Cargando…

Spatial patterns in prostate Cancer-specific mortality in Pennsylvania using Pennsylvania Cancer registry data, 2004–2014

BACKGROUND: Spatial heterogeneity of prostate cancer-specific mortality in Pennsylvania remains unclear. We utilized advanced geospatial survival regressions to examine spatial variation of prostate cancer-specific mortality in PA and evaluate potential effects of individual- and county-level risk f...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Ming, Wasserman, Emily, Geyer, Nathaniel, Carroll, Rachel M., Zhao, Shanshan, Zhang, Lijun, Hohl, Raymond, Lengerich, Eugene J., McDonald, Alicia C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7203834/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32375682
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-020-06902-5
_version_ 1783529943981883392
author Wang, Ming
Wasserman, Emily
Geyer, Nathaniel
Carroll, Rachel M.
Zhao, Shanshan
Zhang, Lijun
Hohl, Raymond
Lengerich, Eugene J.
McDonald, Alicia C.
author_facet Wang, Ming
Wasserman, Emily
Geyer, Nathaniel
Carroll, Rachel M.
Zhao, Shanshan
Zhang, Lijun
Hohl, Raymond
Lengerich, Eugene J.
McDonald, Alicia C.
author_sort Wang, Ming
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Spatial heterogeneity of prostate cancer-specific mortality in Pennsylvania remains unclear. We utilized advanced geospatial survival regressions to examine spatial variation of prostate cancer-specific mortality in PA and evaluate potential effects of individual- and county-level risk factors. METHODS: Prostate cancer cases, aged ≥40 years, were identified in the 2004–2014 Pennsylvania Cancer Registry. The 2018 County Health Rankings data and the 2014 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s Environmental Quality Index were used to extract county-level data. The accelerated failure time models with spatial frailties for geographical correlations were used to assess prostate cancer-specific mortality rates for Pennsylvania and by the Penn State Cancer Institute (PSCI) 28-county catchment area. Secondary assessment based on estimated spatial frailties was conducted to identify potential health and environmental risk factors for mortality. RESULTS: There were 94,274 cases included. The 5-year survival rate in PA was 82% (95% confidence interval, CI: 81.1–82.8%), with the catchment area having a lower survival rate 81% (95% CI: 79.5–82.6%) compared to the non-catchment area rate of 82.3% (95% CI: 81.4–83.2%). Black men, uninsured, more aggressive prostate cancer, rural and urban Appalachia, positive lymph nodes, and no definitive treatment were associated with lower survival. Several county-level health (i.e., poor physical activity) and environmental factors in air and land (i.e., defoliate chemical applied) were associated with higher mortality rates. CONCLUSIONS: Spatial variations in prostate cancer-specific mortality rates exist in Pennsylvania with a higher risk in the PSCI’s catchment area, in particular, rural-Appalachia. County-level health and environmental factors may contribute to spatial heterogeneity in prostate cancer-specific mortality.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7203834
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72038342020-05-09 Spatial patterns in prostate Cancer-specific mortality in Pennsylvania using Pennsylvania Cancer registry data, 2004–2014 Wang, Ming Wasserman, Emily Geyer, Nathaniel Carroll, Rachel M. Zhao, Shanshan Zhang, Lijun Hohl, Raymond Lengerich, Eugene J. McDonald, Alicia C. BMC Cancer Research Article BACKGROUND: Spatial heterogeneity of prostate cancer-specific mortality in Pennsylvania remains unclear. We utilized advanced geospatial survival regressions to examine spatial variation of prostate cancer-specific mortality in PA and evaluate potential effects of individual- and county-level risk factors. METHODS: Prostate cancer cases, aged ≥40 years, were identified in the 2004–2014 Pennsylvania Cancer Registry. The 2018 County Health Rankings data and the 2014 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s Environmental Quality Index were used to extract county-level data. The accelerated failure time models with spatial frailties for geographical correlations were used to assess prostate cancer-specific mortality rates for Pennsylvania and by the Penn State Cancer Institute (PSCI) 28-county catchment area. Secondary assessment based on estimated spatial frailties was conducted to identify potential health and environmental risk factors for mortality. RESULTS: There were 94,274 cases included. The 5-year survival rate in PA was 82% (95% confidence interval, CI: 81.1–82.8%), with the catchment area having a lower survival rate 81% (95% CI: 79.5–82.6%) compared to the non-catchment area rate of 82.3% (95% CI: 81.4–83.2%). Black men, uninsured, more aggressive prostate cancer, rural and urban Appalachia, positive lymph nodes, and no definitive treatment were associated with lower survival. Several county-level health (i.e., poor physical activity) and environmental factors in air and land (i.e., defoliate chemical applied) were associated with higher mortality rates. CONCLUSIONS: Spatial variations in prostate cancer-specific mortality rates exist in Pennsylvania with a higher risk in the PSCI’s catchment area, in particular, rural-Appalachia. County-level health and environmental factors may contribute to spatial heterogeneity in prostate cancer-specific mortality. BioMed Central 2020-05-06 /pmc/articles/PMC7203834/ /pubmed/32375682 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-020-06902-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Wang, Ming
Wasserman, Emily
Geyer, Nathaniel
Carroll, Rachel M.
Zhao, Shanshan
Zhang, Lijun
Hohl, Raymond
Lengerich, Eugene J.
McDonald, Alicia C.
Spatial patterns in prostate Cancer-specific mortality in Pennsylvania using Pennsylvania Cancer registry data, 2004–2014
title Spatial patterns in prostate Cancer-specific mortality in Pennsylvania using Pennsylvania Cancer registry data, 2004–2014
title_full Spatial patterns in prostate Cancer-specific mortality in Pennsylvania using Pennsylvania Cancer registry data, 2004–2014
title_fullStr Spatial patterns in prostate Cancer-specific mortality in Pennsylvania using Pennsylvania Cancer registry data, 2004–2014
title_full_unstemmed Spatial patterns in prostate Cancer-specific mortality in Pennsylvania using Pennsylvania Cancer registry data, 2004–2014
title_short Spatial patterns in prostate Cancer-specific mortality in Pennsylvania using Pennsylvania Cancer registry data, 2004–2014
title_sort spatial patterns in prostate cancer-specific mortality in pennsylvania using pennsylvania cancer registry data, 2004–2014
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7203834/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32375682
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-020-06902-5
work_keys_str_mv AT wangming spatialpatternsinprostatecancerspecificmortalityinpennsylvaniausingpennsylvaniacancerregistrydata20042014
AT wassermanemily spatialpatternsinprostatecancerspecificmortalityinpennsylvaniausingpennsylvaniacancerregistrydata20042014
AT geyernathaniel spatialpatternsinprostatecancerspecificmortalityinpennsylvaniausingpennsylvaniacancerregistrydata20042014
AT carrollrachelm spatialpatternsinprostatecancerspecificmortalityinpennsylvaniausingpennsylvaniacancerregistrydata20042014
AT zhaoshanshan spatialpatternsinprostatecancerspecificmortalityinpennsylvaniausingpennsylvaniacancerregistrydata20042014
AT zhanglijun spatialpatternsinprostatecancerspecificmortalityinpennsylvaniausingpennsylvaniacancerregistrydata20042014
AT hohlraymond spatialpatternsinprostatecancerspecificmortalityinpennsylvaniausingpennsylvaniacancerregistrydata20042014
AT lengericheugenej spatialpatternsinprostatecancerspecificmortalityinpennsylvaniausingpennsylvaniacancerregistrydata20042014
AT mcdonaldaliciac spatialpatternsinprostatecancerspecificmortalityinpennsylvaniausingpennsylvaniacancerregistrydata20042014