Cargando…

Comparison of novel tools with traditional cognitive tests in detecting delirium in elderly medical patients

BACKGROUND: Efficient detection of delirium and comorbid delirium-dementia is a key diagnostic challenge. Development of new, efficient delirium-focused methods of cognitive assessment is a key challenge for improved detection of neurocognitive disorders in everyday clinical practice. AIM: To compar...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Meagher, David J, O’Connell, Henry, Leonard, Maeve, Williams, Olugbenga, Awan, Fahad, Exton, Chris, Tenorio, Michael, O’Connor, Margaret, Dunne, Colum P, Cullen, Walter, McFarland, John, Adamis, Dimitrios
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7203081/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32399398
http://dx.doi.org/10.5498/wjp.v10.i4.46
_version_ 1783529806859599872
author Meagher, David J
O’Connell, Henry
Leonard, Maeve
Williams, Olugbenga
Awan, Fahad
Exton, Chris
Tenorio, Michael
O’Connor, Margaret
Dunne, Colum P
Cullen, Walter
McFarland, John
Adamis, Dimitrios
author_facet Meagher, David J
O’Connell, Henry
Leonard, Maeve
Williams, Olugbenga
Awan, Fahad
Exton, Chris
Tenorio, Michael
O’Connor, Margaret
Dunne, Colum P
Cullen, Walter
McFarland, John
Adamis, Dimitrios
author_sort Meagher, David J
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Efficient detection of delirium and comorbid delirium-dementia is a key diagnostic challenge. Development of new, efficient delirium-focused methods of cognitive assessment is a key challenge for improved detection of neurocognitive disorders in everyday clinical practice. AIM: To compare the accuracy of two novel bedside tests of attention, vigilance and visuospatial function with conventional bedside cognitive tests in identifying delirium in older hospitalized patients. METHODS: 180 consecutive elderly medical inpatients (mean age 79.6 ± 7.2; 51% female) referred to a psychiatry for later life consultation-liaison service with delirium, dementia, comorbid delirium–dementia and cognitively intact controls. Participants were assessed cross-sectionally with conventional bedside cognitive tests [WORLD, Months Backward test (MBT), Spatial span, Vigilance A and B, Clock Drawing test and Interlocking Pentagons test] and two novel cognitive tests [Lighthouse test, Letter and Shape Drawing test (LSD)-4]. RESULTS: Neurocognitive diagnoses were delirium (n = 44), dementia (n = 30), comorbid delirium-dementia (n = 60) and no neurocognitive disorder (n = 46). All conventional tests had sensitivity of > 70% for delirium, with best overall accuracy for the Vigilance-B (78.3%), Vigilance-A (77.8%) and MBT (76.7%) tests. The sustained attention component of the Lighthouse test was the most distinguishing of delirium (sensitivity 84.6%; overall accuracy 75.6%). The LSD-4 had sensitivity of 74.0% and overall accuracy 74.4% for delirium identification. Combining tests allowed for enhanced sensitivity (> 90%) and overall accuracy (≥ 75%) with the highest overall accuracy for the combination of MBT-Vigilance A and the combined Vigilance A and B tests (both 78.3%). When analyses were repeated for those with dementia, there were similar findings with the MBT-Vigilance A the most accurate overall combination (80.0%). Combining the Lighthouse-SA with the LSD-4, a fail in either test had sensitivity for delirium of 91.4 with overall accuracy of 74.4%. CONCLUSION: Bedside tests of attention, vigilance and visuospatial ability can help to distinguish neurocognitive disorders, including delirium, from other presentations. The Lighthouse test and the LSD-4 are novel tests with high accuracy for detecting delirium.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7203081
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Baishideng Publishing Group Inc
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72030812020-05-12 Comparison of novel tools with traditional cognitive tests in detecting delirium in elderly medical patients Meagher, David J O’Connell, Henry Leonard, Maeve Williams, Olugbenga Awan, Fahad Exton, Chris Tenorio, Michael O’Connor, Margaret Dunne, Colum P Cullen, Walter McFarland, John Adamis, Dimitrios World J Psychiatry Basic Study BACKGROUND: Efficient detection of delirium and comorbid delirium-dementia is a key diagnostic challenge. Development of new, efficient delirium-focused methods of cognitive assessment is a key challenge for improved detection of neurocognitive disorders in everyday clinical practice. AIM: To compare the accuracy of two novel bedside tests of attention, vigilance and visuospatial function with conventional bedside cognitive tests in identifying delirium in older hospitalized patients. METHODS: 180 consecutive elderly medical inpatients (mean age 79.6 ± 7.2; 51% female) referred to a psychiatry for later life consultation-liaison service with delirium, dementia, comorbid delirium–dementia and cognitively intact controls. Participants were assessed cross-sectionally with conventional bedside cognitive tests [WORLD, Months Backward test (MBT), Spatial span, Vigilance A and B, Clock Drawing test and Interlocking Pentagons test] and two novel cognitive tests [Lighthouse test, Letter and Shape Drawing test (LSD)-4]. RESULTS: Neurocognitive diagnoses were delirium (n = 44), dementia (n = 30), comorbid delirium-dementia (n = 60) and no neurocognitive disorder (n = 46). All conventional tests had sensitivity of > 70% for delirium, with best overall accuracy for the Vigilance-B (78.3%), Vigilance-A (77.8%) and MBT (76.7%) tests. The sustained attention component of the Lighthouse test was the most distinguishing of delirium (sensitivity 84.6%; overall accuracy 75.6%). The LSD-4 had sensitivity of 74.0% and overall accuracy 74.4% for delirium identification. Combining tests allowed for enhanced sensitivity (> 90%) and overall accuracy (≥ 75%) with the highest overall accuracy for the combination of MBT-Vigilance A and the combined Vigilance A and B tests (both 78.3%). When analyses were repeated for those with dementia, there were similar findings with the MBT-Vigilance A the most accurate overall combination (80.0%). Combining the Lighthouse-SA with the LSD-4, a fail in either test had sensitivity for delirium of 91.4 with overall accuracy of 74.4%. CONCLUSION: Bedside tests of attention, vigilance and visuospatial ability can help to distinguish neurocognitive disorders, including delirium, from other presentations. The Lighthouse test and the LSD-4 are novel tests with high accuracy for detecting delirium. Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2020-04-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7203081/ /pubmed/32399398 http://dx.doi.org/10.5498/wjp.v10.i4.46 Text en ©The Author(s) 2020. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial.
spellingShingle Basic Study
Meagher, David J
O’Connell, Henry
Leonard, Maeve
Williams, Olugbenga
Awan, Fahad
Exton, Chris
Tenorio, Michael
O’Connor, Margaret
Dunne, Colum P
Cullen, Walter
McFarland, John
Adamis, Dimitrios
Comparison of novel tools with traditional cognitive tests in detecting delirium in elderly medical patients
title Comparison of novel tools with traditional cognitive tests in detecting delirium in elderly medical patients
title_full Comparison of novel tools with traditional cognitive tests in detecting delirium in elderly medical patients
title_fullStr Comparison of novel tools with traditional cognitive tests in detecting delirium in elderly medical patients
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of novel tools with traditional cognitive tests in detecting delirium in elderly medical patients
title_short Comparison of novel tools with traditional cognitive tests in detecting delirium in elderly medical patients
title_sort comparison of novel tools with traditional cognitive tests in detecting delirium in elderly medical patients
topic Basic Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7203081/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32399398
http://dx.doi.org/10.5498/wjp.v10.i4.46
work_keys_str_mv AT meagherdavidj comparisonofnoveltoolswithtraditionalcognitivetestsindetectingdeliriuminelderlymedicalpatients
AT oconnellhenry comparisonofnoveltoolswithtraditionalcognitivetestsindetectingdeliriuminelderlymedicalpatients
AT leonardmaeve comparisonofnoveltoolswithtraditionalcognitivetestsindetectingdeliriuminelderlymedicalpatients
AT williamsolugbenga comparisonofnoveltoolswithtraditionalcognitivetestsindetectingdeliriuminelderlymedicalpatients
AT awanfahad comparisonofnoveltoolswithtraditionalcognitivetestsindetectingdeliriuminelderlymedicalpatients
AT extonchris comparisonofnoveltoolswithtraditionalcognitivetestsindetectingdeliriuminelderlymedicalpatients
AT tenoriomichael comparisonofnoveltoolswithtraditionalcognitivetestsindetectingdeliriuminelderlymedicalpatients
AT oconnormargaret comparisonofnoveltoolswithtraditionalcognitivetestsindetectingdeliriuminelderlymedicalpatients
AT dunnecolump comparisonofnoveltoolswithtraditionalcognitivetestsindetectingdeliriuminelderlymedicalpatients
AT cullenwalter comparisonofnoveltoolswithtraditionalcognitivetestsindetectingdeliriuminelderlymedicalpatients
AT mcfarlandjohn comparisonofnoveltoolswithtraditionalcognitivetestsindetectingdeliriuminelderlymedicalpatients
AT adamisdimitrios comparisonofnoveltoolswithtraditionalcognitivetestsindetectingdeliriuminelderlymedicalpatients