Cargando…

Baseline-adjusted proportional odds models for the quantification of treatment effects in trials with ordinal sum score outcomes

BACKGROUND: Sum scores of ordinal outcomes are common in randomized clinical trials. The approaches routinely employed for assessing treatment effects, such as t-tests or Wilcoxon tests, are not particularly powerful in detecting changes in relevant parameters or lack the ability to incorporate base...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Buri, Muriel, Curt, Armin, Steeves, John, Hothorn, Torsten
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7204322/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32375705
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-020-00984-2
_version_ 1783530041506791424
author Buri, Muriel
Curt, Armin
Steeves, John
Hothorn, Torsten
author_facet Buri, Muriel
Curt, Armin
Steeves, John
Hothorn, Torsten
author_sort Buri, Muriel
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Sum scores of ordinal outcomes are common in randomized clinical trials. The approaches routinely employed for assessing treatment effects, such as t-tests or Wilcoxon tests, are not particularly powerful in detecting changes in relevant parameters or lack the ability to incorporate baseline information. Hence, tailored statistical methods are needed for the analysis of ordinal outcomes in clinical research. METHODS: We propose baseline-adjusted proportional odds logistic regression models to overcome previous limitations in the analysis of ordinal outcomes in randomized clinical trials. For the validation of our method, we focus on common ordinal sum score outcomes of neurological clinical trials such as the upper extremity motor score, the spinal cord independence measure, and the self-care subscore of the latter. We compare the statistical power of our models to other conventional approaches in a large simulation study of two-arm randomized clinical trials based on data from the European Multicenter Study about Spinal Cord Injury (EMSCI, ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01571531). We also use the new method as an alternative analysis of the historical Sygen®clinical trial. RESULTS: The simulation study of all postulated trial settings demonstrated that the statistical power of the novel method was greater than that of conventional methods. Baseline adjustments were more suited for the analysis of the upper extremity motor score compared to the spinal cord independence measure and its self-care subscore. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed baseline-adjusted proportional odds models allow the global treatment effect to be directly interpreted. This clear interpretation, the superior statistical power compared to the conventional analysis approaches, and the availability of open-source software support the application of this novel method for the analysis of ordinal outcomes of future clinical trials.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7204322
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72043222020-05-14 Baseline-adjusted proportional odds models for the quantification of treatment effects in trials with ordinal sum score outcomes Buri, Muriel Curt, Armin Steeves, John Hothorn, Torsten BMC Med Res Methodol Research Article BACKGROUND: Sum scores of ordinal outcomes are common in randomized clinical trials. The approaches routinely employed for assessing treatment effects, such as t-tests or Wilcoxon tests, are not particularly powerful in detecting changes in relevant parameters or lack the ability to incorporate baseline information. Hence, tailored statistical methods are needed for the analysis of ordinal outcomes in clinical research. METHODS: We propose baseline-adjusted proportional odds logistic regression models to overcome previous limitations in the analysis of ordinal outcomes in randomized clinical trials. For the validation of our method, we focus on common ordinal sum score outcomes of neurological clinical trials such as the upper extremity motor score, the spinal cord independence measure, and the self-care subscore of the latter. We compare the statistical power of our models to other conventional approaches in a large simulation study of two-arm randomized clinical trials based on data from the European Multicenter Study about Spinal Cord Injury (EMSCI, ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01571531). We also use the new method as an alternative analysis of the historical Sygen®clinical trial. RESULTS: The simulation study of all postulated trial settings demonstrated that the statistical power of the novel method was greater than that of conventional methods. Baseline adjustments were more suited for the analysis of the upper extremity motor score compared to the spinal cord independence measure and its self-care subscore. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed baseline-adjusted proportional odds models allow the global treatment effect to be directly interpreted. This clear interpretation, the superior statistical power compared to the conventional analysis approaches, and the availability of open-source software support the application of this novel method for the analysis of ordinal outcomes of future clinical trials. BioMed Central 2020-05-06 /pmc/articles/PMC7204322/ /pubmed/32375705 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-020-00984-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Buri, Muriel
Curt, Armin
Steeves, John
Hothorn, Torsten
Baseline-adjusted proportional odds models for the quantification of treatment effects in trials with ordinal sum score outcomes
title Baseline-adjusted proportional odds models for the quantification of treatment effects in trials with ordinal sum score outcomes
title_full Baseline-adjusted proportional odds models for the quantification of treatment effects in trials with ordinal sum score outcomes
title_fullStr Baseline-adjusted proportional odds models for the quantification of treatment effects in trials with ordinal sum score outcomes
title_full_unstemmed Baseline-adjusted proportional odds models for the quantification of treatment effects in trials with ordinal sum score outcomes
title_short Baseline-adjusted proportional odds models for the quantification of treatment effects in trials with ordinal sum score outcomes
title_sort baseline-adjusted proportional odds models for the quantification of treatment effects in trials with ordinal sum score outcomes
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7204322/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32375705
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-020-00984-2
work_keys_str_mv AT burimuriel baselineadjustedproportionaloddsmodelsforthequantificationoftreatmenteffectsintrialswithordinalsumscoreoutcomes
AT curtarmin baselineadjustedproportionaloddsmodelsforthequantificationoftreatmenteffectsintrialswithordinalsumscoreoutcomes
AT steevesjohn baselineadjustedproportionaloddsmodelsforthequantificationoftreatmenteffectsintrialswithordinalsumscoreoutcomes
AT hothorntorsten baselineadjustedproportionaloddsmodelsforthequantificationoftreatmenteffectsintrialswithordinalsumscoreoutcomes