Cargando…

Checklists to detect potential predatory biomedical journals: a systematic review

BACKGROUND: The increase in the number of predatory journals puts scholarly communication at risk. In order to guard against publication in predatory journals, authors may use checklists to help detect predatory journals. We believe there are a large number of such checklists yet it is uncertain whe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Cukier, Samantha, Helal, Lucas, Rice, Danielle B., Pupkaite, Justina, Ahmadzai, Nadera, Wilson, Mitchell, Skidmore, Becky, Lalu, Manoj M., Moher, David
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	BioMed Central 2020
Materias:	Research Article
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7203891/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32375818 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-020-01566-1

Ejemplares similares

What is a predatory journal? A scoping review
por: Cobey, Kelly D., et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Defining predatory journals and responding to the threat they pose: a modified Delphi consensus process
por: Cukier, Samantha, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Knowledge and motivations of researchers publishing in presumed predatory journals: a survey
por: Cobey, Kelly D, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Dealing with predatory journal articles captured in systematic reviews
por: Rice, Danielle B., et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Stress testing journals: a quasi-experimental study of rejection rates of a previously published paper
por: Cobey, Kelly D., et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Predatory journals: The rise of worthless biomedical science
por: Sharma, H, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Potential predatory and legitimate biomedical journals: can you tell the difference? A cross-sectional comparison
por: Shamseer, Larissa, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Assessing the impact of predatory journals on policy and guidance documents: a cross-sectional study protocol
por: Brandts-Longtin, Olivier, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

A protocol for a network meta-analysis of interventions to treat patients with sudden sensorineural hearing loss
por: Ahmadzai, Nadera, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Perspectives From Authors and Editors in the Biomedical Disciplines on Predatory Journals: Survey Study
por: Cohen, Andrew J, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Predatory Journals: What are they?
por: Shyam, Ashok
Publicado: (2015)

Beware of predatory journals
por: Rydholm, Anders
Publicado: (2017)

Predatory or Legitimate Journals
por: Habibzadeh, Farrokh
Publicado: (2017)

The Scourge of Predatory Journals
por: Kumar, Ranesh, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

A protocol for a systematic review of the diagnostic accuracy of blood markers, synovial fluid, and tissue testing in periprosthetic joint infections (PJI)
por: Beaule, Paul E., et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Erratum to: A protocol for a systematic review of the diagnostic accuracy of blood markers, synovial fluid, and tissue testing in periprosthetic joint infections (PJI)
por: Beaule, Paul E., et al.
Publicado: (2016)

A systematic review and network meta-analysis of existing pharmacologic therapies in patients with idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss
por: Ahmadzai, Nadera, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Comment on “scrutinizing predatory journals in pharmacology and calculating their predatory rate”
por: Kakamad, Fahmi Hussein, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Problems and challenges of predatory journals
por: Richtig, G., et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Not All Young Journals Are Predatory
por: Singer, Adam
Publicado: (2017)

Identifying predatory or pseudo-journals
por: Laine, Christine, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Indian Science and Predatory Journals
por: Patwardhan, Bhushan
Publicado: (2017)

The Perils of Predatory Journals and Conferences
por: Ibrahim, S, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

The Pandora's box of predatory journals
por: Quintans-Júnior, Lucindo J., et al.
Publicado: (2023)

"Predatory Journals" or "Predatory Scholars?" The Essential Role of the Peer Review Process
por: Chirico, Francesco
Publicado: (2017)

The Quality of Statistical Reporting and Data Presentation in Predatory Dental Journals Was Lower Than in Non-Predatory Journals
por: Nieminen, Pentti, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Journal editors’ perspectives on the communication practices in biomedical journals: a qualitative study
por: Glonti, Ketevan, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Letter to the Editor: Comment on Predatory Journals
por: Jawad, Fatema
Publicado: (2017)

Ethical issues in publishing in predatory journals
por: Ferris, Lorraine E., et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Medical publishing and the threat of predatory journals
por: Beall, Jeffrey
Publicado: (2016)

Ethical issues in publishing in predatory journals
por: Ferris, Lorraine E., et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Predatory journal publishing: Is this an alternate universe?
por: Harvey, Edward, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Canadian academics’ use of predatory journals
por: Babb, Maureen
Publicado: (2021)

Predatory journals: The dark side of publications
por: Gurnani, Bharat, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Safety of influenza vaccination during pregnancy: a systematic review
por: Wolfe, Dianna M, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Reliability of the PEDro scale: comparison between trials published in predatory and non-predatory journals
por: Paci, Matteo, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Journal editors’ perspectives on the roles and tasks of peer reviewers in biomedical journals: a qualitative study
por: Glonti, Ketevan, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Predatory journals- Can we stem the rot?
por: Gogtay, NJ, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Predatory journals and their effects on scientific research community
por: Habibzadeh, Farrokh, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Editorial misconduct: the case of online predatory journals
por: Gallent Torres, Cinta
Publicado: (2022)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_5ocj8b71876nqlr6a74tfh7har