Cargando…

Emergency Airway Management: A Look into the Practice, Rate of Success, and Adverse Events of 94 Endotracheal Intubations

CONTEXT: Endotracheal intubation in the critically unwell is a life-saving procedure, frequently performed in the emergency department (ED). The 4(th) National Audit Project (NAP4) of the Royal College of Anaesthetists and Difficult Airway Society, however, highlighted the deficiencies that could ha...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fadhlillah, Fiqry, Bury, Sarah, Grocholski, Ewa, Dean, Mike, Refson, Ali
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7204969/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32395052
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/JETS.JETS_100_19
_version_ 1783530158103199744
author Fadhlillah, Fiqry
Bury, Sarah
Grocholski, Ewa
Dean, Mike
Refson, Ali
author_facet Fadhlillah, Fiqry
Bury, Sarah
Grocholski, Ewa
Dean, Mike
Refson, Ali
author_sort Fadhlillah, Fiqry
collection PubMed
description CONTEXT: Endotracheal intubation in the critically unwell is a life-saving procedure, frequently performed in the emergency department (ED). The 4(th) National Audit Project (NAP4) of the Royal College of Anaesthetists and Difficult Airway Society, however, highlighted the deficiencies that could have led to serious harm. In direct response to NAP4, a 2018 guideline was published on the management of intubations in critically ill adults. AIMS: This study describes the current practice of endotracheal intubation, in comparison to the published 2018 guideline. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: A retrospective observational study in an ED of a district general hospital in Greater London. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Adult attendances from September 1, 2017, to September 1, 2018 (>18 years old) fulfilling the search criteria were reviewed, producing 1553 case notes. These cases were individually reviewed by the authors. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: Mann–Whitney U-test. RESULTS: There were 94 intubations, male to female ratio 1.8:1. The most common indication was for airway protection (n = 35), followed by respiratory failure (n = 23). There were 31 first-pass intubation successes. Intensivists performed most of the intubations (n = 66), followed by anesthetists (n = 13), and ED physicians (n = 10), but with no significant difference between the response rates of ED and external physicians (P = 0.0477). Propofol was the induction drug of choice (n = 37), with rocuronium the paralyzing agent of choice (n = 42). Altogether, there were eight complications reported. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides an overview of the intubation practices in a single-center ED. Non-ED physicians perform the majority of intubations, with a variety of induction and paralyzing agents being used. It adds to the growing call for better standardization and provision of care to patients with a deteriorating airway and the continued auditing of practice.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7204969
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72049692020-05-11 Emergency Airway Management: A Look into the Practice, Rate of Success, and Adverse Events of 94 Endotracheal Intubations Fadhlillah, Fiqry Bury, Sarah Grocholski, Ewa Dean, Mike Refson, Ali J Emerg Trauma Shock Original Article CONTEXT: Endotracheal intubation in the critically unwell is a life-saving procedure, frequently performed in the emergency department (ED). The 4(th) National Audit Project (NAP4) of the Royal College of Anaesthetists and Difficult Airway Society, however, highlighted the deficiencies that could have led to serious harm. In direct response to NAP4, a 2018 guideline was published on the management of intubations in critically ill adults. AIMS: This study describes the current practice of endotracheal intubation, in comparison to the published 2018 guideline. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: A retrospective observational study in an ED of a district general hospital in Greater London. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Adult attendances from September 1, 2017, to September 1, 2018 (>18 years old) fulfilling the search criteria were reviewed, producing 1553 case notes. These cases were individually reviewed by the authors. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: Mann–Whitney U-test. RESULTS: There were 94 intubations, male to female ratio 1.8:1. The most common indication was for airway protection (n = 35), followed by respiratory failure (n = 23). There were 31 first-pass intubation successes. Intensivists performed most of the intubations (n = 66), followed by anesthetists (n = 13), and ED physicians (n = 10), but with no significant difference between the response rates of ED and external physicians (P = 0.0477). Propofol was the induction drug of choice (n = 37), with rocuronium the paralyzing agent of choice (n = 42). Altogether, there were eight complications reported. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides an overview of the intubation practices in a single-center ED. Non-ED physicians perform the majority of intubations, with a variety of induction and paralyzing agents being used. It adds to the growing call for better standardization and provision of care to patients with a deteriorating airway and the continued auditing of practice. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2020 2020-03-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7204969/ /pubmed/32395052 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/JETS.JETS_100_19 Text en Copyright: © 2020 Journal of Emergencies, Trauma, and Shock http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Fadhlillah, Fiqry
Bury, Sarah
Grocholski, Ewa
Dean, Mike
Refson, Ali
Emergency Airway Management: A Look into the Practice, Rate of Success, and Adverse Events of 94 Endotracheal Intubations
title Emergency Airway Management: A Look into the Practice, Rate of Success, and Adverse Events of 94 Endotracheal Intubations
title_full Emergency Airway Management: A Look into the Practice, Rate of Success, and Adverse Events of 94 Endotracheal Intubations
title_fullStr Emergency Airway Management: A Look into the Practice, Rate of Success, and Adverse Events of 94 Endotracheal Intubations
title_full_unstemmed Emergency Airway Management: A Look into the Practice, Rate of Success, and Adverse Events of 94 Endotracheal Intubations
title_short Emergency Airway Management: A Look into the Practice, Rate of Success, and Adverse Events of 94 Endotracheal Intubations
title_sort emergency airway management: a look into the practice, rate of success, and adverse events of 94 endotracheal intubations
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7204969/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32395052
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/JETS.JETS_100_19
work_keys_str_mv AT fadhlillahfiqry emergencyairwaymanagementalookintothepracticerateofsuccessandadverseeventsof94endotrachealintubations
AT burysarah emergencyairwaymanagementalookintothepracticerateofsuccessandadverseeventsof94endotrachealintubations
AT grocholskiewa emergencyairwaymanagementalookintothepracticerateofsuccessandadverseeventsof94endotrachealintubations
AT deanmike emergencyairwaymanagementalookintothepracticerateofsuccessandadverseeventsof94endotrachealintubations
AT refsonali emergencyairwaymanagementalookintothepracticerateofsuccessandadverseeventsof94endotrachealintubations