Cargando…

Utilization of canola and sunflower meals as replacements for soybean meal in a corn silage-based stocker system(1)

Two experiments were conducted to evaluate 3 silage-based stocker diets. In Exp. 1, diets were fed to a total of 276 animals over a period of 3 yr and performance data was collected. In Exp. 2, the same diets were subjected to in vitro digestion for 5 time periods: 0, 6, 12, 24, and 48 h, to evaluat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lourenço, J. M., Froetschel, M. A., Segers, J. R., Tucker, J. J., Stewart, R. L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7204982/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32704681
http://dx.doi.org/10.2527/tas2017.0068
_version_ 1783530161197547520
author Lourenço, J. M.
Froetschel, M. A.
Segers, J. R.
Tucker, J. J.
Stewart, R. L.
author_facet Lourenço, J. M.
Froetschel, M. A.
Segers, J. R.
Tucker, J. J.
Stewart, R. L.
author_sort Lourenço, J. M.
collection PubMed
description Two experiments were conducted to evaluate 3 silage-based stocker diets. In Exp. 1, diets were fed to a total of 276 animals over a period of 3 yr and performance data was collected. In Exp. 2, the same diets were subjected to in vitro digestion for 5 time periods: 0, 6, 12, 24, and 48 h, to evaluate IVDMD, production of fermentation end products, and efficiency of transformation of energy. The experimental diets were similar, except for their protein supplements. They were composed of: 1) 74% corn silage, 15.2% ground ear corn, and 10.8% soybean meal (SBM); 2) 74.4% corn silage, 9.8% ground ear corn, and 15.8% canola meal (CAN); 3) 74.5% corn silage, 9.8% ground ear corn, and 15.7% sunflower meal (SUN). Results from Exp. 1 showed that DMI was similar across all treatments (P = 0.167), but ADG was greater (P = 0.007) for animals fed either SBM or CAN than for animals fed SUN (1.29, 1.28, and 1.20 kg/d, respectively). Both CAN and SUN significantly reduced (P < 0.001) daily feeding cost per animal in comparison to SBM. Exp. 2 revealed that total VFA production was similar for all treatments (P = 0.185), and greatest molar proportions of propionate were observed for SBM and CAN (P = 0.02). Additionally, IVDMD was highest for SBM (P < 0.001). Regression analysis showed that most of the evaluated traits followed a quadratic trend for incubation times (P ≤ 0.02). On average, the in vitro technique used in this study was able to account for 97.03% of the caloric transformations suffered by DE throughout the different incubation times. Overall, our findings revealed that although animals receiving SUN had the cheapest daily feeding cost, important traits like ADG and feed conversion rate were negatively affected by this treatment. In contrast, data showed that CAN was an effective replacement for SBM for it maintained similar animal performance while decreasing feed costs. Therefore, from a producer standpoint, CAN is a viable alternative to replace the more costly SBM diet in silage-based stocker operations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7204982
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72049822020-07-22 Utilization of canola and sunflower meals as replacements for soybean meal in a corn silage-based stocker system(1) Lourenço, J. M. Froetschel, M. A. Segers, J. R. Tucker, J. J. Stewart, R. L. Transl Anim Sci Articles Two experiments were conducted to evaluate 3 silage-based stocker diets. In Exp. 1, diets were fed to a total of 276 animals over a period of 3 yr and performance data was collected. In Exp. 2, the same diets were subjected to in vitro digestion for 5 time periods: 0, 6, 12, 24, and 48 h, to evaluate IVDMD, production of fermentation end products, and efficiency of transformation of energy. The experimental diets were similar, except for their protein supplements. They were composed of: 1) 74% corn silage, 15.2% ground ear corn, and 10.8% soybean meal (SBM); 2) 74.4% corn silage, 9.8% ground ear corn, and 15.8% canola meal (CAN); 3) 74.5% corn silage, 9.8% ground ear corn, and 15.7% sunflower meal (SUN). Results from Exp. 1 showed that DMI was similar across all treatments (P = 0.167), but ADG was greater (P = 0.007) for animals fed either SBM or CAN than for animals fed SUN (1.29, 1.28, and 1.20 kg/d, respectively). Both CAN and SUN significantly reduced (P < 0.001) daily feeding cost per animal in comparison to SBM. Exp. 2 revealed that total VFA production was similar for all treatments (P = 0.185), and greatest molar proportions of propionate were observed for SBM and CAN (P = 0.02). Additionally, IVDMD was highest for SBM (P < 0.001). Regression analysis showed that most of the evaluated traits followed a quadratic trend for incubation times (P ≤ 0.02). On average, the in vitro technique used in this study was able to account for 97.03% of the caloric transformations suffered by DE throughout the different incubation times. Overall, our findings revealed that although animals receiving SUN had the cheapest daily feeding cost, important traits like ADG and feed conversion rate were negatively affected by this treatment. In contrast, data showed that CAN was an effective replacement for SBM for it maintained similar animal performance while decreasing feed costs. Therefore, from a producer standpoint, CAN is a viable alternative to replace the more costly SBM diet in silage-based stocker operations. Oxford University Press 2017-12-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7204982/ /pubmed/32704681 http://dx.doi.org/10.2527/tas2017.0068 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
spellingShingle Articles
Lourenço, J. M.
Froetschel, M. A.
Segers, J. R.
Tucker, J. J.
Stewart, R. L.
Utilization of canola and sunflower meals as replacements for soybean meal in a corn silage-based stocker system(1)
title Utilization of canola and sunflower meals as replacements for soybean meal in a corn silage-based stocker system(1)
title_full Utilization of canola and sunflower meals as replacements for soybean meal in a corn silage-based stocker system(1)
title_fullStr Utilization of canola and sunflower meals as replacements for soybean meal in a corn silage-based stocker system(1)
title_full_unstemmed Utilization of canola and sunflower meals as replacements for soybean meal in a corn silage-based stocker system(1)
title_short Utilization of canola and sunflower meals as replacements for soybean meal in a corn silage-based stocker system(1)
title_sort utilization of canola and sunflower meals as replacements for soybean meal in a corn silage-based stocker system(1)
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7204982/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32704681
http://dx.doi.org/10.2527/tas2017.0068
work_keys_str_mv AT lourencojm utilizationofcanolaandsunflowermealsasreplacementsforsoybeanmealinacornsilagebasedstockersystem1
AT froetschelma utilizationofcanolaandsunflowermealsasreplacementsforsoybeanmealinacornsilagebasedstockersystem1
AT segersjr utilizationofcanolaandsunflowermealsasreplacementsforsoybeanmealinacornsilagebasedstockersystem1
AT tuckerjj utilizationofcanolaandsunflowermealsasreplacementsforsoybeanmealinacornsilagebasedstockersystem1
AT stewartrl utilizationofcanolaandsunflowermealsasreplacementsforsoybeanmealinacornsilagebasedstockersystem1