Cargando…

Point-of-care bedside ultrasound examination for the exclusion of clinically significant ankle and fifth metatarsal bone fractures; a single blinded prospective diagnostic cohort study

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the diagnostic value of point-of-care bedside ultrasound (PoCUS) as in usual clinical practice in suspected ankle and fifth metatarsal bone fractures, compared to the standard of radiographic imaging. METHODS: This prospective study included patients ≥1...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Crombach, Aniek, Azizi, Nasim, Lameijer, Heleen, El Moumni, Mostafa, ter Maaten, Jan C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7204241/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32381048
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13047-020-00387-y
_version_ 1783530024804024320
author Crombach, Aniek
Azizi, Nasim
Lameijer, Heleen
El Moumni, Mostafa
ter Maaten, Jan C.
author_facet Crombach, Aniek
Azizi, Nasim
Lameijer, Heleen
El Moumni, Mostafa
ter Maaten, Jan C.
author_sort Crombach, Aniek
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the diagnostic value of point-of-care bedside ultrasound (PoCUS) as in usual clinical practice in suspected ankle and fifth metatarsal bone fractures, compared to the standard of radiographic imaging. METHODS: This prospective study included patients ≥17 years presenting to the Emergency Department with ankle trauma and positive Ottawa Ankle Rules. All patients underwent PoCUS of the ankle by a (resident) emergency physician, the images were assessed by an ultrasound expert. Both were blinded for the medical history and clinical findings of the patients. Radiography of the ankle followed, evaluated by a radiologist blinded from the PoCUS findings. Primary outcome measures were sensitivity and specificity of PoCUS. RESULTS: A total of 242 patients were included, with 35 (22%) clinically significant (non-avulsion) fractures observed with radiography. The sensitivity of PoCUS in detecting clinically significant fractures by all sonographers was 80.0% (95% Confidence Interval (CI) 63.0 to 91.6%), specificity 90.3% (95% CI 83.7 to 94.9%), positive predictive value 70.0% (95% CI 57.0 to 80.3%) and the negative predictive value 94.1% (95% CI 89.1 to 96.9%). The sensitivity of PoCUS in detecting clinically significant fractures by the expert was 82.8% (95% CI 66.3 to 93.4%), specificity 99.2% (95% CI 95.5 to 99.9%), positive predictive value 96.7% (95% CI 80.3 to 99.5%) and the negative predictive value 95.3% (95% CI 91.0 to 98.2%). CONCLUSION: PoCUS combined with the OAR has a good diagnostic value in usual clinical practice in the assessment of suspected ankle and fifth metatarsal bone fractures compared to radiographic imaging. More experience with PoCUS will improve the diagnostic value. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registered in the local Research Register, study number 201500597.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7204241
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72042412020-05-12 Point-of-care bedside ultrasound examination for the exclusion of clinically significant ankle and fifth metatarsal bone fractures; a single blinded prospective diagnostic cohort study Crombach, Aniek Azizi, Nasim Lameijer, Heleen El Moumni, Mostafa ter Maaten, Jan C. J Foot Ankle Res Research OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the diagnostic value of point-of-care bedside ultrasound (PoCUS) as in usual clinical practice in suspected ankle and fifth metatarsal bone fractures, compared to the standard of radiographic imaging. METHODS: This prospective study included patients ≥17 years presenting to the Emergency Department with ankle trauma and positive Ottawa Ankle Rules. All patients underwent PoCUS of the ankle by a (resident) emergency physician, the images were assessed by an ultrasound expert. Both were blinded for the medical history and clinical findings of the patients. Radiography of the ankle followed, evaluated by a radiologist blinded from the PoCUS findings. Primary outcome measures were sensitivity and specificity of PoCUS. RESULTS: A total of 242 patients were included, with 35 (22%) clinically significant (non-avulsion) fractures observed with radiography. The sensitivity of PoCUS in detecting clinically significant fractures by all sonographers was 80.0% (95% Confidence Interval (CI) 63.0 to 91.6%), specificity 90.3% (95% CI 83.7 to 94.9%), positive predictive value 70.0% (95% CI 57.0 to 80.3%) and the negative predictive value 94.1% (95% CI 89.1 to 96.9%). The sensitivity of PoCUS in detecting clinically significant fractures by the expert was 82.8% (95% CI 66.3 to 93.4%), specificity 99.2% (95% CI 95.5 to 99.9%), positive predictive value 96.7% (95% CI 80.3 to 99.5%) and the negative predictive value 95.3% (95% CI 91.0 to 98.2%). CONCLUSION: PoCUS combined with the OAR has a good diagnostic value in usual clinical practice in the assessment of suspected ankle and fifth metatarsal bone fractures compared to radiographic imaging. More experience with PoCUS will improve the diagnostic value. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registered in the local Research Register, study number 201500597. BioMed Central 2020-05-07 /pmc/articles/PMC7204241/ /pubmed/32381048 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13047-020-00387-y Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Crombach, Aniek
Azizi, Nasim
Lameijer, Heleen
El Moumni, Mostafa
ter Maaten, Jan C.
Point-of-care bedside ultrasound examination for the exclusion of clinically significant ankle and fifth metatarsal bone fractures; a single blinded prospective diagnostic cohort study
title Point-of-care bedside ultrasound examination for the exclusion of clinically significant ankle and fifth metatarsal bone fractures; a single blinded prospective diagnostic cohort study
title_full Point-of-care bedside ultrasound examination for the exclusion of clinically significant ankle and fifth metatarsal bone fractures; a single blinded prospective diagnostic cohort study
title_fullStr Point-of-care bedside ultrasound examination for the exclusion of clinically significant ankle and fifth metatarsal bone fractures; a single blinded prospective diagnostic cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Point-of-care bedside ultrasound examination for the exclusion of clinically significant ankle and fifth metatarsal bone fractures; a single blinded prospective diagnostic cohort study
title_short Point-of-care bedside ultrasound examination for the exclusion of clinically significant ankle and fifth metatarsal bone fractures; a single blinded prospective diagnostic cohort study
title_sort point-of-care bedside ultrasound examination for the exclusion of clinically significant ankle and fifth metatarsal bone fractures; a single blinded prospective diagnostic cohort study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7204241/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32381048
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13047-020-00387-y
work_keys_str_mv AT crombachaniek pointofcarebedsideultrasoundexaminationfortheexclusionofclinicallysignificantankleandfifthmetatarsalbonefracturesasingleblindedprospectivediagnosticcohortstudy
AT azizinasim pointofcarebedsideultrasoundexaminationfortheexclusionofclinicallysignificantankleandfifthmetatarsalbonefracturesasingleblindedprospectivediagnosticcohortstudy
AT lameijerheleen pointofcarebedsideultrasoundexaminationfortheexclusionofclinicallysignificantankleandfifthmetatarsalbonefracturesasingleblindedprospectivediagnosticcohortstudy
AT elmoumnimostafa pointofcarebedsideultrasoundexaminationfortheexclusionofclinicallysignificantankleandfifthmetatarsalbonefracturesasingleblindedprospectivediagnosticcohortstudy
AT termaatenjanc pointofcarebedsideultrasoundexaminationfortheexclusionofclinicallysignificantankleandfifthmetatarsalbonefracturesasingleblindedprospectivediagnosticcohortstudy