Cargando…

Creation and validation of the 4-item BriefPCS-chronic through methodological triangulation

BACKGROUND: The Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) is a widely used self-report tool to evaluate pain related catastrophizing. The PCS was developed using classical test theory and has been shown to be psychometrically sound among various populations. However, it’s current three subscales are rarely u...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Walton, David M., Mehta, Swati, Seo, Wonjin, MacDermid, Joy C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7204020/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32381020
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12955-020-01346-8
_version_ 1783529978571259904
author Walton, David M.
Mehta, Swati
Seo, Wonjin
MacDermid, Joy C.
author_facet Walton, David M.
Mehta, Swati
Seo, Wonjin
MacDermid, Joy C.
author_sort Walton, David M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) is a widely used self-report tool to evaluate pain related catastrophizing. The PCS was developed using classical test theory and has been shown to be psychometrically sound among various populations. However, it’s current three subscales are rarely used in clinical practice, offering potential for an abbreviated version that reduces administrative burden and can be used to estimate full scale scores, yet is not bound by the inclusion of items from each subscale. Hence, the aim of the current study was to develop a unidimensional abbreviated version of the PCS through findings from qualitative, classical test theory, and newer Rasch analysis. METHODS: The current cross-sectional study used data from the Quebec Pain Registry (n = 5646) to obtain PCS scores of people seeking care at tertiary chronic pain centres. To develop an abbreviated unidimensional tool, items were removed based on triangulation of qualitative review of each item and response, corrected item-total correlations, and Rasch analysis. Confirmatory factor analysis was conducted on the final remaining items to confirm the tool was assessing a single latent construct (catastrophizing). Fit was assessed using the cumulative fit index (CFI), Tucker Lewis Index (TLI), and root-mean-squared error of approximation (RMSEA). RESULTS: After triangulation, a final abbreviated 4-item scale showed adequate model fit with a strong correlation (r > 0.95) with the original scale and properties that were stable across age, sex, cause, and medicolegal status. Additionally, the brief version addressed some problematic wording on some items on the original scale. Both the original and new abbreviated tool were associated with the Beck Depression Inventory and the Brief Pain Inventory at the same magnitude. CONCLUSION: The abbreviated scale may allow for a decrease in administrator burden and greater clinical uptake when a quick screen for exaggerated negative orientation towards pain is needed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7204020
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72040202020-05-12 Creation and validation of the 4-item BriefPCS-chronic through methodological triangulation Walton, David M. Mehta, Swati Seo, Wonjin MacDermid, Joy C. Health Qual Life Outcomes Research BACKGROUND: The Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) is a widely used self-report tool to evaluate pain related catastrophizing. The PCS was developed using classical test theory and has been shown to be psychometrically sound among various populations. However, it’s current three subscales are rarely used in clinical practice, offering potential for an abbreviated version that reduces administrative burden and can be used to estimate full scale scores, yet is not bound by the inclusion of items from each subscale. Hence, the aim of the current study was to develop a unidimensional abbreviated version of the PCS through findings from qualitative, classical test theory, and newer Rasch analysis. METHODS: The current cross-sectional study used data from the Quebec Pain Registry (n = 5646) to obtain PCS scores of people seeking care at tertiary chronic pain centres. To develop an abbreviated unidimensional tool, items were removed based on triangulation of qualitative review of each item and response, corrected item-total correlations, and Rasch analysis. Confirmatory factor analysis was conducted on the final remaining items to confirm the tool was assessing a single latent construct (catastrophizing). Fit was assessed using the cumulative fit index (CFI), Tucker Lewis Index (TLI), and root-mean-squared error of approximation (RMSEA). RESULTS: After triangulation, a final abbreviated 4-item scale showed adequate model fit with a strong correlation (r > 0.95) with the original scale and properties that were stable across age, sex, cause, and medicolegal status. Additionally, the brief version addressed some problematic wording on some items on the original scale. Both the original and new abbreviated tool were associated with the Beck Depression Inventory and the Brief Pain Inventory at the same magnitude. CONCLUSION: The abbreviated scale may allow for a decrease in administrator burden and greater clinical uptake when a quick screen for exaggerated negative orientation towards pain is needed. BioMed Central 2020-05-07 /pmc/articles/PMC7204020/ /pubmed/32381020 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12955-020-01346-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Walton, David M.
Mehta, Swati
Seo, Wonjin
MacDermid, Joy C.
Creation and validation of the 4-item BriefPCS-chronic through methodological triangulation
title Creation and validation of the 4-item BriefPCS-chronic through methodological triangulation
title_full Creation and validation of the 4-item BriefPCS-chronic through methodological triangulation
title_fullStr Creation and validation of the 4-item BriefPCS-chronic through methodological triangulation
title_full_unstemmed Creation and validation of the 4-item BriefPCS-chronic through methodological triangulation
title_short Creation and validation of the 4-item BriefPCS-chronic through methodological triangulation
title_sort creation and validation of the 4-item briefpcs-chronic through methodological triangulation
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7204020/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32381020
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12955-020-01346-8
work_keys_str_mv AT waltondavidm creationandvalidationofthe4itembriefpcschronicthroughmethodologicaltriangulation
AT mehtaswati creationandvalidationofthe4itembriefpcschronicthroughmethodologicaltriangulation
AT seowonjin creationandvalidationofthe4itembriefpcschronicthroughmethodologicaltriangulation
AT macdermidjoyc creationandvalidationofthe4itembriefpcschronicthroughmethodologicaltriangulation