Cargando…
Emergency Airway Management: A Look into the Practice, Rate of Success, and Adverse Events of 94 Endotracheal Intubations
CONTEXT: Endotracheal intubation in the critically unwell is a life-saving procedure, frequently performed in the emergency department (ED). The 4(th) National Audit Project (NAP4) of the Royal College of Anaesthetists and Difficult Airway Society, however, highlighted the deficiencies that could ha...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7204969/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32395052 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/JETS.JETS_100_19 |
_version_ | 1783530158103199744 |
---|---|
author | Fadhlillah, Fiqry Bury, Sarah Grocholski, Ewa Dean, Mike Refson, Ali |
author_facet | Fadhlillah, Fiqry Bury, Sarah Grocholski, Ewa Dean, Mike Refson, Ali |
author_sort | Fadhlillah, Fiqry |
collection | PubMed |
description | CONTEXT: Endotracheal intubation in the critically unwell is a life-saving procedure, frequently performed in the emergency department (ED). The 4(th) National Audit Project (NAP4) of the Royal College of Anaesthetists and Difficult Airway Society, however, highlighted the deficiencies that could have led to serious harm. In direct response to NAP4, a 2018 guideline was published on the management of intubations in critically ill adults. AIMS: This study describes the current practice of endotracheal intubation, in comparison to the published 2018 guideline. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: A retrospective observational study in an ED of a district general hospital in Greater London. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Adult attendances from September 1, 2017, to September 1, 2018 (>18 years old) fulfilling the search criteria were reviewed, producing 1553 case notes. These cases were individually reviewed by the authors. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: Mann–Whitney U-test. RESULTS: There were 94 intubations, male to female ratio 1.8:1. The most common indication was for airway protection (n = 35), followed by respiratory failure (n = 23). There were 31 first-pass intubation successes. Intensivists performed most of the intubations (n = 66), followed by anesthetists (n = 13), and ED physicians (n = 10), but with no significant difference between the response rates of ED and external physicians (P = 0.0477). Propofol was the induction drug of choice (n = 37), with rocuronium the paralyzing agent of choice (n = 42). Altogether, there were eight complications reported. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides an overview of the intubation practices in a single-center ED. Non-ED physicians perform the majority of intubations, with a variety of induction and paralyzing agents being used. It adds to the growing call for better standardization and provision of care to patients with a deteriorating airway and the continued auditing of practice. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7204969 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer - Medknow |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72049692020-05-11 Emergency Airway Management: A Look into the Practice, Rate of Success, and Adverse Events of 94 Endotracheal Intubations Fadhlillah, Fiqry Bury, Sarah Grocholski, Ewa Dean, Mike Refson, Ali J Emerg Trauma Shock Original Article CONTEXT: Endotracheal intubation in the critically unwell is a life-saving procedure, frequently performed in the emergency department (ED). The 4(th) National Audit Project (NAP4) of the Royal College of Anaesthetists and Difficult Airway Society, however, highlighted the deficiencies that could have led to serious harm. In direct response to NAP4, a 2018 guideline was published on the management of intubations in critically ill adults. AIMS: This study describes the current practice of endotracheal intubation, in comparison to the published 2018 guideline. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: A retrospective observational study in an ED of a district general hospital in Greater London. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Adult attendances from September 1, 2017, to September 1, 2018 (>18 years old) fulfilling the search criteria were reviewed, producing 1553 case notes. These cases were individually reviewed by the authors. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: Mann–Whitney U-test. RESULTS: There were 94 intubations, male to female ratio 1.8:1. The most common indication was for airway protection (n = 35), followed by respiratory failure (n = 23). There were 31 first-pass intubation successes. Intensivists performed most of the intubations (n = 66), followed by anesthetists (n = 13), and ED physicians (n = 10), but with no significant difference between the response rates of ED and external physicians (P = 0.0477). Propofol was the induction drug of choice (n = 37), with rocuronium the paralyzing agent of choice (n = 42). Altogether, there were eight complications reported. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides an overview of the intubation practices in a single-center ED. Non-ED physicians perform the majority of intubations, with a variety of induction and paralyzing agents being used. It adds to the growing call for better standardization and provision of care to patients with a deteriorating airway and the continued auditing of practice. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2020 2020-03-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7204969/ /pubmed/32395052 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/JETS.JETS_100_19 Text en Copyright: © 2020 Journal of Emergencies, Trauma, and Shock http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Fadhlillah, Fiqry Bury, Sarah Grocholski, Ewa Dean, Mike Refson, Ali Emergency Airway Management: A Look into the Practice, Rate of Success, and Adverse Events of 94 Endotracheal Intubations |
title | Emergency Airway Management: A Look into the Practice, Rate of Success, and Adverse Events of 94 Endotracheal Intubations |
title_full | Emergency Airway Management: A Look into the Practice, Rate of Success, and Adverse Events of 94 Endotracheal Intubations |
title_fullStr | Emergency Airway Management: A Look into the Practice, Rate of Success, and Adverse Events of 94 Endotracheal Intubations |
title_full_unstemmed | Emergency Airway Management: A Look into the Practice, Rate of Success, and Adverse Events of 94 Endotracheal Intubations |
title_short | Emergency Airway Management: A Look into the Practice, Rate of Success, and Adverse Events of 94 Endotracheal Intubations |
title_sort | emergency airway management: a look into the practice, rate of success, and adverse events of 94 endotracheal intubations |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7204969/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32395052 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/JETS.JETS_100_19 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fadhlillahfiqry emergencyairwaymanagementalookintothepracticerateofsuccessandadverseeventsof94endotrachealintubations AT burysarah emergencyairwaymanagementalookintothepracticerateofsuccessandadverseeventsof94endotrachealintubations AT grocholskiewa emergencyairwaymanagementalookintothepracticerateofsuccessandadverseeventsof94endotrachealintubations AT deanmike emergencyairwaymanagementalookintothepracticerateofsuccessandadverseeventsof94endotrachealintubations AT refsonali emergencyairwaymanagementalookintothepracticerateofsuccessandadverseeventsof94endotrachealintubations |