Cargando…

Blended Vision Achieved by Combining High and Low Addition Power Diffractive Intraocular Lenses with Micromonovision: A Clinical Outcome

PURPOSE: To evaluate the clinical outcome of blended vision combined with micromonovision (MMBV) using a +4 diopter (D) addition power (add) diffractive intraocular lens (MIOL) and a +2.75D add MIOL with a myopic target of −0.5 D. METHODS: One hundred twenty eyes of 60 cases were enrolled. The +4 D...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ouchi, Masayuki, Shiba, Takuya
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7204239/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32411432
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/6143832
_version_ 1783530024339505152
author Ouchi, Masayuki
Shiba, Takuya
author_facet Ouchi, Masayuki
Shiba, Takuya
author_sort Ouchi, Masayuki
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To evaluate the clinical outcome of blended vision combined with micromonovision (MMBV) using a +4 diopter (D) addition power (add) diffractive intraocular lens (MIOL) and a +2.75D add MIOL with a myopic target of −0.5 D. METHODS: One hundred twenty eyes of 60 cases were enrolled. The +4 D add MIOLs were placed in the nondominant eye, the +2.75 D add MIOLs were placed in the dominant eye with a myopic target of −0.5 D in 30 cases (the MMBV group), and the +4 D add MIOLs were placed in both eyes in another 30 cases (controls). Postoperative clinical outcomes were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: Compared with the controls, binocular uncorrected intermediate vision at 70 cm was significantly better in the MMBV group (p=0.02). Contrast sensitivity at 12 cycles per degree and the 6% and 12.5% low-contrast visual acuities were also significantly better in the MMBV group compared with the controls (p values = 0.05, 0.05, and 0.04, respectively). Uncorrected and corrected distance and near VA did not differ significantly between the two groups. CONCLUSION: MMBV provided a better intermediate VA, contrast sensitivity, and low-contrast VA than bilateral implantation of the +4 D add MIOL, while preserving comparable near and distance vision.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7204239
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72042392020-05-14 Blended Vision Achieved by Combining High and Low Addition Power Diffractive Intraocular Lenses with Micromonovision: A Clinical Outcome Ouchi, Masayuki Shiba, Takuya J Ophthalmol Clinical Study PURPOSE: To evaluate the clinical outcome of blended vision combined with micromonovision (MMBV) using a +4 diopter (D) addition power (add) diffractive intraocular lens (MIOL) and a +2.75D add MIOL with a myopic target of −0.5 D. METHODS: One hundred twenty eyes of 60 cases were enrolled. The +4 D add MIOLs were placed in the nondominant eye, the +2.75 D add MIOLs were placed in the dominant eye with a myopic target of −0.5 D in 30 cases (the MMBV group), and the +4 D add MIOLs were placed in both eyes in another 30 cases (controls). Postoperative clinical outcomes were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: Compared with the controls, binocular uncorrected intermediate vision at 70 cm was significantly better in the MMBV group (p=0.02). Contrast sensitivity at 12 cycles per degree and the 6% and 12.5% low-contrast visual acuities were also significantly better in the MMBV group compared with the controls (p values = 0.05, 0.05, and 0.04, respectively). Uncorrected and corrected distance and near VA did not differ significantly between the two groups. CONCLUSION: MMBV provided a better intermediate VA, contrast sensitivity, and low-contrast VA than bilateral implantation of the +4 D add MIOL, while preserving comparable near and distance vision. Hindawi 2020-04-27 /pmc/articles/PMC7204239/ /pubmed/32411432 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/6143832 Text en Copyright © 2020 Masayuki Ouchi and Takuya Shiba. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Study
Ouchi, Masayuki
Shiba, Takuya
Blended Vision Achieved by Combining High and Low Addition Power Diffractive Intraocular Lenses with Micromonovision: A Clinical Outcome
title Blended Vision Achieved by Combining High and Low Addition Power Diffractive Intraocular Lenses with Micromonovision: A Clinical Outcome
title_full Blended Vision Achieved by Combining High and Low Addition Power Diffractive Intraocular Lenses with Micromonovision: A Clinical Outcome
title_fullStr Blended Vision Achieved by Combining High and Low Addition Power Diffractive Intraocular Lenses with Micromonovision: A Clinical Outcome
title_full_unstemmed Blended Vision Achieved by Combining High and Low Addition Power Diffractive Intraocular Lenses with Micromonovision: A Clinical Outcome
title_short Blended Vision Achieved by Combining High and Low Addition Power Diffractive Intraocular Lenses with Micromonovision: A Clinical Outcome
title_sort blended vision achieved by combining high and low addition power diffractive intraocular lenses with micromonovision: a clinical outcome
topic Clinical Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7204239/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32411432
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/6143832
work_keys_str_mv AT ouchimasayuki blendedvisionachievedbycombininghighandlowadditionpowerdiffractiveintraocularlenseswithmicromonovisionaclinicaloutcome
AT shibatakuya blendedvisionachievedbycombininghighandlowadditionpowerdiffractiveintraocularlenseswithmicromonovisionaclinicaloutcome