Cargando…

Sexual Selection Does Not Increase the Rate of Compensatory Adaptation to a Mutation Influencing a Secondary Sexual Trait in Drosophila melanogaster

Theoretical work predicts that sexual selection can enhance natural selection, increasing the rate of adaptation to new environments and helping purge harmful mutations. While some experiments support these predictions, remarkably little work has addressed the role of sexual selection on compensator...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chandler, Christopher H., Mammel, Anna, Dworkin, Ian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Genetics Society of America 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7202011/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32122961
http://dx.doi.org/10.1534/g3.119.400934
_version_ 1783529654791962624
author Chandler, Christopher H.
Mammel, Anna
Dworkin, Ian
author_facet Chandler, Christopher H.
Mammel, Anna
Dworkin, Ian
author_sort Chandler, Christopher H.
collection PubMed
description Theoretical work predicts that sexual selection can enhance natural selection, increasing the rate of adaptation to new environments and helping purge harmful mutations. While some experiments support these predictions, remarkably little work has addressed the role of sexual selection on compensatory adaptation—populations’ ability to compensate for the costs of deleterious alleles that are already present. We tested whether sexual selection, as well as the degree of standing genetic variation, affect the rate of compensatory evolution via phenotypic suppression in experimental populations of Drosophila melanogaster. These populations were fixed for a spontaneous mutation causing mild abnormalities in the male sex comb, a structure important for mating success. We fine-mapped this mutation to an ∼85 kb region on the X chromosome containing three candidate genes, showed that the mutation is deleterious, and that its phenotypic expression and penetrance vary by genetic background. We then performed experimental evolution, including a treatment where opportunity for mate choice was limited by experimentally enforced monogamy. Although evolved populations did show some phenotypic suppression of the morphological abnormalities in the sex comb, the amount of suppression did not depend on the opportunity for sexual selection. Sexual selection, therefore, may not always enhance natural selection; instead, the interaction between these two forces may depend on additional factors.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7202011
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Genetics Society of America
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72020112020-05-09 Sexual Selection Does Not Increase the Rate of Compensatory Adaptation to a Mutation Influencing a Secondary Sexual Trait in Drosophila melanogaster Chandler, Christopher H. Mammel, Anna Dworkin, Ian G3 (Bethesda) Investigations Theoretical work predicts that sexual selection can enhance natural selection, increasing the rate of adaptation to new environments and helping purge harmful mutations. While some experiments support these predictions, remarkably little work has addressed the role of sexual selection on compensatory adaptation—populations’ ability to compensate for the costs of deleterious alleles that are already present. We tested whether sexual selection, as well as the degree of standing genetic variation, affect the rate of compensatory evolution via phenotypic suppression in experimental populations of Drosophila melanogaster. These populations were fixed for a spontaneous mutation causing mild abnormalities in the male sex comb, a structure important for mating success. We fine-mapped this mutation to an ∼85 kb region on the X chromosome containing three candidate genes, showed that the mutation is deleterious, and that its phenotypic expression and penetrance vary by genetic background. We then performed experimental evolution, including a treatment where opportunity for mate choice was limited by experimentally enforced monogamy. Although evolved populations did show some phenotypic suppression of the morphological abnormalities in the sex comb, the amount of suppression did not depend on the opportunity for sexual selection. Sexual selection, therefore, may not always enhance natural selection; instead, the interaction between these two forces may depend on additional factors. Genetics Society of America 2020-03-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7202011/ /pubmed/32122961 http://dx.doi.org/10.1534/g3.119.400934 Text en Copyright © 2020 Chandler et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Investigations
Chandler, Christopher H.
Mammel, Anna
Dworkin, Ian
Sexual Selection Does Not Increase the Rate of Compensatory Adaptation to a Mutation Influencing a Secondary Sexual Trait in Drosophila melanogaster
title Sexual Selection Does Not Increase the Rate of Compensatory Adaptation to a Mutation Influencing a Secondary Sexual Trait in Drosophila melanogaster
title_full Sexual Selection Does Not Increase the Rate of Compensatory Adaptation to a Mutation Influencing a Secondary Sexual Trait in Drosophila melanogaster
title_fullStr Sexual Selection Does Not Increase the Rate of Compensatory Adaptation to a Mutation Influencing a Secondary Sexual Trait in Drosophila melanogaster
title_full_unstemmed Sexual Selection Does Not Increase the Rate of Compensatory Adaptation to a Mutation Influencing a Secondary Sexual Trait in Drosophila melanogaster
title_short Sexual Selection Does Not Increase the Rate of Compensatory Adaptation to a Mutation Influencing a Secondary Sexual Trait in Drosophila melanogaster
title_sort sexual selection does not increase the rate of compensatory adaptation to a mutation influencing a secondary sexual trait in drosophila melanogaster
topic Investigations
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7202011/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32122961
http://dx.doi.org/10.1534/g3.119.400934
work_keys_str_mv AT chandlerchristopherh sexualselectiondoesnotincreasetherateofcompensatoryadaptationtoamutationinfluencingasecondarysexualtraitindrosophilamelanogaster
AT mammelanna sexualselectiondoesnotincreasetherateofcompensatoryadaptationtoamutationinfluencingasecondarysexualtraitindrosophilamelanogaster
AT dworkinian sexualselectiondoesnotincreasetherateofcompensatoryadaptationtoamutationinfluencingasecondarysexualtraitindrosophilamelanogaster