate the current capacity of hospital emergency care areas using the WHO Hospital Emergency Unit Assessment Tool (HEAT) at government referral hospitals in Eswatini. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study of three government referral hospital emergency care areas using HEAT in May 2018. This standardised tool assists healthcare facilities to assess the emergency care delivery capacity in facilities and support in identifying gaps and targeting interventions to strengthen care delivery within emergency care areas. Senior-level emergency care area employees, including senior medical officers and nurse matrons, were interviewed using the HEAT. RESULTS: All sites provided some level of emergency care 24 h a day, 7 days a week, though most had multiple entry points for emergency care. Only one facility had a dedicated area for receiving emergencies and a dedicated resuscitation area; two had triage areas. Facilities had limited capacity to perform signal functions (life-saving procedures that require both skills and resources). Commonly reported barriers included training deficits and lack of access to supplies, medications, and equipment. Sites also lacked formal clinical management and process protocols (such as triage and clinical protocols). CONCLUSIONS: The HEAT highlighted strengths and weaknesses of emergency care delivery within hospitals in Eswatini and identified specific causes of these system and service gaps. In order to improve emergency care outcomes, multiple interventions are needed, including training opportunities, improvement in supply chains, and implementation of clinical and process protocols for emergency care areas. We hope that these findings will allow hospital administrators and planners to develop effective change management plans.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7201969
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72019692020-05-09 Evaluating capacity at three government referral hospital emergency units in the kingdom of Eswatini using the WHO Hospital Emergency Unit Assessment Tool Pigoga, J. L. Joiner, A. P. Chowa, P. Luong, J. Mhlanga, M. Reynolds, T. A. Wallis, L. A. BMC Emerg Med Research Article BACKGROUND: The Kingdom of Eswatini, a lower-middle income nation of 1.45 million in southern Africa, has recently identified emergency care as a key strategy to respond to the national disease burden. We aimed to evaluate the current capacity of hospital emergency care areas using the WHO Hospital Emergency Unit Assessment Tool (HEAT) at government referral hospitals in Eswatini. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study of three government referral hospital emergency care areas using HEAT in May 2018. This standardised tool assists healthcare facilities to assess the emergency care delivery capacity in facilities and support in identifying gaps and targeting interventions to strengthen care delivery within emergency care areas. Senior-level emergency care area employees, including senior medical officers and nurse matrons, were interviewed using the HEAT. RESULTS: All sites provided some level of emergency care 24 h a day, 7 days a week, though most had multiple entry points for emergency care. Only one facility had a dedicated area for receiving emergencies and a dedicated resuscitation area; two had triage areas. Facilities had limited capacity to perform signal functions (life-saving procedures that require both skills and resources). Commonly reported barriers included training deficits and lack of access to supplies, medications, and equipment. Sites also lacked formal clinical management and process protocols (such as triage and clinical protocols). CONCLUSIONS: The HEAT highlighted strengths and weaknesses of emergency care delivery within hospitals in Eswatini and identified specific causes of these system and service gaps. In order to improve emergency care outcomes, multiple interventions are needed, including training opportunities, improvement in supply chains, and implementation of clinical and process protocols for emergency care areas. We hope that these findings will allow hospital administrators and planners to develop effective change management plans. BioMed Central 2020-05-06 /pmc/articles/PMC7201969/ /pubmed/32375637 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12873-020-00327-w Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Pigoga, J. L.
Joiner, A. P.
Chowa, P.
Luong, J.
Mhlanga, M.
Reynolds, T. A.
Wallis, L. A.
Evaluating capacity at three government referral hospital emergency units in the kingdom of Eswatini using the WHO Hospital Emergency Unit Assessment Tool
title Evaluating capacity at three government referral hospital emergency units in the kingdom of Eswatini using the WHO Hospital Emergency Unit Assessment Tool
title_full Evaluating capacity at three government referral hospital emergency units in the kingdom of Eswatini using the WHO Hospital Emergency Unit Assessment Tool
title_fullStr Evaluating capacity at three government referral hospital emergency units in the kingdom of Eswatini using the WHO Hospital Emergency Unit Assessment Tool
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating capacity at three government referral hospital emergency units in the kingdom of Eswatini using the WHO Hospital Emergency Unit Assessment Tool
title_short Evaluating capacity at three government referral hospital emergency units in the kingdom of Eswatini using the WHO Hospital Emergency Unit Assessment Tool
title_sort evaluating capacity at three government referral hospital emergency units in the kingdom of eswatini using the who hospital emergency unit assessment tool
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7201969/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32375637
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12873-020-00327-w
work_keys_str_mv AT pigogajl evaluatingcapacityatthreegovernmentreferralhospitalemergencyunitsinthekingdomofeswatiniusingthewhohospitalemergencyunitassessmenttool
AT joinerap evaluatingcapacityatthreegovernmentreferralhospitalemergencyunitsinthekingdomofeswatiniusingthewhohospitalemergencyunitassessmenttool
AT chowap evaluatingcapacityatthreegovernmentreferralhospitalemergencyunitsinthekingdomofeswatiniusingthewhohospitalemergencyunitassessmenttool
AT luongj evaluatingcapacityatthreegovernmentreferralhospitalemergencyunitsinthekingdomofeswatiniusingthewhohospitalemergencyunitassessmenttool
AT mhlangam evaluatingcapacityatthreegovernmentreferralhospitalemergencyunitsinthekingdomofeswatiniusingthewhohospitalemergencyunitassessmenttool
AT reynoldsta evaluatingcapacityatthreegovernmentreferralhospitalemergencyunitsinthekingdomofeswatiniusingthewhohospitalemergencyunitassessmenttool
AT wallisla evaluatingcapacityatthreegovernmentreferralhospitalemergencyunitsinthekingdomofeswatiniusingthewhohospitalemergencyunitassessmenttool