Cargando…

Laparoscopic Suture versus Mesh Rectopexy for the Treatment of Persistent Complete Rectal Prolapse in Children: A Comparative Randomized Study

PURPOSE: To compare laparoscopic mesh rectopexy with laparoscopic suture rectopexy. Patients and Methods. The prospective study was conducted at Pediatric Surgery Department, Al-Azhar University Hospitals, Cairo, Egypt between Feb 2010 and Jan 2015. Seventy-eight children with persistent complete re...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yehya, AbdelAziz, Gamaan, Ibrahim, Abdelrazek, Mohamed, Shahin, Mohamed, Seddek, Ashraf, Abdelhafez, Mohamed
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7204089/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32411460
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/3057528
_version_ 1783529990862667776
author Yehya, AbdelAziz
Gamaan, Ibrahim
Abdelrazek, Mohamed
Shahin, Mohamed
Seddek, Ashraf
Abdelhafez, Mohamed
author_facet Yehya, AbdelAziz
Gamaan, Ibrahim
Abdelrazek, Mohamed
Shahin, Mohamed
Seddek, Ashraf
Abdelhafez, Mohamed
author_sort Yehya, AbdelAziz
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To compare laparoscopic mesh rectopexy with laparoscopic suture rectopexy. Patients and Methods. The prospective study was conducted at Pediatric Surgery Department, Al-Azhar University Hospitals, Cairo, Egypt between Feb 2010 and Jan 2015. Seventy-eight children with persistent complete rectal prolapse were subjected to laparoscopic rectopexy. Fourteen parents refused to participate. All patients received initial conservative treatment for more than one year. The remaining 64 patients were randomized divided into two equal groups. Group A; 32 patients underwent laparoscopic mesh rectopexy and group B, 32 underwent laparoscopic suture rectopexy. The operative time, recurrence rate, post-operative constipation, and effect on fecal incontinence, were reported and evaluated for each group. RESULTS: Sixty-four cases presented with persistent complete rectal prolapse were the material of this study. They were 40 males and 24 females. Mean age at operation was 8 (5–12) years. All cases were completed laparoscopically. Mean operative time in laparoscopic suture rectopexy was shorter than laparoscopic mesh rectopexy group. No early post-operative complications were encountered. No cases of recurrence with mesh rectopexy group while in suture rectopexy group it was 4 cases (14.2%). Post-operative constipation occurred in one case (3.57%) in suture rectopexy group and occurred in one case (3.3%) in mesh rectopexy group. Fecal incontinence improved in 26/28 cases (92.8%) in suture rectopexy while in mesh rectopexy it was improved in 30/30 cases (100%) of cases. CONCLUSION: Both laparoscopic mesh and suture rectopexy are feasible and reliable methods for the treatment of complete rectal prolapse in children. However, no recurrence, low incidence of constipation and high improvement of incontinence at follow up more than 36 months with mesh rectopexy accordingly, we considered mesh rectopexy to be the procedure of choice in treatment of complete rectal prolapse.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7204089
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72040892020-05-14 Laparoscopic Suture versus Mesh Rectopexy for the Treatment of Persistent Complete Rectal Prolapse in Children: A Comparative Randomized Study Yehya, AbdelAziz Gamaan, Ibrahim Abdelrazek, Mohamed Shahin, Mohamed Seddek, Ashraf Abdelhafez, Mohamed Minim Invasive Surg Clinical Study PURPOSE: To compare laparoscopic mesh rectopexy with laparoscopic suture rectopexy. Patients and Methods. The prospective study was conducted at Pediatric Surgery Department, Al-Azhar University Hospitals, Cairo, Egypt between Feb 2010 and Jan 2015. Seventy-eight children with persistent complete rectal prolapse were subjected to laparoscopic rectopexy. Fourteen parents refused to participate. All patients received initial conservative treatment for more than one year. The remaining 64 patients were randomized divided into two equal groups. Group A; 32 patients underwent laparoscopic mesh rectopexy and group B, 32 underwent laparoscopic suture rectopexy. The operative time, recurrence rate, post-operative constipation, and effect on fecal incontinence, were reported and evaluated for each group. RESULTS: Sixty-four cases presented with persistent complete rectal prolapse were the material of this study. They were 40 males and 24 females. Mean age at operation was 8 (5–12) years. All cases were completed laparoscopically. Mean operative time in laparoscopic suture rectopexy was shorter than laparoscopic mesh rectopexy group. No early post-operative complications were encountered. No cases of recurrence with mesh rectopexy group while in suture rectopexy group it was 4 cases (14.2%). Post-operative constipation occurred in one case (3.57%) in suture rectopexy group and occurred in one case (3.3%) in mesh rectopexy group. Fecal incontinence improved in 26/28 cases (92.8%) in suture rectopexy while in mesh rectopexy it was improved in 30/30 cases (100%) of cases. CONCLUSION: Both laparoscopic mesh and suture rectopexy are feasible and reliable methods for the treatment of complete rectal prolapse in children. However, no recurrence, low incidence of constipation and high improvement of incontinence at follow up more than 36 months with mesh rectopexy accordingly, we considered mesh rectopexy to be the procedure of choice in treatment of complete rectal prolapse. Hindawi 2020-01-22 /pmc/articles/PMC7204089/ /pubmed/32411460 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/3057528 Text en Copyright © 2020 AbdelAziz Yehya et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Study
Yehya, AbdelAziz
Gamaan, Ibrahim
Abdelrazek, Mohamed
Shahin, Mohamed
Seddek, Ashraf
Abdelhafez, Mohamed
Laparoscopic Suture versus Mesh Rectopexy for the Treatment of Persistent Complete Rectal Prolapse in Children: A Comparative Randomized Study
title Laparoscopic Suture versus Mesh Rectopexy for the Treatment of Persistent Complete Rectal Prolapse in Children: A Comparative Randomized Study
title_full Laparoscopic Suture versus Mesh Rectopexy for the Treatment of Persistent Complete Rectal Prolapse in Children: A Comparative Randomized Study
title_fullStr Laparoscopic Suture versus Mesh Rectopexy for the Treatment of Persistent Complete Rectal Prolapse in Children: A Comparative Randomized Study
title_full_unstemmed Laparoscopic Suture versus Mesh Rectopexy for the Treatment of Persistent Complete Rectal Prolapse in Children: A Comparative Randomized Study
title_short Laparoscopic Suture versus Mesh Rectopexy for the Treatment of Persistent Complete Rectal Prolapse in Children: A Comparative Randomized Study
title_sort laparoscopic suture versus mesh rectopexy for the treatment of persistent complete rectal prolapse in children: a comparative randomized study
topic Clinical Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7204089/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32411460
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/3057528
work_keys_str_mv AT yehyaabdelaziz laparoscopicsutureversusmeshrectopexyforthetreatmentofpersistentcompleterectalprolapseinchildrenacomparativerandomizedstudy
AT gamaanibrahim laparoscopicsutureversusmeshrectopexyforthetreatmentofpersistentcompleterectalprolapseinchildrenacomparativerandomizedstudy
AT abdelrazekmohamed laparoscopicsutureversusmeshrectopexyforthetreatmentofpersistentcompleterectalprolapseinchildrenacomparativerandomizedstudy
AT shahinmohamed laparoscopicsutureversusmeshrectopexyforthetreatmentofpersistentcompleterectalprolapseinchildrenacomparativerandomizedstudy
AT seddekashraf laparoscopicsutureversusmeshrectopexyforthetreatmentofpersistentcompleterectalprolapseinchildrenacomparativerandomizedstudy
AT abdelhafezmohamed laparoscopicsutureversusmeshrectopexyforthetreatmentofpersistentcompleterectalprolapseinchildrenacomparativerandomizedstudy