Cargando…
The efficacy and safety of induction chemotherapy combined with concurrent chemoradiotherapy versus concurrent chemoradiotherapy alone in nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
BACKGROUND: Induction chemotherapy (IC) combined with concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) has been recommended as the first-line therapy for locoregional nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). Due to the different chemotherapeutic drugs used in the IC and CCRT, the results remain controversial. METHODS: Pu...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7204295/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32375701 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-020-06912-3 |
_version_ | 1783530035135643648 |
---|---|
author | Wang, Bi-Cheng Xiao, Bo-Ya Lin, Guo-He Wang, Chang Liu, Quentin |
author_facet | Wang, Bi-Cheng Xiao, Bo-Ya Lin, Guo-He Wang, Chang Liu, Quentin |
author_sort | Wang, Bi-Cheng |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Induction chemotherapy (IC) combined with concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) has been recommended as the first-line therapy for locoregional nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). Due to the different chemotherapeutic drugs used in the IC and CCRT, the results remain controversial. METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases were systematically retrieved to search potentially eligible clinical trials up to Sep 11, 2019. Eligible studies were registered and prospective randomized controlled clinical trials. RESULTS: From 526 records, nine articles including seven randomized controlled clinical trials were eligible, with a total of 2311 locoregional advanced NPC patients. IC + CCRT had significantly lower risks of death (3-year hazard ratio [HR]: 0.70, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.55–0.89, p = 0.003; 5-year HR: 0.77, 95% CI 0.62–0.94, p = 0.01), disease progression (3-year HR: 0.67, 95% CI 0.55–0.80, p < 0.001; 5-year HR: 0.70, 95% CI 0.58–0.83, p < 0.0001), distant metastasis (3-year HR: 0.58, 95% CI 0.45–0.74, p < 0.0001; 5-year HR: 0.69, 95% CI 0.55–0.87, p = 0.001) and locoregional relapse (3-year HR: 0.69, 95% CI 0.50–0.95, p = 0.02; 5-year HR: 0.66, 95% CI 0.51–0.86, p = 0.002) than CCRT. Compared with CCRT, IC + CCRT showed higher relative risks of grade 3 or more neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, nausea, vomiting and hepatotoxicity throughout the course of treatment, and higher relative risks of grade ≥ 3 thrombocytopenia and vomiting during CCRT. CONCLUSION: IC combined with CCRT significantly improved the survival in locoregional advanced NPC patients. Moreover, toxicities were well tolerated during IC and CCRT. Further clinical trials are warranted to confirm the optimal induction chemotherapeutic regimen in the future. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7204295 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72042952020-05-14 The efficacy and safety of induction chemotherapy combined with concurrent chemoradiotherapy versus concurrent chemoradiotherapy alone in nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis Wang, Bi-Cheng Xiao, Bo-Ya Lin, Guo-He Wang, Chang Liu, Quentin BMC Cancer Research Article BACKGROUND: Induction chemotherapy (IC) combined with concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) has been recommended as the first-line therapy for locoregional nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). Due to the different chemotherapeutic drugs used in the IC and CCRT, the results remain controversial. METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases were systematically retrieved to search potentially eligible clinical trials up to Sep 11, 2019. Eligible studies were registered and prospective randomized controlled clinical trials. RESULTS: From 526 records, nine articles including seven randomized controlled clinical trials were eligible, with a total of 2311 locoregional advanced NPC patients. IC + CCRT had significantly lower risks of death (3-year hazard ratio [HR]: 0.70, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.55–0.89, p = 0.003; 5-year HR: 0.77, 95% CI 0.62–0.94, p = 0.01), disease progression (3-year HR: 0.67, 95% CI 0.55–0.80, p < 0.001; 5-year HR: 0.70, 95% CI 0.58–0.83, p < 0.0001), distant metastasis (3-year HR: 0.58, 95% CI 0.45–0.74, p < 0.0001; 5-year HR: 0.69, 95% CI 0.55–0.87, p = 0.001) and locoregional relapse (3-year HR: 0.69, 95% CI 0.50–0.95, p = 0.02; 5-year HR: 0.66, 95% CI 0.51–0.86, p = 0.002) than CCRT. Compared with CCRT, IC + CCRT showed higher relative risks of grade 3 or more neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, nausea, vomiting and hepatotoxicity throughout the course of treatment, and higher relative risks of grade ≥ 3 thrombocytopenia and vomiting during CCRT. CONCLUSION: IC combined with CCRT significantly improved the survival in locoregional advanced NPC patients. Moreover, toxicities were well tolerated during IC and CCRT. Further clinical trials are warranted to confirm the optimal induction chemotherapeutic regimen in the future. BioMed Central 2020-05-06 /pmc/articles/PMC7204295/ /pubmed/32375701 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-020-06912-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Wang, Bi-Cheng Xiao, Bo-Ya Lin, Guo-He Wang, Chang Liu, Quentin The efficacy and safety of induction chemotherapy combined with concurrent chemoradiotherapy versus concurrent chemoradiotherapy alone in nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title | The efficacy and safety of induction chemotherapy combined with concurrent chemoradiotherapy versus concurrent chemoradiotherapy alone in nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full | The efficacy and safety of induction chemotherapy combined with concurrent chemoradiotherapy versus concurrent chemoradiotherapy alone in nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | The efficacy and safety of induction chemotherapy combined with concurrent chemoradiotherapy versus concurrent chemoradiotherapy alone in nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | The efficacy and safety of induction chemotherapy combined with concurrent chemoradiotherapy versus concurrent chemoradiotherapy alone in nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short | The efficacy and safety of induction chemotherapy combined with concurrent chemoradiotherapy versus concurrent chemoradiotherapy alone in nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | efficacy and safety of induction chemotherapy combined with concurrent chemoradiotherapy versus concurrent chemoradiotherapy alone in nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7204295/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32375701 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-020-06912-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wangbicheng theefficacyandsafetyofinductionchemotherapycombinedwithconcurrentchemoradiotherapyversusconcurrentchemoradiotherapyaloneinnasopharyngealcarcinomapatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT xiaoboya theefficacyandsafetyofinductionchemotherapycombinedwithconcurrentchemoradiotherapyversusconcurrentchemoradiotherapyaloneinnasopharyngealcarcinomapatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT linguohe theefficacyandsafetyofinductionchemotherapycombinedwithconcurrentchemoradiotherapyversusconcurrentchemoradiotherapyaloneinnasopharyngealcarcinomapatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT wangchang theefficacyandsafetyofinductionchemotherapycombinedwithconcurrentchemoradiotherapyversusconcurrentchemoradiotherapyaloneinnasopharyngealcarcinomapatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT liuquentin theefficacyandsafetyofinductionchemotherapycombinedwithconcurrentchemoradiotherapyversusconcurrentchemoradiotherapyaloneinnasopharyngealcarcinomapatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT wangbicheng efficacyandsafetyofinductionchemotherapycombinedwithconcurrentchemoradiotherapyversusconcurrentchemoradiotherapyaloneinnasopharyngealcarcinomapatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT xiaoboya efficacyandsafetyofinductionchemotherapycombinedwithconcurrentchemoradiotherapyversusconcurrentchemoradiotherapyaloneinnasopharyngealcarcinomapatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT linguohe efficacyandsafetyofinductionchemotherapycombinedwithconcurrentchemoradiotherapyversusconcurrentchemoradiotherapyaloneinnasopharyngealcarcinomapatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT wangchang efficacyandsafetyofinductionchemotherapycombinedwithconcurrentchemoradiotherapyversusconcurrentchemoradiotherapyaloneinnasopharyngealcarcinomapatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT liuquentin efficacyandsafetyofinductionchemotherapycombinedwithconcurrentchemoradiotherapyversusconcurrentchemoradiotherapyaloneinnasopharyngealcarcinomapatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |