Cargando…

Comparative Cytology of Female Meiosis I Among Drosophila Species

The physical connections established by recombination are normally sufficient to ensure proper chromosome segregation during female Meiosis I. However, nonexchange chromosomes (such as the Muller F element or “dot” chromosome in D. melanogaster) can still segregate accurately because they remain con...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Majekodunmi, Ahmed, Bowen, Amelia O., Gilliland, William D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Genetics Society of America 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7202005/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32217631
http://dx.doi.org/10.1534/g3.120.400867
_version_ 1783529653335490560
author Majekodunmi, Ahmed
Bowen, Amelia O.
Gilliland, William D.
author_facet Majekodunmi, Ahmed
Bowen, Amelia O.
Gilliland, William D.
author_sort Majekodunmi, Ahmed
collection PubMed
description The physical connections established by recombination are normally sufficient to ensure proper chromosome segregation during female Meiosis I. However, nonexchange chromosomes (such as the Muller F element or “dot” chromosome in D. melanogaster) can still segregate accurately because they remain connected by heterochromatic tethers. A recent study examined female meiosis in the closely related species D. melanogaster and D. simulans, and found a nearly twofold difference in the mean distance the obligately nonexchange dot chromosomes were separated during Prometaphase. That study proposed two speculative hypotheses for this difference, the first being the amount of heterochromatin in each species, and the second being the species’ differing tolerance for common inversions in natural populations. We tested these hypotheses by examining female meiosis in 12 additional Drosophila species. While neither hypothesis had significant support, we did see 10-fold variation in dot chromosome sizes, and fivefold variation in the frequency of chromosomes out on the spindle, which were both significantly correlated with chromosome separation distances. In addition to demonstrating that heterochromatin abundance changes chromosome behavior, this implies that the duration of Prometaphase chromosome movements must be proportional to the size of the F element in these species. Additionally, we examined D. willistoni, a species that lacks a free dot chromosome. We observed that chromosomes still moved out on the meiotic spindle, and the F element was always positioned closest to the spindle poles. This result is consistent with models where one role of the dot chromosomes is to help organize the meiotic spindle.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7202005
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Genetics Society of America
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72020052020-05-09 Comparative Cytology of Female Meiosis I Among Drosophila Species Majekodunmi, Ahmed Bowen, Amelia O. Gilliland, William D. G3 (Bethesda) Investigations The physical connections established by recombination are normally sufficient to ensure proper chromosome segregation during female Meiosis I. However, nonexchange chromosomes (such as the Muller F element or “dot” chromosome in D. melanogaster) can still segregate accurately because they remain connected by heterochromatic tethers. A recent study examined female meiosis in the closely related species D. melanogaster and D. simulans, and found a nearly twofold difference in the mean distance the obligately nonexchange dot chromosomes were separated during Prometaphase. That study proposed two speculative hypotheses for this difference, the first being the amount of heterochromatin in each species, and the second being the species’ differing tolerance for common inversions in natural populations. We tested these hypotheses by examining female meiosis in 12 additional Drosophila species. While neither hypothesis had significant support, we did see 10-fold variation in dot chromosome sizes, and fivefold variation in the frequency of chromosomes out on the spindle, which were both significantly correlated with chromosome separation distances. In addition to demonstrating that heterochromatin abundance changes chromosome behavior, this implies that the duration of Prometaphase chromosome movements must be proportional to the size of the F element in these species. Additionally, we examined D. willistoni, a species that lacks a free dot chromosome. We observed that chromosomes still moved out on the meiotic spindle, and the F element was always positioned closest to the spindle poles. This result is consistent with models where one role of the dot chromosomes is to help organize the meiotic spindle. Genetics Society of America 2020-03-26 /pmc/articles/PMC7202005/ /pubmed/32217631 http://dx.doi.org/10.1534/g3.120.400867 Text en Copyright © 2020 Majekodunmi et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Investigations
Majekodunmi, Ahmed
Bowen, Amelia O.
Gilliland, William D.
Comparative Cytology of Female Meiosis I Among Drosophila Species
title Comparative Cytology of Female Meiosis I Among Drosophila Species
title_full Comparative Cytology of Female Meiosis I Among Drosophila Species
title_fullStr Comparative Cytology of Female Meiosis I Among Drosophila Species
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Cytology of Female Meiosis I Among Drosophila Species
title_short Comparative Cytology of Female Meiosis I Among Drosophila Species
title_sort comparative cytology of female meiosis i among drosophila species
topic Investigations
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7202005/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32217631
http://dx.doi.org/10.1534/g3.120.400867
work_keys_str_mv AT majekodunmiahmed comparativecytologyoffemalemeiosisiamongdrosophilaspecies
AT bowenameliao comparativecytologyoffemalemeiosisiamongdrosophilaspecies
AT gillilandwilliamd comparativecytologyoffemalemeiosisiamongdrosophilaspecies