Cargando…
Point-of-care bedside ultrasound examination for the exclusion of clinically significant ankle and fifth metatarsal bone fractures; a single blinded prospective diagnostic cohort study
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the diagnostic value of point-of-care bedside ultrasound (PoCUS) as in usual clinical practice in suspected ankle and fifth metatarsal bone fractures, compared to the standard of radiographic imaging. METHODS: This prospective study included patients ≥1...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7204241/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32381048 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13047-020-00387-y |
_version_ | 1783530024804024320 |
---|---|
author | Crombach, Aniek Azizi, Nasim Lameijer, Heleen El Moumni, Mostafa ter Maaten, Jan C. |
author_facet | Crombach, Aniek Azizi, Nasim Lameijer, Heleen El Moumni, Mostafa ter Maaten, Jan C. |
author_sort | Crombach, Aniek |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the diagnostic value of point-of-care bedside ultrasound (PoCUS) as in usual clinical practice in suspected ankle and fifth metatarsal bone fractures, compared to the standard of radiographic imaging. METHODS: This prospective study included patients ≥17 years presenting to the Emergency Department with ankle trauma and positive Ottawa Ankle Rules. All patients underwent PoCUS of the ankle by a (resident) emergency physician, the images were assessed by an ultrasound expert. Both were blinded for the medical history and clinical findings of the patients. Radiography of the ankle followed, evaluated by a radiologist blinded from the PoCUS findings. Primary outcome measures were sensitivity and specificity of PoCUS. RESULTS: A total of 242 patients were included, with 35 (22%) clinically significant (non-avulsion) fractures observed with radiography. The sensitivity of PoCUS in detecting clinically significant fractures by all sonographers was 80.0% (95% Confidence Interval (CI) 63.0 to 91.6%), specificity 90.3% (95% CI 83.7 to 94.9%), positive predictive value 70.0% (95% CI 57.0 to 80.3%) and the negative predictive value 94.1% (95% CI 89.1 to 96.9%). The sensitivity of PoCUS in detecting clinically significant fractures by the expert was 82.8% (95% CI 66.3 to 93.4%), specificity 99.2% (95% CI 95.5 to 99.9%), positive predictive value 96.7% (95% CI 80.3 to 99.5%) and the negative predictive value 95.3% (95% CI 91.0 to 98.2%). CONCLUSION: PoCUS combined with the OAR has a good diagnostic value in usual clinical practice in the assessment of suspected ankle and fifth metatarsal bone fractures compared to radiographic imaging. More experience with PoCUS will improve the diagnostic value. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registered in the local Research Register, study number 201500597. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7204241 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72042412020-05-12 Point-of-care bedside ultrasound examination for the exclusion of clinically significant ankle and fifth metatarsal bone fractures; a single blinded prospective diagnostic cohort study Crombach, Aniek Azizi, Nasim Lameijer, Heleen El Moumni, Mostafa ter Maaten, Jan C. J Foot Ankle Res Research OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the diagnostic value of point-of-care bedside ultrasound (PoCUS) as in usual clinical practice in suspected ankle and fifth metatarsal bone fractures, compared to the standard of radiographic imaging. METHODS: This prospective study included patients ≥17 years presenting to the Emergency Department with ankle trauma and positive Ottawa Ankle Rules. All patients underwent PoCUS of the ankle by a (resident) emergency physician, the images were assessed by an ultrasound expert. Both were blinded for the medical history and clinical findings of the patients. Radiography of the ankle followed, evaluated by a radiologist blinded from the PoCUS findings. Primary outcome measures were sensitivity and specificity of PoCUS. RESULTS: A total of 242 patients were included, with 35 (22%) clinically significant (non-avulsion) fractures observed with radiography. The sensitivity of PoCUS in detecting clinically significant fractures by all sonographers was 80.0% (95% Confidence Interval (CI) 63.0 to 91.6%), specificity 90.3% (95% CI 83.7 to 94.9%), positive predictive value 70.0% (95% CI 57.0 to 80.3%) and the negative predictive value 94.1% (95% CI 89.1 to 96.9%). The sensitivity of PoCUS in detecting clinically significant fractures by the expert was 82.8% (95% CI 66.3 to 93.4%), specificity 99.2% (95% CI 95.5 to 99.9%), positive predictive value 96.7% (95% CI 80.3 to 99.5%) and the negative predictive value 95.3% (95% CI 91.0 to 98.2%). CONCLUSION: PoCUS combined with the OAR has a good diagnostic value in usual clinical practice in the assessment of suspected ankle and fifth metatarsal bone fractures compared to radiographic imaging. More experience with PoCUS will improve the diagnostic value. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registered in the local Research Register, study number 201500597. BioMed Central 2020-05-07 /pmc/articles/PMC7204241/ /pubmed/32381048 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13047-020-00387-y Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Crombach, Aniek Azizi, Nasim Lameijer, Heleen El Moumni, Mostafa ter Maaten, Jan C. Point-of-care bedside ultrasound examination for the exclusion of clinically significant ankle and fifth metatarsal bone fractures; a single blinded prospective diagnostic cohort study |
title | Point-of-care bedside ultrasound examination for the exclusion of clinically significant ankle and fifth metatarsal bone fractures; a single blinded prospective diagnostic cohort study |
title_full | Point-of-care bedside ultrasound examination for the exclusion of clinically significant ankle and fifth metatarsal bone fractures; a single blinded prospective diagnostic cohort study |
title_fullStr | Point-of-care bedside ultrasound examination for the exclusion of clinically significant ankle and fifth metatarsal bone fractures; a single blinded prospective diagnostic cohort study |
title_full_unstemmed | Point-of-care bedside ultrasound examination for the exclusion of clinically significant ankle and fifth metatarsal bone fractures; a single blinded prospective diagnostic cohort study |
title_short | Point-of-care bedside ultrasound examination for the exclusion of clinically significant ankle and fifth metatarsal bone fractures; a single blinded prospective diagnostic cohort study |
title_sort | point-of-care bedside ultrasound examination for the exclusion of clinically significant ankle and fifth metatarsal bone fractures; a single blinded prospective diagnostic cohort study |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7204241/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32381048 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13047-020-00387-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT crombachaniek pointofcarebedsideultrasoundexaminationfortheexclusionofclinicallysignificantankleandfifthmetatarsalbonefracturesasingleblindedprospectivediagnosticcohortstudy AT azizinasim pointofcarebedsideultrasoundexaminationfortheexclusionofclinicallysignificantankleandfifthmetatarsalbonefracturesasingleblindedprospectivediagnosticcohortstudy AT lameijerheleen pointofcarebedsideultrasoundexaminationfortheexclusionofclinicallysignificantankleandfifthmetatarsalbonefracturesasingleblindedprospectivediagnosticcohortstudy AT elmoumnimostafa pointofcarebedsideultrasoundexaminationfortheexclusionofclinicallysignificantankleandfifthmetatarsalbonefracturesasingleblindedprospectivediagnosticcohortstudy AT termaatenjanc pointofcarebedsideultrasoundexaminationfortheexclusionofclinicallysignificantankleandfifthmetatarsalbonefracturesasingleblindedprospectivediagnosticcohortstudy |