Cargando…
Visual rehabilitation of patients with corneal diseases
BACKGROUND: Although most patients with visual impairment due to corneal diseases can be treated successfully with surgery, some require visual rehabilitation to restore reading ability. To evaluate the best LVAs especially in terms of reading speed and characterize this specific patient group we pe...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7204299/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32375800 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-020-01436-7 |
_version_ | 1783530036086702080 |
---|---|
author | Oeverhaus, Michael Dekowski, Dirk Hirche, Herbert Esser, Joachim Schaperdoth-Gerlings, Barbara Eckstein, Anja |
author_facet | Oeverhaus, Michael Dekowski, Dirk Hirche, Herbert Esser, Joachim Schaperdoth-Gerlings, Barbara Eckstein, Anja |
author_sort | Oeverhaus, Michael |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Although most patients with visual impairment due to corneal diseases can be treated successfully with surgery, some require visual rehabilitation to restore reading ability. To evaluate the best LVAs especially in terms of reading speed and characterize this specific patient group we performed a prospective, randomized cross-over trial. METHODS: All 34 patients underwent a detailed examination (slit-lamp, funduscopy, SD-OCT, ETDRS) as screening. Only patients with corneal diseases without other ocular diseases were included. Reading-speed was assessed with International-Reading-Speed-Texts (IReST) consecutively with five different LVAs (low vision aids) during one day in a randomized cross-over design. Corneal haze was quantified with corneal densitometry (Pentacam). RESULTS: Patients were either visually impaired (n = 28), severely impaired (n = 4) or legally blind (n = 2). Patients read significantly faster with LVAs (p < 0.0001). Fastest reading speed could be achieved with video magnifier (CCTV). Optical magnifier and portable-electronic magnifier enabled significantly lower reading speeds (p < 0.01). In a subgroup of patients (VA < 3/60,n = 6) black background enabled patients to read significantly faster compared to white background (p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: Patients with low magnification requirement can be treated successfully with optical LVAs and portable-electronic magnifiers. More severely afflicted patients need a CCTV. Black background enables fastest reading-speeds, probably due to less blinding. Visual impairment can be estimated with corneal densitometry. Our trial confirms the capability of LVAs to successfully restore the reading ability in patients with corneal diseases, which is a crucial part of visual rehabilitation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial was registered at the German Clinical Trials Register as DRKS00010887 at 09.08.2016. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7204299 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72042992020-05-14 Visual rehabilitation of patients with corneal diseases Oeverhaus, Michael Dekowski, Dirk Hirche, Herbert Esser, Joachim Schaperdoth-Gerlings, Barbara Eckstein, Anja BMC Ophthalmol Research Article BACKGROUND: Although most patients with visual impairment due to corneal diseases can be treated successfully with surgery, some require visual rehabilitation to restore reading ability. To evaluate the best LVAs especially in terms of reading speed and characterize this specific patient group we performed a prospective, randomized cross-over trial. METHODS: All 34 patients underwent a detailed examination (slit-lamp, funduscopy, SD-OCT, ETDRS) as screening. Only patients with corneal diseases without other ocular diseases were included. Reading-speed was assessed with International-Reading-Speed-Texts (IReST) consecutively with five different LVAs (low vision aids) during one day in a randomized cross-over design. Corneal haze was quantified with corneal densitometry (Pentacam). RESULTS: Patients were either visually impaired (n = 28), severely impaired (n = 4) or legally blind (n = 2). Patients read significantly faster with LVAs (p < 0.0001). Fastest reading speed could be achieved with video magnifier (CCTV). Optical magnifier and portable-electronic magnifier enabled significantly lower reading speeds (p < 0.01). In a subgroup of patients (VA < 3/60,n = 6) black background enabled patients to read significantly faster compared to white background (p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: Patients with low magnification requirement can be treated successfully with optical LVAs and portable-electronic magnifiers. More severely afflicted patients need a CCTV. Black background enables fastest reading-speeds, probably due to less blinding. Visual impairment can be estimated with corneal densitometry. Our trial confirms the capability of LVAs to successfully restore the reading ability in patients with corneal diseases, which is a crucial part of visual rehabilitation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial was registered at the German Clinical Trials Register as DRKS00010887 at 09.08.2016. BioMed Central 2020-05-06 /pmc/articles/PMC7204299/ /pubmed/32375800 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-020-01436-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Oeverhaus, Michael Dekowski, Dirk Hirche, Herbert Esser, Joachim Schaperdoth-Gerlings, Barbara Eckstein, Anja Visual rehabilitation of patients with corneal diseases |
title | Visual rehabilitation of patients with corneal diseases |
title_full | Visual rehabilitation of patients with corneal diseases |
title_fullStr | Visual rehabilitation of patients with corneal diseases |
title_full_unstemmed | Visual rehabilitation of patients with corneal diseases |
title_short | Visual rehabilitation of patients with corneal diseases |
title_sort | visual rehabilitation of patients with corneal diseases |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7204299/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32375800 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-020-01436-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT oeverhausmichael visualrehabilitationofpatientswithcornealdiseases AT dekowskidirk visualrehabilitationofpatientswithcornealdiseases AT hircheherbert visualrehabilitationofpatientswithcornealdiseases AT esserjoachim visualrehabilitationofpatientswithcornealdiseases AT schaperdothgerlingsbarbara visualrehabilitationofpatientswithcornealdiseases AT ecksteinanja visualrehabilitationofpatientswithcornealdiseases |