Asymmetry, Abstraction, and Autonomy: Justifying Coarse-Graining in Statistical Mechanics

1.. : 1.1.. Prospectus; 2.. The Zwanzig–Zeh–Wallace Framework; 3.. 3.1.. The special conditions account; 3.2.. When is a density forwards-compatible? 4.. : 4.1.. The two objections in more detail; 4.2.. Against the justification by measurement imprecision; 5.. : 5.1.. Abstraction and autonomy; 5.2.....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Robertson, Katie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2020
Materias:
Articles
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7202781/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32394985
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bjps/axy020
_version_ 1783529760771538944
author Robertson, Katie
author_facet Robertson, Katie
author_sort Robertson, Katie
collection PubMed
description 1.. : 1.1.. Prospectus; 2.. The Zwanzig–Zeh–Wallace Framework; 3.. 3.1.. The special conditions account; 3.2.. When is a density forwards-compatible? 4.. : 4.1.. The two objections in more detail; 4.2.. Against the justification by measurement imprecision; 5.. : 5.1.. Abstraction and autonomy; 5.2.. An illustration: the Game of Life; 6.. Reply to Illusory; 7.. Reply to Anthropocentric; 8.. : 8.1.. Inter-theoretic relations; 8.2.. The nature of irreversibility.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7202781
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72027812020-05-11 Asymmetry, Abstraction, and Autonomy: Justifying Coarse-Graining in Statistical Mechanics Robertson, Katie Br J Philos Sci Articles 1.. : 1.1.. Prospectus; 2.. The Zwanzig–Zeh–Wallace Framework; 3.. 3.1.. The special conditions account; 3.2.. When is a density forwards-compatible? 4.. : 4.1.. The two objections in more detail; 4.2.. Against the justification by measurement imprecision; 5.. : 5.1.. Abstraction and autonomy; 5.2.. An illustration: the Game of Life; 6.. Reply to Illusory; 7.. Reply to Anthropocentric; 8.. : 8.1.. Inter-theoretic relations; 8.2.. The nature of irreversibility. Oxford University Press 2020-06 2018-06-26 /pmc/articles/PMC7202781/ /pubmed/32394985 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bjps/axy020 Text en © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of British Society for the Philosophy of Science. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Articles
Robertson, Katie
Asymmetry, Abstraction, and Autonomy: Justifying Coarse-Graining in Statistical Mechanics
title Asymmetry, Abstraction, and Autonomy: Justifying Coarse-Graining in Statistical Mechanics
title_full Asymmetry, Abstraction, and Autonomy: Justifying Coarse-Graining in Statistical Mechanics
title_fullStr Asymmetry, Abstraction, and Autonomy: Justifying Coarse-Graining in Statistical Mechanics
title_full_unstemmed Asymmetry, Abstraction, and Autonomy: Justifying Coarse-Graining in Statistical Mechanics
title_short Asymmetry, Abstraction, and Autonomy: Justifying Coarse-Graining in Statistical Mechanics
title_sort asymmetry, abstraction, and autonomy: justifying coarse-graining in statistical mechanics
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7202781/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32394985
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bjps/axy020
work_keys_str_mv AT robertsonkatie asymmetryabstractionandautonomyjustifyingcoarsegraininginstatisticalmechanics

Ejemplares similares