Cargando…

Ethical considerations in global surgery: a scoping review

INTRODUCTION: An unmet burden of surgical disease exists worldwide and is disproportionately shouldered by low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs). As the field of global surgery grows to meet this need, ethical considerations need to be addressed. Currently, there are no formal guidelines to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Grant, Chantalle Lauren, Robinson, Tessa, Al Hinai, Alreem, Mack, Cheryl, Guilfoyle, Regan, Saleh, Abdullah
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7204923/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32399258
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2020-002319
_version_ 1783530147782066176
author Grant, Chantalle Lauren
Robinson, Tessa
Al Hinai, Alreem
Mack, Cheryl
Guilfoyle, Regan
Saleh, Abdullah
author_facet Grant, Chantalle Lauren
Robinson, Tessa
Al Hinai, Alreem
Mack, Cheryl
Guilfoyle, Regan
Saleh, Abdullah
author_sort Grant, Chantalle Lauren
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: An unmet burden of surgical disease exists worldwide and is disproportionately shouldered by low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs). As the field of global surgery grows to meet this need, ethical considerations need to be addressed. Currently, there are no formal guidelines to help inform relevant stakeholders of the ethical challenges and considerations facing global surgical collaborations. The aim of this scoping review is to synthesise the existing literature on ethics in global surgery and identify gaps in the current knowledge. METHODS: A scoping review of relevant databases to identify the literature pertaining to ethics in global surgery was performed. Eligible articles addressed at least one ethical consideration in global surgery. A grounded theory approach to content analysis was used to identify themes in the included literature and guide the identification of gaps in existing literature. RESULTS: Four major ethical domains were identified in the literature: clinical care and delivery; education and exchange of trainees; research, monitoring and evaluation; and engagement in collaborations and partnerships. The majority of published literature related to issues of clinical care and delivery of the individual patient. Most of the published literature was published exclusively by authors in high-income countries (HICs) (80%), and the majority of articles were in the form of editorials or commentaries (69.1%). Only 12.7% of articles published were original research studies. CONCLUSION: The literature on ethics in global surgery remains sparse, with most publications coming from HICs, and focusing on clinical care and short-term surgical missions. Given that LMICs are frequently the recipients of global surgical initiatives, the relative absence of literature from their perspective needs to be addressed. Furthermore, there is a need for more literature focusing on the ethics surrounding sustainable collaborations and partnerships.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7204923
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72049232020-05-12 Ethical considerations in global surgery: a scoping review Grant, Chantalle Lauren Robinson, Tessa Al Hinai, Alreem Mack, Cheryl Guilfoyle, Regan Saleh, Abdullah BMJ Glob Health Original Research INTRODUCTION: An unmet burden of surgical disease exists worldwide and is disproportionately shouldered by low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs). As the field of global surgery grows to meet this need, ethical considerations need to be addressed. Currently, there are no formal guidelines to help inform relevant stakeholders of the ethical challenges and considerations facing global surgical collaborations. The aim of this scoping review is to synthesise the existing literature on ethics in global surgery and identify gaps in the current knowledge. METHODS: A scoping review of relevant databases to identify the literature pertaining to ethics in global surgery was performed. Eligible articles addressed at least one ethical consideration in global surgery. A grounded theory approach to content analysis was used to identify themes in the included literature and guide the identification of gaps in existing literature. RESULTS: Four major ethical domains were identified in the literature: clinical care and delivery; education and exchange of trainees; research, monitoring and evaluation; and engagement in collaborations and partnerships. The majority of published literature related to issues of clinical care and delivery of the individual patient. Most of the published literature was published exclusively by authors in high-income countries (HICs) (80%), and the majority of articles were in the form of editorials or commentaries (69.1%). Only 12.7% of articles published were original research studies. CONCLUSION: The literature on ethics in global surgery remains sparse, with most publications coming from HICs, and focusing on clinical care and short-term surgical missions. Given that LMICs are frequently the recipients of global surgical initiatives, the relative absence of literature from their perspective needs to be addressed. Furthermore, there is a need for more literature focusing on the ethics surrounding sustainable collaborations and partnerships. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-04-21 /pmc/articles/PMC7204923/ /pubmed/32399258 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2020-002319 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Research
Grant, Chantalle Lauren
Robinson, Tessa
Al Hinai, Alreem
Mack, Cheryl
Guilfoyle, Regan
Saleh, Abdullah
Ethical considerations in global surgery: a scoping review
title Ethical considerations in global surgery: a scoping review
title_full Ethical considerations in global surgery: a scoping review
title_fullStr Ethical considerations in global surgery: a scoping review
title_full_unstemmed Ethical considerations in global surgery: a scoping review
title_short Ethical considerations in global surgery: a scoping review
title_sort ethical considerations in global surgery: a scoping review
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7204923/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32399258
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2020-002319
work_keys_str_mv AT grantchantallelauren ethicalconsiderationsinglobalsurgeryascopingreview
AT robinsontessa ethicalconsiderationsinglobalsurgeryascopingreview
AT alhinaialreem ethicalconsiderationsinglobalsurgeryascopingreview
AT mackcheryl ethicalconsiderationsinglobalsurgeryascopingreview
AT guilfoyleregan ethicalconsiderationsinglobalsurgeryascopingreview
AT salehabdullah ethicalconsiderationsinglobalsurgeryascopingreview