Cargando…

Prognostic Value of Lymph Node Ratio in Breast Cancer Patients with Adequate Pathologic Evidence After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy

BACKGROUND: The prognostic role of axillary lymph node ratio (LNR) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in breast cancer has not been illuminated. This study was designed to investigate the prognostic role of LNR in breast cancer compared with traditional ypN stage. MATERIAL/METHODS: A total of 306...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ai, Xiang, Liao, Xin, Wang, Minhao, Hu, Ying, Li, Junyan, Zhang, Yi, Tang, Peng, Jiang, Jun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: International Scientific Literature, Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7204429/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32348295
http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.922420
_version_ 1783530063425175552
author Ai, Xiang
Liao, Xin
Wang, Minhao
Hu, Ying
Li, Junyan
Zhang, Yi
Tang, Peng
Jiang, Jun
author_facet Ai, Xiang
Liao, Xin
Wang, Minhao
Hu, Ying
Li, Junyan
Zhang, Yi
Tang, Peng
Jiang, Jun
author_sort Ai, Xiang
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The prognostic role of axillary lymph node ratio (LNR) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in breast cancer has not been illuminated. This study was designed to investigate the prognostic role of LNR in breast cancer compared with traditional ypN stage. MATERIAL/METHODS: A total of 306 breast cancer patients diagnosed with positive axillary lymph nodes from January 2007 to December 2014 were eligible for this retrospective analysis. All enrolled patients were treated with a median of 4 cycles of NAC followed by mastectomy and level I, II, and III axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). RESULTS: The median duration of follow-up was 78 months (range, 7–147 months). Univariate analysis indicated that both the LNR category (P<0.001) and ypN stage (P<0.001) were significant associated with event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS). However, multivariate analysis indicated that the LNR category was independently associated with EFS (P<0.001) and OS (P<0.001), while the ypN stage showed no statistical effect on EFS (P=0.391) or OS (P=0.081). On additional analyses stratified by molecular subtypes, we found that the prognosis of triple negative breast cancer could be better discriminated when the cutoff value of LNR was set at 0.15. CONCLUSIONS: LNR showed a superior predictive value in evaluating prognosis of breast cancer patients after NAC. In addition, the LNR cutoff point 0.15 can accurately discriminate survival outcomes for different triple negative breast cancer subtypes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7204429
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher International Scientific Literature, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72044292020-05-11 Prognostic Value of Lymph Node Ratio in Breast Cancer Patients with Adequate Pathologic Evidence After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Ai, Xiang Liao, Xin Wang, Minhao Hu, Ying Li, Junyan Zhang, Yi Tang, Peng Jiang, Jun Med Sci Monit Clinical Research BACKGROUND: The prognostic role of axillary lymph node ratio (LNR) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in breast cancer has not been illuminated. This study was designed to investigate the prognostic role of LNR in breast cancer compared with traditional ypN stage. MATERIAL/METHODS: A total of 306 breast cancer patients diagnosed with positive axillary lymph nodes from January 2007 to December 2014 were eligible for this retrospective analysis. All enrolled patients were treated with a median of 4 cycles of NAC followed by mastectomy and level I, II, and III axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). RESULTS: The median duration of follow-up was 78 months (range, 7–147 months). Univariate analysis indicated that both the LNR category (P<0.001) and ypN stage (P<0.001) were significant associated with event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS). However, multivariate analysis indicated that the LNR category was independently associated with EFS (P<0.001) and OS (P<0.001), while the ypN stage showed no statistical effect on EFS (P=0.391) or OS (P=0.081). On additional analyses stratified by molecular subtypes, we found that the prognosis of triple negative breast cancer could be better discriminated when the cutoff value of LNR was set at 0.15. CONCLUSIONS: LNR showed a superior predictive value in evaluating prognosis of breast cancer patients after NAC. In addition, the LNR cutoff point 0.15 can accurately discriminate survival outcomes for different triple negative breast cancer subtypes. International Scientific Literature, Inc. 2020-04-29 /pmc/articles/PMC7204429/ /pubmed/32348295 http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.922420 Text en © Med Sci Monit, 2020 This work is licensed under Creative Common Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) )
spellingShingle Clinical Research
Ai, Xiang
Liao, Xin
Wang, Minhao
Hu, Ying
Li, Junyan
Zhang, Yi
Tang, Peng
Jiang, Jun
Prognostic Value of Lymph Node Ratio in Breast Cancer Patients with Adequate Pathologic Evidence After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy
title Prognostic Value of Lymph Node Ratio in Breast Cancer Patients with Adequate Pathologic Evidence After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy
title_full Prognostic Value of Lymph Node Ratio in Breast Cancer Patients with Adequate Pathologic Evidence After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy
title_fullStr Prognostic Value of Lymph Node Ratio in Breast Cancer Patients with Adequate Pathologic Evidence After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy
title_full_unstemmed Prognostic Value of Lymph Node Ratio in Breast Cancer Patients with Adequate Pathologic Evidence After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy
title_short Prognostic Value of Lymph Node Ratio in Breast Cancer Patients with Adequate Pathologic Evidence After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy
title_sort prognostic value of lymph node ratio in breast cancer patients with adequate pathologic evidence after neoadjuvant chemotherapy
topic Clinical Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7204429/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32348295
http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.922420
work_keys_str_mv AT aixiang prognosticvalueoflymphnoderatioinbreastcancerpatientswithadequatepathologicevidenceafterneoadjuvantchemotherapy
AT liaoxin prognosticvalueoflymphnoderatioinbreastcancerpatientswithadequatepathologicevidenceafterneoadjuvantchemotherapy
AT wangminhao prognosticvalueoflymphnoderatioinbreastcancerpatientswithadequatepathologicevidenceafterneoadjuvantchemotherapy
AT huying prognosticvalueoflymphnoderatioinbreastcancerpatientswithadequatepathologicevidenceafterneoadjuvantchemotherapy
AT lijunyan prognosticvalueoflymphnoderatioinbreastcancerpatientswithadequatepathologicevidenceafterneoadjuvantchemotherapy
AT zhangyi prognosticvalueoflymphnoderatioinbreastcancerpatientswithadequatepathologicevidenceafterneoadjuvantchemotherapy
AT tangpeng prognosticvalueoflymphnoderatioinbreastcancerpatientswithadequatepathologicevidenceafterneoadjuvantchemotherapy
AT jiangjun prognosticvalueoflymphnoderatioinbreastcancerpatientswithadequatepathologicevidenceafterneoadjuvantchemotherapy