Cargando…

Development and validation of an early pregnancy risk score for the prediction of gestational diabetes mellitus in Chinese pregnant women

OBJECTIVE: To develop and validate a set of risk scores for the prediction of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) before the 15th gestational week using an established population-based prospective cohort. METHODS: From October 2010 to August 2012, 19 331 eligible pregnant women were registered in th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gao, Si, Leng, Junhong, Liu, Hongyan, Wang, Shuo, Li, Weiqin, Wang, Yue, Hu, Gang, Chan, Juliana C N, Yu, Zhijie, Zhu, Hong, Yang, Xilin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7202751/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32327440
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjdrc-2019-000909
_version_ 1783529759357009920
author Gao, Si
Leng, Junhong
Liu, Hongyan
Wang, Shuo
Li, Weiqin
Wang, Yue
Hu, Gang
Chan, Juliana C N
Yu, Zhijie
Zhu, Hong
Yang, Xilin
author_facet Gao, Si
Leng, Junhong
Liu, Hongyan
Wang, Shuo
Li, Weiqin
Wang, Yue
Hu, Gang
Chan, Juliana C N
Yu, Zhijie
Zhu, Hong
Yang, Xilin
author_sort Gao, Si
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To develop and validate a set of risk scores for the prediction of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) before the 15th gestational week using an established population-based prospective cohort. METHODS: From October 2010 to August 2012, 19 331 eligible pregnant women were registered in the three-tiered antenatal care network in Tianjin, China, to receive their antenatal care and a two-step GDM screening. The whole dataset was randomly divided into a training dataset (for development of the risk score) and a test dataset (for validation of performance of the risk score). Logistic regression was performed to obtain coefficients of selected predictors for GDM in the training dataset. Calibration was estimated using Hosmer-Lemeshow test, while discrimination was checked using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) in the test dataset. RESULTS: In the training dataset (total=12 887, GDM=979 or 7.6%), two risk scores were developed, one only including predictors collected at the first antenatal care visit for early prediction of GDM, like maternal age, body mass index, height, family history of diabetes, systolic blood pressure, and alanine aminotransferase; and the other also including predictors collected during pregnancy, that is, at the time of GDM screening, like physical activity, sitting time at home, passive smoking, and weight gain, for maximum performance. In the test dataset (total=6444, GDM=506 or 7.9%), the calibrations of both risk scores were acceptable (both p for Hosmer-Lemeshow test >0.25). The AUCs of the first and second risk scores were 0.710 (95% CI: 0.680 to 0.741) and 0.712 (95% CI: 0.682 to 0.743), respectively (p for difference: 0.9273). CONCLUSION: Both developed risk scores had adequate performance for the prediction of GDM in Chinese pregnant women in Tianjin, China. Further validations are needed to evaluate their performance in other populations and using different methods to identify GDM cases.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7202751
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72027512020-05-13 Development and validation of an early pregnancy risk score for the prediction of gestational diabetes mellitus in Chinese pregnant women Gao, Si Leng, Junhong Liu, Hongyan Wang, Shuo Li, Weiqin Wang, Yue Hu, Gang Chan, Juliana C N Yu, Zhijie Zhu, Hong Yang, Xilin BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care Epidemiology/Health Services Research OBJECTIVE: To develop and validate a set of risk scores for the prediction of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) before the 15th gestational week using an established population-based prospective cohort. METHODS: From October 2010 to August 2012, 19 331 eligible pregnant women were registered in the three-tiered antenatal care network in Tianjin, China, to receive their antenatal care and a two-step GDM screening. The whole dataset was randomly divided into a training dataset (for development of the risk score) and a test dataset (for validation of performance of the risk score). Logistic regression was performed to obtain coefficients of selected predictors for GDM in the training dataset. Calibration was estimated using Hosmer-Lemeshow test, while discrimination was checked using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) in the test dataset. RESULTS: In the training dataset (total=12 887, GDM=979 or 7.6%), two risk scores were developed, one only including predictors collected at the first antenatal care visit for early prediction of GDM, like maternal age, body mass index, height, family history of diabetes, systolic blood pressure, and alanine aminotransferase; and the other also including predictors collected during pregnancy, that is, at the time of GDM screening, like physical activity, sitting time at home, passive smoking, and weight gain, for maximum performance. In the test dataset (total=6444, GDM=506 or 7.9%), the calibrations of both risk scores were acceptable (both p for Hosmer-Lemeshow test >0.25). The AUCs of the first and second risk scores were 0.710 (95% CI: 0.680 to 0.741) and 0.712 (95% CI: 0.682 to 0.743), respectively (p for difference: 0.9273). CONCLUSION: Both developed risk scores had adequate performance for the prediction of GDM in Chinese pregnant women in Tianjin, China. Further validations are needed to evaluate their performance in other populations and using different methods to identify GDM cases. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-04-22 /pmc/articles/PMC7202751/ /pubmed/32327440 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjdrc-2019-000909 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Epidemiology/Health Services Research
Gao, Si
Leng, Junhong
Liu, Hongyan
Wang, Shuo
Li, Weiqin
Wang, Yue
Hu, Gang
Chan, Juliana C N
Yu, Zhijie
Zhu, Hong
Yang, Xilin
Development and validation of an early pregnancy risk score for the prediction of gestational diabetes mellitus in Chinese pregnant women
title Development and validation of an early pregnancy risk score for the prediction of gestational diabetes mellitus in Chinese pregnant women
title_full Development and validation of an early pregnancy risk score for the prediction of gestational diabetes mellitus in Chinese pregnant women
title_fullStr Development and validation of an early pregnancy risk score for the prediction of gestational diabetes mellitus in Chinese pregnant women
title_full_unstemmed Development and validation of an early pregnancy risk score for the prediction of gestational diabetes mellitus in Chinese pregnant women
title_short Development and validation of an early pregnancy risk score for the prediction of gestational diabetes mellitus in Chinese pregnant women
title_sort development and validation of an early pregnancy risk score for the prediction of gestational diabetes mellitus in chinese pregnant women
topic Epidemiology/Health Services Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7202751/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32327440
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjdrc-2019-000909
work_keys_str_mv AT gaosi developmentandvalidationofanearlypregnancyriskscoreforthepredictionofgestationaldiabetesmellitusinchinesepregnantwomen
AT lengjunhong developmentandvalidationofanearlypregnancyriskscoreforthepredictionofgestationaldiabetesmellitusinchinesepregnantwomen
AT liuhongyan developmentandvalidationofanearlypregnancyriskscoreforthepredictionofgestationaldiabetesmellitusinchinesepregnantwomen
AT wangshuo developmentandvalidationofanearlypregnancyriskscoreforthepredictionofgestationaldiabetesmellitusinchinesepregnantwomen
AT liweiqin developmentandvalidationofanearlypregnancyriskscoreforthepredictionofgestationaldiabetesmellitusinchinesepregnantwomen
AT wangyue developmentandvalidationofanearlypregnancyriskscoreforthepredictionofgestationaldiabetesmellitusinchinesepregnantwomen
AT hugang developmentandvalidationofanearlypregnancyriskscoreforthepredictionofgestationaldiabetesmellitusinchinesepregnantwomen
AT chanjulianacn developmentandvalidationofanearlypregnancyriskscoreforthepredictionofgestationaldiabetesmellitusinchinesepregnantwomen
AT yuzhijie developmentandvalidationofanearlypregnancyriskscoreforthepredictionofgestationaldiabetesmellitusinchinesepregnantwomen
AT zhuhong developmentandvalidationofanearlypregnancyriskscoreforthepredictionofgestationaldiabetesmellitusinchinesepregnantwomen
AT yangxilin developmentandvalidationofanearlypregnancyriskscoreforthepredictionofgestationaldiabetesmellitusinchinesepregnantwomen