Cargando…

Evaluation of raw pork as a commercially manufactured diet option for zoo-managed African wildcats (Felis silvestris lybica)

Second to beef, pork is a major protein source produced in the US. Properly sourced and handled pork could be utilized as a protein option for zoo-managed carnivores. Concerns of high levels of microbial populations in raw meat diets are common. The objectives of this study were to determine apparen...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Iske, C. J., Morris, C. L., Kappen, K. L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7205353/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32704663
http://dx.doi.org/10.2527/tas2017.0047
_version_ 1783530226680070144
author Iske, C. J.
Morris, C. L.
Kappen, K. L.
author_facet Iske, C. J.
Morris, C. L.
Kappen, K. L.
author_sort Iske, C. J.
collection PubMed
description Second to beef, pork is a major protein source produced in the US. Properly sourced and handled pork could be utilized as a protein option for zoo-managed carnivores. Concerns of high levels of microbial populations in raw meat diets are common. The objectives of this study were to determine apparent total tract macronutrient and energy digestibility and fecal scores from cats fed a commercially manufactured raw pork-based diet compared with commercially available raw carnivore diets formulated with either horse or beef and evaluate typical microbial population variation among the diets. Dietary treatments consisted of 4 raw meat-based diets: Horse, Beef, Pork, and beef/horse Blend. All diets were highly digestible, especially fat digestibility (98.6 to 99.7%) in which there were no statistical differences among diets. Digestibility of organic matter (OM) was greater (P = 0.05) when cats consumed the Blend diet (97.2%) compared to the Pork diet (93.1%). Fecal scores ranged from 1.6 to 2.6 (on a 5-point scale), with Beef (2.6) being greater than (P = 0.01) Horse (1.6) and (P = 0.02) Pork (1.9). E. coli counts ranged from 110 to 10,000 cfu/g; total coliforms: 150 to 28,000 cfu/g; yeast: 20 to 4,000 cfu/g; mold count: not detectable to 10 cfu/g; and aerobic plate count: 23,000 to 26,000,000 cfu/g. Staphylococcus aureus was not detected in any of the diets. Salmonella was presumptive positive in the Pork and Blend diet, and was negative in the other 2 diets. In conclusion, commercially manufactured diets have varying microbial counts. All diets, including the raw pork-based diet were well utilized by exotic small cats and can be included among dietary options for managed felids.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7205353
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72053532020-07-22 Evaluation of raw pork as a commercially manufactured diet option for zoo-managed African wildcats (Felis silvestris lybica) Iske, C. J. Morris, C. L. Kappen, K. L. Transl Anim Sci Article Second to beef, pork is a major protein source produced in the US. Properly sourced and handled pork could be utilized as a protein option for zoo-managed carnivores. Concerns of high levels of microbial populations in raw meat diets are common. The objectives of this study were to determine apparent total tract macronutrient and energy digestibility and fecal scores from cats fed a commercially manufactured raw pork-based diet compared with commercially available raw carnivore diets formulated with either horse or beef and evaluate typical microbial population variation among the diets. Dietary treatments consisted of 4 raw meat-based diets: Horse, Beef, Pork, and beef/horse Blend. All diets were highly digestible, especially fat digestibility (98.6 to 99.7%) in which there were no statistical differences among diets. Digestibility of organic matter (OM) was greater (P = 0.05) when cats consumed the Blend diet (97.2%) compared to the Pork diet (93.1%). Fecal scores ranged from 1.6 to 2.6 (on a 5-point scale), with Beef (2.6) being greater than (P = 0.01) Horse (1.6) and (P = 0.02) Pork (1.9). E. coli counts ranged from 110 to 10,000 cfu/g; total coliforms: 150 to 28,000 cfu/g; yeast: 20 to 4,000 cfu/g; mold count: not detectable to 10 cfu/g; and aerobic plate count: 23,000 to 26,000,000 cfu/g. Staphylococcus aureus was not detected in any of the diets. Salmonella was presumptive positive in the Pork and Blend diet, and was negative in the other 2 diets. In conclusion, commercially manufactured diets have varying microbial counts. All diets, including the raw pork-based diet were well utilized by exotic small cats and can be included among dietary options for managed felids. Oxford University Press 2017-09-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7205353/ /pubmed/32704663 http://dx.doi.org/10.2527/tas2017.0047 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
spellingShingle Article
Iske, C. J.
Morris, C. L.
Kappen, K. L.
Evaluation of raw pork as a commercially manufactured diet option for zoo-managed African wildcats (Felis silvestris lybica)
title Evaluation of raw pork as a commercially manufactured diet option for zoo-managed African wildcats (Felis silvestris lybica)
title_full Evaluation of raw pork as a commercially manufactured diet option for zoo-managed African wildcats (Felis silvestris lybica)
title_fullStr Evaluation of raw pork as a commercially manufactured diet option for zoo-managed African wildcats (Felis silvestris lybica)
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of raw pork as a commercially manufactured diet option for zoo-managed African wildcats (Felis silvestris lybica)
title_short Evaluation of raw pork as a commercially manufactured diet option for zoo-managed African wildcats (Felis silvestris lybica)
title_sort evaluation of raw pork as a commercially manufactured diet option for zoo-managed african wildcats (felis silvestris lybica)
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7205353/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32704663
http://dx.doi.org/10.2527/tas2017.0047
work_keys_str_mv AT iskecj evaluationofrawporkasacommerciallymanufactureddietoptionforzoomanagedafricanwildcatsfelissilvestrislybica
AT morriscl evaluationofrawporkasacommerciallymanufactureddietoptionforzoomanagedafricanwildcatsfelissilvestrislybica
AT kappenkl evaluationofrawporkasacommerciallymanufactureddietoptionforzoomanagedafricanwildcatsfelissilvestrislybica