Cargando…
Validation of the Hungarian version of the SRI Questionnaire
BACKGROUND: Home mechanical ventilation is a reliable treatment for patients suffering from chronic respiratory failure, improving survival and quality of life. Prevalence has been increasing worldwide as a result of evolving technical possibilities, telemedicine and improving national guidelines. P...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7204221/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32380984 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12890-020-1171-5 |
_version_ | 1783530020299341824 |
---|---|
author | Valko, Luca Baglyas, Szabolcs Kunos, Laszlo Terray-Horvath, Attila Lorx, Andras Gal, Janos Windisch, Wolfram |
author_facet | Valko, Luca Baglyas, Szabolcs Kunos, Laszlo Terray-Horvath, Attila Lorx, Andras Gal, Janos Windisch, Wolfram |
author_sort | Valko, Luca |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Home mechanical ventilation is a reliable treatment for patients suffering from chronic respiratory failure, improving survival and quality of life. Prevalence has been increasing worldwide as a result of evolving technical possibilities, telemedicine and improving national guidelines. Projects to establish a national guideline and registry for patients treated with home mechanical ventilation are currently under way in Hungary and our aim was to validate a quality of life questionnaire suited for evaluation and follow up in this specific patient group. The Severe Respiratory Insufficiency Questionnaire (SRI) is a quality of life tool designed to evaluate patients receiving home mechanical ventilation and has been validated both in patient groups receiving invasive and noninvasive ventilation. METHODS: The Hungarian version of the SRI was created using the translation-backtranslation method, which was then tested for validity, viability and reliability in a cohort involving patients from three centers, receiving long-term home mechanical ventilation for chronic respiratory failure through an invasive or noninvasive interface. Patient data was collected (demographic data, lung function test, arterial blood gas, ventilation settings) and quality of life was measured with the previously validated SF-36 and newly created Hungarian SRI Questionnaires at two time points. RESULTS: One hundred four patients receiving home mechanical ventilation were enrolled. The time to complete the SRI Questionnaire was 8.6 (±3.1) minutes, 69.2% questionnaires were self-administered. Exploratory factor analysis explained 73.8% of the variance of the questionnaire, but resulted in 13 scales. We found correlations between the SRI subscale scores to corresponding scales of the previously validated general quality of life survey SF-36. The Cronbach alpha coefficient was 0.928 for the Summary Scale of the SRI Questionnaire, proving high internal consistency. Reproducibility was high for most scales, resulting in a high overall correlation for the summary score (0.877, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The Hungarian version of the SRI Questionnaire is a viable, valid, reliable and reproduceable quality of life tool applicable for patients treated with home mechanical ventilation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7204221 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72042212020-05-12 Validation of the Hungarian version of the SRI Questionnaire Valko, Luca Baglyas, Szabolcs Kunos, Laszlo Terray-Horvath, Attila Lorx, Andras Gal, Janos Windisch, Wolfram BMC Pulm Med Research Article BACKGROUND: Home mechanical ventilation is a reliable treatment for patients suffering from chronic respiratory failure, improving survival and quality of life. Prevalence has been increasing worldwide as a result of evolving technical possibilities, telemedicine and improving national guidelines. Projects to establish a national guideline and registry for patients treated with home mechanical ventilation are currently under way in Hungary and our aim was to validate a quality of life questionnaire suited for evaluation and follow up in this specific patient group. The Severe Respiratory Insufficiency Questionnaire (SRI) is a quality of life tool designed to evaluate patients receiving home mechanical ventilation and has been validated both in patient groups receiving invasive and noninvasive ventilation. METHODS: The Hungarian version of the SRI was created using the translation-backtranslation method, which was then tested for validity, viability and reliability in a cohort involving patients from three centers, receiving long-term home mechanical ventilation for chronic respiratory failure through an invasive or noninvasive interface. Patient data was collected (demographic data, lung function test, arterial blood gas, ventilation settings) and quality of life was measured with the previously validated SF-36 and newly created Hungarian SRI Questionnaires at two time points. RESULTS: One hundred four patients receiving home mechanical ventilation were enrolled. The time to complete the SRI Questionnaire was 8.6 (±3.1) minutes, 69.2% questionnaires were self-administered. Exploratory factor analysis explained 73.8% of the variance of the questionnaire, but resulted in 13 scales. We found correlations between the SRI subscale scores to corresponding scales of the previously validated general quality of life survey SF-36. The Cronbach alpha coefficient was 0.928 for the Summary Scale of the SRI Questionnaire, proving high internal consistency. Reproducibility was high for most scales, resulting in a high overall correlation for the summary score (0.877, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The Hungarian version of the SRI Questionnaire is a viable, valid, reliable and reproduceable quality of life tool applicable for patients treated with home mechanical ventilation. BioMed Central 2020-05-07 /pmc/articles/PMC7204221/ /pubmed/32380984 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12890-020-1171-5 Text en © The Author(s). 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Valko, Luca Baglyas, Szabolcs Kunos, Laszlo Terray-Horvath, Attila Lorx, Andras Gal, Janos Windisch, Wolfram Validation of the Hungarian version of the SRI Questionnaire |
title | Validation of the Hungarian version of the SRI Questionnaire |
title_full | Validation of the Hungarian version of the SRI Questionnaire |
title_fullStr | Validation of the Hungarian version of the SRI Questionnaire |
title_full_unstemmed | Validation of the Hungarian version of the SRI Questionnaire |
title_short | Validation of the Hungarian version of the SRI Questionnaire |
title_sort | validation of the hungarian version of the sri questionnaire |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7204221/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32380984 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12890-020-1171-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT valkoluca validationofthehungarianversionofthesriquestionnaire AT baglyasszabolcs validationofthehungarianversionofthesriquestionnaire AT kunoslaszlo validationofthehungarianversionofthesriquestionnaire AT terrayhorvathattila validationofthehungarianversionofthesriquestionnaire AT lorxandras validationofthehungarianversionofthesriquestionnaire AT galjanos validationofthehungarianversionofthesriquestionnaire AT windischwolfram validationofthehungarianversionofthesriquestionnaire |