Cargando…
SAFE: an eHealth intervention for women experiencing intimate partner violence – study protocol for a randomized controlled trial, process evaluation and open feasibility study
BACKGROUND: Intimate partner violence (IPV) affects almost one in three women worldwide. However, disclosing violence or seeking help is difficult for affected women. eHealth may represent an effective alternative to the standard support offers, which often require face-to-face interaction, because...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7204286/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32380972 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-08743-0 |
_version_ | 1783530032985014272 |
---|---|
author | van Gelder, N. E. van Rosmalen-Nooijens, K. A. W. L. A Ligthart, S. Prins, J. B. Oertelt-Prigione, S. Lagro-Janssen, A. L. M. |
author_facet | van Gelder, N. E. van Rosmalen-Nooijens, K. A. W. L. A Ligthart, S. Prins, J. B. Oertelt-Prigione, S. Lagro-Janssen, A. L. M. |
author_sort | van Gelder, N. E. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Intimate partner violence (IPV) affects almost one in three women worldwide. However, disclosing violence or seeking help is difficult for affected women. eHealth may represent an effective alternative to the standard support offers, which often require face-to-face interaction, because of easy accessibility and possibility of anonymous usage. In the Netherlands we are developing SAFE, an eHealth intervention for female victims of IPV, which will be evaluated in a randomized controlled trial and a process evaluation, followed by an open feasibility study to assess real-world user data. METHODS/DESIGN: The randomized controlled trial is a two-arm parallel design comparing an intervention arm and a control group. The groups both have access to eHealth but differ in the offer of interactive features compared to static information. Both groups complete questionnaires at three or four time points (baseline, three months, six months, 12 months) with self-efficacy at 6 months as the primary outcome, measured with the General Self-Efficacy (GSE) scale. The process evaluation consists of quantitative data (from the website and from web evaluation questionnaires) and qualitative data (from interviews) on how the website was used and the users’ experiences. DISCUSSION: eHealth has the potential to reach a large number of women who experience IPV. The internet-based design can lower access barriers and encourage help-seeking behavior ultimately reducing the lag time between subjective awareness and protective action. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Trial registered on 15 August 2017 at the Netherlands Trial Register NL7108 (NTR7313). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7204286 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72042862020-05-14 SAFE: an eHealth intervention for women experiencing intimate partner violence – study protocol for a randomized controlled trial, process evaluation and open feasibility study van Gelder, N. E. van Rosmalen-Nooijens, K. A. W. L. A Ligthart, S. Prins, J. B. Oertelt-Prigione, S. Lagro-Janssen, A. L. M. BMC Public Health Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Intimate partner violence (IPV) affects almost one in three women worldwide. However, disclosing violence or seeking help is difficult for affected women. eHealth may represent an effective alternative to the standard support offers, which often require face-to-face interaction, because of easy accessibility and possibility of anonymous usage. In the Netherlands we are developing SAFE, an eHealth intervention for female victims of IPV, which will be evaluated in a randomized controlled trial and a process evaluation, followed by an open feasibility study to assess real-world user data. METHODS/DESIGN: The randomized controlled trial is a two-arm parallel design comparing an intervention arm and a control group. The groups both have access to eHealth but differ in the offer of interactive features compared to static information. Both groups complete questionnaires at three or four time points (baseline, three months, six months, 12 months) with self-efficacy at 6 months as the primary outcome, measured with the General Self-Efficacy (GSE) scale. The process evaluation consists of quantitative data (from the website and from web evaluation questionnaires) and qualitative data (from interviews) on how the website was used and the users’ experiences. DISCUSSION: eHealth has the potential to reach a large number of women who experience IPV. The internet-based design can lower access barriers and encourage help-seeking behavior ultimately reducing the lag time between subjective awareness and protective action. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Trial registered on 15 August 2017 at the Netherlands Trial Register NL7108 (NTR7313). BioMed Central 2020-05-07 /pmc/articles/PMC7204286/ /pubmed/32380972 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-08743-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol van Gelder, N. E. van Rosmalen-Nooijens, K. A. W. L. A Ligthart, S. Prins, J. B. Oertelt-Prigione, S. Lagro-Janssen, A. L. M. SAFE: an eHealth intervention for women experiencing intimate partner violence – study protocol for a randomized controlled trial, process evaluation and open feasibility study |
title | SAFE: an eHealth intervention for women experiencing intimate partner violence – study protocol for a randomized controlled trial, process evaluation and open feasibility study |
title_full | SAFE: an eHealth intervention for women experiencing intimate partner violence – study protocol for a randomized controlled trial, process evaluation and open feasibility study |
title_fullStr | SAFE: an eHealth intervention for women experiencing intimate partner violence – study protocol for a randomized controlled trial, process evaluation and open feasibility study |
title_full_unstemmed | SAFE: an eHealth intervention for women experiencing intimate partner violence – study protocol for a randomized controlled trial, process evaluation and open feasibility study |
title_short | SAFE: an eHealth intervention for women experiencing intimate partner violence – study protocol for a randomized controlled trial, process evaluation and open feasibility study |
title_sort | safe: an ehealth intervention for women experiencing intimate partner violence – study protocol for a randomized controlled trial, process evaluation and open feasibility study |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7204286/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32380972 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-08743-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vangelderne safeanehealthinterventionforwomenexperiencingintimatepartnerviolencestudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrialprocessevaluationandopenfeasibilitystudy AT vanrosmalennooijenskawl safeanehealthinterventionforwomenexperiencingintimatepartnerviolencestudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrialprocessevaluationandopenfeasibilitystudy AT aligtharts safeanehealthinterventionforwomenexperiencingintimatepartnerviolencestudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrialprocessevaluationandopenfeasibilitystudy AT prinsjb safeanehealthinterventionforwomenexperiencingintimatepartnerviolencestudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrialprocessevaluationandopenfeasibilitystudy AT oerteltprigiones safeanehealthinterventionforwomenexperiencingintimatepartnerviolencestudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrialprocessevaluationandopenfeasibilitystudy AT lagrojanssenalm safeanehealthinterventionforwomenexperiencingintimatepartnerviolencestudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrialprocessevaluationandopenfeasibilitystudy |