Cargando…

Conceptual model for pluralistic healthcare behaviour: results from a qualitative study in southwestern Uganda

INTRODUCTION: Medical pluralism, or concurrent utilisation of multiple therapeutic modalities, is common in various international contexts, and has been characterised as a factor contributing to poor health outcomes in low-resource settings. Traditional healers are ubiquitous providers in most regio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sundararajan, Radhika, Mwanga-Amumpaire, Juliet, King, Rachel, Ware, Norma C
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7204928/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32317259
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033410
_version_ 1783530148923965440
author Sundararajan, Radhika
Mwanga-Amumpaire, Juliet
King, Rachel
Ware, Norma C
author_facet Sundararajan, Radhika
Mwanga-Amumpaire, Juliet
King, Rachel
Ware, Norma C
author_sort Sundararajan, Radhika
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Medical pluralism, or concurrent utilisation of multiple therapeutic modalities, is common in various international contexts, and has been characterised as a factor contributing to poor health outcomes in low-resource settings. Traditional healers are ubiquitous providers in most regions, including the study site of southwestern Uganda. Where both informal and formal healthcare services are both available, patients do not engage with both options equally. It is not well understood why patients choose to engage with one healthcare modality over the other. The goal of this study was to explain therapeutic itineraries and create a conceptual framework of pluralistic health behaviour. METHODS: In-depth interviews were conducted from September 2017 to February 2018 with patients seeking care at traditional healers (n=30) and at an outpatient medicine clinic (n=30) in Mbarara, Uganda; the study is nested within a longitudinal project examining HIV testing engagement among traditional healer-using communities. Inclusion criteria included age ≥18 years, and ability to provide informed consent. Participants were recruited from practices representing the range of healer specialties. Following an inductive approach, interview transcripts were reviewed and coded to identify conceptual categories explaining healthcare utilisation. RESULTS: We identified three broad categories relevant to healthcare utilisation: (1) traditional healers treat patients with ‘care’; (2) biomedicine uses ‘modern’ technologies and (3) peer ‘testimony’ influences healthcare engagement. These categories describe variables at the healthcare provider, healthcare system and peer levels that interrelate to motivate individual engagement in pluralistic health resources. CONCLUSIONS: Patients perceive clear advantages and disadvantages to biomedical and traditional care in medically pluralistic settings. We identified factors at the healthcare provider, healthcare system and peer levels which influence patients’ therapeutic itineraries. Our findings provide a basis to improve health outcomes in medically pluralistic settings, and underscore the importance of recognising traditional healers as important stakeholders in community health.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7204928
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72049282020-05-12 Conceptual model for pluralistic healthcare behaviour: results from a qualitative study in southwestern Uganda Sundararajan, Radhika Mwanga-Amumpaire, Juliet King, Rachel Ware, Norma C BMJ Open Global Health INTRODUCTION: Medical pluralism, or concurrent utilisation of multiple therapeutic modalities, is common in various international contexts, and has been characterised as a factor contributing to poor health outcomes in low-resource settings. Traditional healers are ubiquitous providers in most regions, including the study site of southwestern Uganda. Where both informal and formal healthcare services are both available, patients do not engage with both options equally. It is not well understood why patients choose to engage with one healthcare modality over the other. The goal of this study was to explain therapeutic itineraries and create a conceptual framework of pluralistic health behaviour. METHODS: In-depth interviews were conducted from September 2017 to February 2018 with patients seeking care at traditional healers (n=30) and at an outpatient medicine clinic (n=30) in Mbarara, Uganda; the study is nested within a longitudinal project examining HIV testing engagement among traditional healer-using communities. Inclusion criteria included age ≥18 years, and ability to provide informed consent. Participants were recruited from practices representing the range of healer specialties. Following an inductive approach, interview transcripts were reviewed and coded to identify conceptual categories explaining healthcare utilisation. RESULTS: We identified three broad categories relevant to healthcare utilisation: (1) traditional healers treat patients with ‘care’; (2) biomedicine uses ‘modern’ technologies and (3) peer ‘testimony’ influences healthcare engagement. These categories describe variables at the healthcare provider, healthcare system and peer levels that interrelate to motivate individual engagement in pluralistic health resources. CONCLUSIONS: Patients perceive clear advantages and disadvantages to biomedical and traditional care in medically pluralistic settings. We identified factors at the healthcare provider, healthcare system and peer levels which influence patients’ therapeutic itineraries. Our findings provide a basis to improve health outcomes in medically pluralistic settings, and underscore the importance of recognising traditional healers as important stakeholders in community health. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-04-20 /pmc/articles/PMC7204928/ /pubmed/32317259 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033410 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Global Health
Sundararajan, Radhika
Mwanga-Amumpaire, Juliet
King, Rachel
Ware, Norma C
Conceptual model for pluralistic healthcare behaviour: results from a qualitative study in southwestern Uganda
title Conceptual model for pluralistic healthcare behaviour: results from a qualitative study in southwestern Uganda
title_full Conceptual model for pluralistic healthcare behaviour: results from a qualitative study in southwestern Uganda
title_fullStr Conceptual model for pluralistic healthcare behaviour: results from a qualitative study in southwestern Uganda
title_full_unstemmed Conceptual model for pluralistic healthcare behaviour: results from a qualitative study in southwestern Uganda
title_short Conceptual model for pluralistic healthcare behaviour: results from a qualitative study in southwestern Uganda
title_sort conceptual model for pluralistic healthcare behaviour: results from a qualitative study in southwestern uganda
topic Global Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7204928/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32317259
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033410
work_keys_str_mv AT sundararajanradhika conceptualmodelforpluralistichealthcarebehaviourresultsfromaqualitativestudyinsouthwesternuganda
AT mwangaamumpairejuliet conceptualmodelforpluralistichealthcarebehaviourresultsfromaqualitativestudyinsouthwesternuganda
AT kingrachel conceptualmodelforpluralistichealthcarebehaviourresultsfromaqualitativestudyinsouthwesternuganda
AT warenormac conceptualmodelforpluralistichealthcarebehaviourresultsfromaqualitativestudyinsouthwesternuganda