Cargando…
Methods and reporting of systematic reviews of comparative accuracy were deficient: a methodological survey and proposed guidance
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to examine methodological and reporting characteristics of systematic reviews and meta-analyses which compare diagnostic test accuracy (DTA) of multiple index tests, identify good practice, and develop guidance for better reporting. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING...
Autores principales: | Takwoingi, Yemisi, Partlett, Christopher, Riley, Richard D., Hyde, Chris, Deeks, Jonathan J. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7203546/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31843693 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.12.007 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies in mental health
por: Takwoingi, Yemisi, et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Performance of methods for meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy with few studies or sparse data
por: Takwoingi, Yemisi, et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Cochrane diagnostic test accuracy reviews
por: Leeflang, Mariska MG, et al.
Publicado: (2013) -
Health Technology Assessment of Diagnostic Tests: A state of the art review of methods guidance from international organisations
por: di Ruffano, Lavinia Ferrante, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Eustachian tube dysfunction: A diagnostic accuracy study and proposed diagnostic pathway
por: Smith, Matthew E., et al.
Publicado: (2018)