Cargando…

The efficacy and safety of induction chemotherapy combined with concurrent chemoradiotherapy versus concurrent chemoradiotherapy alone in nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Induction chemotherapy (IC) combined with concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) has been recommended as the first-line therapy for locoregional nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). Due to the different chemotherapeutic drugs used in the IC and CCRT, the results remain controversial. METHODS: Pu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Bi-Cheng, Xiao, Bo-Ya, Lin, Guo-He, Wang, Chang, Liu, Quentin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7204295/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32375701
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-020-06912-3
_version_ 1783530035135643648
author Wang, Bi-Cheng
Xiao, Bo-Ya
Lin, Guo-He
Wang, Chang
Liu, Quentin
author_facet Wang, Bi-Cheng
Xiao, Bo-Ya
Lin, Guo-He
Wang, Chang
Liu, Quentin
author_sort Wang, Bi-Cheng
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Induction chemotherapy (IC) combined with concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) has been recommended as the first-line therapy for locoregional nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). Due to the different chemotherapeutic drugs used in the IC and CCRT, the results remain controversial. METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases were systematically retrieved to search potentially eligible clinical trials up to Sep 11, 2019. Eligible studies were registered and prospective randomized controlled clinical trials. RESULTS: From 526 records, nine articles including seven randomized controlled clinical trials were eligible, with a total of 2311 locoregional advanced NPC patients. IC + CCRT had significantly lower risks of death (3-year hazard ratio [HR]: 0.70, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.55–0.89, p = 0.003; 5-year HR: 0.77, 95% CI 0.62–0.94, p = 0.01), disease progression (3-year HR: 0.67, 95% CI 0.55–0.80, p < 0.001; 5-year HR: 0.70, 95% CI 0.58–0.83, p < 0.0001), distant metastasis (3-year HR: 0.58, 95% CI 0.45–0.74, p < 0.0001; 5-year HR: 0.69, 95% CI 0.55–0.87, p = 0.001) and locoregional relapse (3-year HR: 0.69, 95% CI 0.50–0.95, p = 0.02; 5-year HR: 0.66, 95% CI 0.51–0.86, p = 0.002) than CCRT. Compared with CCRT, IC + CCRT showed higher relative risks of grade 3 or more neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, nausea, vomiting and hepatotoxicity throughout the course of treatment, and higher relative risks of grade ≥ 3 thrombocytopenia and vomiting during CCRT. CONCLUSION: IC combined with CCRT significantly improved the survival in locoregional advanced NPC patients. Moreover, toxicities were well tolerated during IC and CCRT. Further clinical trials are warranted to confirm the optimal induction chemotherapeutic regimen in the future.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7204295
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72042952020-05-14 The efficacy and safety of induction chemotherapy combined with concurrent chemoradiotherapy versus concurrent chemoradiotherapy alone in nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis Wang, Bi-Cheng Xiao, Bo-Ya Lin, Guo-He Wang, Chang Liu, Quentin BMC Cancer Research Article BACKGROUND: Induction chemotherapy (IC) combined with concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) has been recommended as the first-line therapy for locoregional nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). Due to the different chemotherapeutic drugs used in the IC and CCRT, the results remain controversial. METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases were systematically retrieved to search potentially eligible clinical trials up to Sep 11, 2019. Eligible studies were registered and prospective randomized controlled clinical trials. RESULTS: From 526 records, nine articles including seven randomized controlled clinical trials were eligible, with a total of 2311 locoregional advanced NPC patients. IC + CCRT had significantly lower risks of death (3-year hazard ratio [HR]: 0.70, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.55–0.89, p = 0.003; 5-year HR: 0.77, 95% CI 0.62–0.94, p = 0.01), disease progression (3-year HR: 0.67, 95% CI 0.55–0.80, p < 0.001; 5-year HR: 0.70, 95% CI 0.58–0.83, p < 0.0001), distant metastasis (3-year HR: 0.58, 95% CI 0.45–0.74, p < 0.0001; 5-year HR: 0.69, 95% CI 0.55–0.87, p = 0.001) and locoregional relapse (3-year HR: 0.69, 95% CI 0.50–0.95, p = 0.02; 5-year HR: 0.66, 95% CI 0.51–0.86, p = 0.002) than CCRT. Compared with CCRT, IC + CCRT showed higher relative risks of grade 3 or more neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, nausea, vomiting and hepatotoxicity throughout the course of treatment, and higher relative risks of grade ≥ 3 thrombocytopenia and vomiting during CCRT. CONCLUSION: IC combined with CCRT significantly improved the survival in locoregional advanced NPC patients. Moreover, toxicities were well tolerated during IC and CCRT. Further clinical trials are warranted to confirm the optimal induction chemotherapeutic regimen in the future. BioMed Central 2020-05-06 /pmc/articles/PMC7204295/ /pubmed/32375701 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-020-06912-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Wang, Bi-Cheng
Xiao, Bo-Ya
Lin, Guo-He
Wang, Chang
Liu, Quentin
The efficacy and safety of induction chemotherapy combined with concurrent chemoradiotherapy versus concurrent chemoradiotherapy alone in nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title The efficacy and safety of induction chemotherapy combined with concurrent chemoradiotherapy versus concurrent chemoradiotherapy alone in nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full The efficacy and safety of induction chemotherapy combined with concurrent chemoradiotherapy versus concurrent chemoradiotherapy alone in nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr The efficacy and safety of induction chemotherapy combined with concurrent chemoradiotherapy versus concurrent chemoradiotherapy alone in nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed The efficacy and safety of induction chemotherapy combined with concurrent chemoradiotherapy versus concurrent chemoradiotherapy alone in nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short The efficacy and safety of induction chemotherapy combined with concurrent chemoradiotherapy versus concurrent chemoradiotherapy alone in nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort efficacy and safety of induction chemotherapy combined with concurrent chemoradiotherapy versus concurrent chemoradiotherapy alone in nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7204295/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32375701
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-020-06912-3
work_keys_str_mv AT wangbicheng theefficacyandsafetyofinductionchemotherapycombinedwithconcurrentchemoradiotherapyversusconcurrentchemoradiotherapyaloneinnasopharyngealcarcinomapatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT xiaoboya theefficacyandsafetyofinductionchemotherapycombinedwithconcurrentchemoradiotherapyversusconcurrentchemoradiotherapyaloneinnasopharyngealcarcinomapatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT linguohe theefficacyandsafetyofinductionchemotherapycombinedwithconcurrentchemoradiotherapyversusconcurrentchemoradiotherapyaloneinnasopharyngealcarcinomapatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT wangchang theefficacyandsafetyofinductionchemotherapycombinedwithconcurrentchemoradiotherapyversusconcurrentchemoradiotherapyaloneinnasopharyngealcarcinomapatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT liuquentin theefficacyandsafetyofinductionchemotherapycombinedwithconcurrentchemoradiotherapyversusconcurrentchemoradiotherapyaloneinnasopharyngealcarcinomapatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT wangbicheng efficacyandsafetyofinductionchemotherapycombinedwithconcurrentchemoradiotherapyversusconcurrentchemoradiotherapyaloneinnasopharyngealcarcinomapatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT xiaoboya efficacyandsafetyofinductionchemotherapycombinedwithconcurrentchemoradiotherapyversusconcurrentchemoradiotherapyaloneinnasopharyngealcarcinomapatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT linguohe efficacyandsafetyofinductionchemotherapycombinedwithconcurrentchemoradiotherapyversusconcurrentchemoradiotherapyaloneinnasopharyngealcarcinomapatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT wangchang efficacyandsafetyofinductionchemotherapycombinedwithconcurrentchemoradiotherapyversusconcurrentchemoradiotherapyaloneinnasopharyngealcarcinomapatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT liuquentin efficacyandsafetyofinductionchemotherapycombinedwithconcurrentchemoradiotherapyversusconcurrentchemoradiotherapyaloneinnasopharyngealcarcinomapatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis