Cargando…
Sensor Measures of Affective Leaning
The aim of this study was to predict self-report data for self-regulated learning with sensor data. In a longitudinal study multichannel data were collected: self-report data with questionnaires and embedded experience samples as well as sensor data like electrodermal activity (EDA) and electroencep...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7203482/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32425838 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00379 |
_version_ | 1783529879323541504 |
---|---|
author | Martens, Thomas Niemann, Moritz Dick, Uwe |
author_facet | Martens, Thomas Niemann, Moritz Dick, Uwe |
author_sort | Martens, Thomas |
collection | PubMed |
description | The aim of this study was to predict self-report data for self-regulated learning with sensor data. In a longitudinal study multichannel data were collected: self-report data with questionnaires and embedded experience samples as well as sensor data like electrodermal activity (EDA) and electroencephalography (EEG). 100 students from a private university in Germany performed a learning experiment followed by final measures of intrinsic motivation, self-efficacy and gained knowledge. During the learning experiment psychophysiological data like EEG were combined with embedded experience sampling measuring motivational states like affect and interest every 270 s. Results of machine learning models show that consumer grade wearables for EEG and EDA failed to predict embedded experience sampling. EDA failed to predict outcome measures as well. This gap can be explained by some major technical difficulties, especially by lower quality of the electrodes. Nevertheless, an average activation of all EEG bands at T7 (left-hemispheric, lateral) can predict lower intrinsic motivation as outcome measure. This is in line with the personality system interactions (PSI) theory of Julius Kuhl. With more advanced sensor measures it might be possible to track affective learning in an unobtrusive way and support micro-adaptation in a digital learning environment. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7203482 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72034822020-05-18 Sensor Measures of Affective Leaning Martens, Thomas Niemann, Moritz Dick, Uwe Front Psychol Psychology The aim of this study was to predict self-report data for self-regulated learning with sensor data. In a longitudinal study multichannel data were collected: self-report data with questionnaires and embedded experience samples as well as sensor data like electrodermal activity (EDA) and electroencephalography (EEG). 100 students from a private university in Germany performed a learning experiment followed by final measures of intrinsic motivation, self-efficacy and gained knowledge. During the learning experiment psychophysiological data like EEG were combined with embedded experience sampling measuring motivational states like affect and interest every 270 s. Results of machine learning models show that consumer grade wearables for EEG and EDA failed to predict embedded experience sampling. EDA failed to predict outcome measures as well. This gap can be explained by some major technical difficulties, especially by lower quality of the electrodes. Nevertheless, an average activation of all EEG bands at T7 (left-hemispheric, lateral) can predict lower intrinsic motivation as outcome measure. This is in line with the personality system interactions (PSI) theory of Julius Kuhl. With more advanced sensor measures it might be possible to track affective learning in an unobtrusive way and support micro-adaptation in a digital learning environment. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-04-30 /pmc/articles/PMC7203482/ /pubmed/32425838 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00379 Text en Copyright © 2020 Martens, Niemann and Dick. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Psychology Martens, Thomas Niemann, Moritz Dick, Uwe Sensor Measures of Affective Leaning |
title | Sensor Measures of Affective Leaning |
title_full | Sensor Measures of Affective Leaning |
title_fullStr | Sensor Measures of Affective Leaning |
title_full_unstemmed | Sensor Measures of Affective Leaning |
title_short | Sensor Measures of Affective Leaning |
title_sort | sensor measures of affective leaning |
topic | Psychology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7203482/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32425838 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00379 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT martensthomas sensormeasuresofaffectiveleaning AT niemannmoritz sensormeasuresofaffectiveleaning AT dickuwe sensormeasuresofaffectiveleaning |