Cargando…

National Beef Quality Audit-2016: Phase 1, Face-to-face interviews

The National Beef Quality Audit (NBQA) is conducted every 5 yr and was most recently again conducted in 2016. Face-to-face interviews gauged progress in quality associated with live cattle production using procedures first utilized in NBQA 2011. The 2016 NBQA was the first in which interviews concer...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hasty, J. D., Pfeifer, M. M., Eastwood, L. C., Gredell, D. A., Gifford, C. L., Levey, J. R., Cashman, C. M., Woerner, D. R., Martin, J. N., Delmore, R. J., Griffin, W. B., VanOverbeke, D. L., Mafi, G. G., Boykin, C. A., Hale, D. S., Kerth, C. R., Griffin, D. B., Arnold, A. N., Savell, J. W., Pendell, D. L., Belk, K. E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7205349/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32704657
http://dx.doi.org/10.2527/tas2017.0039
_version_ 1783530225735303168
author Hasty, J. D.
Pfeifer, M. M.
Eastwood, L. C.
Gredell, D. A.
Gifford, C. L.
Levey, J. R.
Cashman, C. M.
Woerner, D. R.
Martin, J. N.
Delmore, R. J.
Griffin, W. B.
VanOverbeke, D. L.
Mafi, G. G.
Boykin, C. A.
Hale, D. S.
Kerth, C. R.
Griffin, D. B.
Arnold, A. N.
Savell, J. W.
Pendell, D. L.
Belk, K. E.
author_facet Hasty, J. D.
Pfeifer, M. M.
Eastwood, L. C.
Gredell, D. A.
Gifford, C. L.
Levey, J. R.
Cashman, C. M.
Woerner, D. R.
Martin, J. N.
Delmore, R. J.
Griffin, W. B.
VanOverbeke, D. L.
Mafi, G. G.
Boykin, C. A.
Hale, D. S.
Kerth, C. R.
Griffin, D. B.
Arnold, A. N.
Savell, J. W.
Pendell, D. L.
Belk, K. E.
author_sort Hasty, J. D.
collection PubMed
description The National Beef Quality Audit (NBQA) is conducted every 5 yr and was most recently again conducted in 2016. Face-to-face interviews gauged progress in quality associated with live cattle production using procedures first utilized in NBQA 2011. The 2016 NBQA was the first in which interviews concerning fed steers and heifers were combined with an audit of market cow and bull beef. Face-to-face interviews were designed to illicit definitions for beef quality, estimate willingness to pay (WTP) for quality attributes, establish relative importance rankings for important quality factors, and assess images, strengths, weaknesses, potential threats, and shifting trends in the beef industry since the 2011 audit. Individuals making purchasing decisions in 5 market sectors of the steer/heifer and cow/bull beef supply chain were interviewed, including packers (n = 36), retailers (including large and small supermarket companies and warehouse food sales companies; n = 35), food service operators (including quick-serve, full-service, and institutional establishments; n = 29), further processors (n = 64), and peripherally-related government and trade organizations (GTO; n = 30). Face-to-face interviews were conducted between January and November of 2016 using a designed dynamic routing system. Definitions (as described by interviewees) for 7 pre-determined quality factors, including: (1) How and where the cattle were raised, (2) Lean, fat, and bone, (3) Weight and size, (4) Visual characteristics, (5) Food safety, (6) Eating satisfaction, and (7) Cattle genetics were recorded verbatim and categorized into similar responses for analysis. Compared to NBQA-2011, a higher percentage of companies were willing to pay premiums for guaranteed quality attributes, but overall were willing to pay lower average premiums than the companies interviewed in 2011. Food safety had the highest share of preference among all interviewees, generating a double-digit advantage over any other quality factor. The 2 beef industries have an overall positive image among interviewees, and despite lingering weaknesses, product quality continued to be at the forefront of the strengths category for both steer and heifer beef and market cow and bull beef.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7205349
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72053492020-07-22 National Beef Quality Audit-2016: Phase 1, Face-to-face interviews Hasty, J. D. Pfeifer, M. M. Eastwood, L. C. Gredell, D. A. Gifford, C. L. Levey, J. R. Cashman, C. M. Woerner, D. R. Martin, J. N. Delmore, R. J. Griffin, W. B. VanOverbeke, D. L. Mafi, G. G. Boykin, C. A. Hale, D. S. Kerth, C. R. Griffin, D. B. Arnold, A. N. Savell, J. W. Pendell, D. L. Belk, K. E. Transl Anim Sci Article The National Beef Quality Audit (NBQA) is conducted every 5 yr and was most recently again conducted in 2016. Face-to-face interviews gauged progress in quality associated with live cattle production using procedures first utilized in NBQA 2011. The 2016 NBQA was the first in which interviews concerning fed steers and heifers were combined with an audit of market cow and bull beef. Face-to-face interviews were designed to illicit definitions for beef quality, estimate willingness to pay (WTP) for quality attributes, establish relative importance rankings for important quality factors, and assess images, strengths, weaknesses, potential threats, and shifting trends in the beef industry since the 2011 audit. Individuals making purchasing decisions in 5 market sectors of the steer/heifer and cow/bull beef supply chain were interviewed, including packers (n = 36), retailers (including large and small supermarket companies and warehouse food sales companies; n = 35), food service operators (including quick-serve, full-service, and institutional establishments; n = 29), further processors (n = 64), and peripherally-related government and trade organizations (GTO; n = 30). Face-to-face interviews were conducted between January and November of 2016 using a designed dynamic routing system. Definitions (as described by interviewees) for 7 pre-determined quality factors, including: (1) How and where the cattle were raised, (2) Lean, fat, and bone, (3) Weight and size, (4) Visual characteristics, (5) Food safety, (6) Eating satisfaction, and (7) Cattle genetics were recorded verbatim and categorized into similar responses for analysis. Compared to NBQA-2011, a higher percentage of companies were willing to pay premiums for guaranteed quality attributes, but overall were willing to pay lower average premiums than the companies interviewed in 2011. Food safety had the highest share of preference among all interviewees, generating a double-digit advantage over any other quality factor. The 2 beef industries have an overall positive image among interviewees, and despite lingering weaknesses, product quality continued to be at the forefront of the strengths category for both steer and heifer beef and market cow and bull beef. Oxford University Press 2017-09-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7205349/ /pubmed/32704657 http://dx.doi.org/10.2527/tas2017.0039 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
spellingShingle Article
Hasty, J. D.
Pfeifer, M. M.
Eastwood, L. C.
Gredell, D. A.
Gifford, C. L.
Levey, J. R.
Cashman, C. M.
Woerner, D. R.
Martin, J. N.
Delmore, R. J.
Griffin, W. B.
VanOverbeke, D. L.
Mafi, G. G.
Boykin, C. A.
Hale, D. S.
Kerth, C. R.
Griffin, D. B.
Arnold, A. N.
Savell, J. W.
Pendell, D. L.
Belk, K. E.
National Beef Quality Audit-2016: Phase 1, Face-to-face interviews
title National Beef Quality Audit-2016: Phase 1, Face-to-face interviews
title_full National Beef Quality Audit-2016: Phase 1, Face-to-face interviews
title_fullStr National Beef Quality Audit-2016: Phase 1, Face-to-face interviews
title_full_unstemmed National Beef Quality Audit-2016: Phase 1, Face-to-face interviews
title_short National Beef Quality Audit-2016: Phase 1, Face-to-face interviews
title_sort national beef quality audit-2016: phase 1, face-to-face interviews
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7205349/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32704657
http://dx.doi.org/10.2527/tas2017.0039
work_keys_str_mv AT hastyjd nationalbeefqualityaudit2016phase1facetofaceinterviews
AT pfeifermm nationalbeefqualityaudit2016phase1facetofaceinterviews
AT eastwoodlc nationalbeefqualityaudit2016phase1facetofaceinterviews
AT gredellda nationalbeefqualityaudit2016phase1facetofaceinterviews
AT giffordcl nationalbeefqualityaudit2016phase1facetofaceinterviews
AT leveyjr nationalbeefqualityaudit2016phase1facetofaceinterviews
AT cashmancm nationalbeefqualityaudit2016phase1facetofaceinterviews
AT woernerdr nationalbeefqualityaudit2016phase1facetofaceinterviews
AT martinjn nationalbeefqualityaudit2016phase1facetofaceinterviews
AT delmorerj nationalbeefqualityaudit2016phase1facetofaceinterviews
AT griffinwb nationalbeefqualityaudit2016phase1facetofaceinterviews
AT vanoverbekedl nationalbeefqualityaudit2016phase1facetofaceinterviews
AT mafigg nationalbeefqualityaudit2016phase1facetofaceinterviews
AT boykinca nationalbeefqualityaudit2016phase1facetofaceinterviews
AT haleds nationalbeefqualityaudit2016phase1facetofaceinterviews
AT kerthcr nationalbeefqualityaudit2016phase1facetofaceinterviews
AT griffindb nationalbeefqualityaudit2016phase1facetofaceinterviews
AT arnoldan nationalbeefqualityaudit2016phase1facetofaceinterviews
AT savelljw nationalbeefqualityaudit2016phase1facetofaceinterviews
AT pendelldl nationalbeefqualityaudit2016phase1facetofaceinterviews
AT belkke nationalbeefqualityaudit2016phase1facetofaceinterviews