Cargando…

Differences in microbiome and virome between cattle and horses in the same farm

OBJECTIVE: The ecosystem of an animal farm is composed of various elements, such as animals, farmers, plants, feed, soil, and microorganisms. A domesticated animal’s health is largely connected with the reservoir of bacteria and viruses in animal farms. Although a few studies have focused on explori...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Park, Jongbin, Kim, Eun Bae
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Asian-Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies (AAAP) and Korean Society of Animal Science and Technology (KSAST) 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7206377/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32054207
http://dx.doi.org/10.5713/ajas.19.0267
_version_ 1783530403587424256
author Park, Jongbin
Kim, Eun Bae
author_facet Park, Jongbin
Kim, Eun Bae
author_sort Park, Jongbin
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The ecosystem of an animal farm is composed of various elements, such as animals, farmers, plants, feed, soil, and microorganisms. A domesticated animal’s health is largely connected with the reservoir of bacteria and viruses in animal farms. Although a few studies have focused on exploring the gut microbiome of animals, communities of microbiota and viruses in feedlots have not been thoroughly investigated. METHODS: Here, we collected feces and dust samples (4 groups: cattle feces, C_F; horse feces, H_F; cattle dust, C_D; and horse dust, H_D) from cattle and horse farms sharing the same housing and investigated their microbiome/virome communities by Illumina sequencing. RESULTS: Dust groups (C_D and H_D) showed higher microbial diversity than feces groups (C_F and H_F) regardless of animal species. From the microbial community analysis, all the samples from the four groups have major phyla such as Proteobacteria (min 37.1% to max 42.8%), Firmicutes (19.1% to 24.9%), Bacteroidetes (10.6% to 22.1%), and Actinobacteria (6.1% to 20.5%). The abundance of Streptococcus, which commonly recognized as equine pathogens, was significantly higher in the horse group (H_D and H_F). Over 99% among the classified virome reads were classified as Caudovirales, a group of tailed bacteriophages, in all four groups. Foot-and-mouth disease virus and equine adenovirus, which cause deadly diseases in cattle and horse, respectively, were not detected. CONCLUSION: Our results will provide baseline information to understand different gut and environmental microbial ecology between two livestock species.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7206377
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Asian-Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies (AAAP) and Korean Society of Animal Science and Technology (KSAST)
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72063772020-06-01 Differences in microbiome and virome between cattle and horses in the same farm Park, Jongbin Kim, Eun Bae Asian-Australas J Anim Sci Article OBJECTIVE: The ecosystem of an animal farm is composed of various elements, such as animals, farmers, plants, feed, soil, and microorganisms. A domesticated animal’s health is largely connected with the reservoir of bacteria and viruses in animal farms. Although a few studies have focused on exploring the gut microbiome of animals, communities of microbiota and viruses in feedlots have not been thoroughly investigated. METHODS: Here, we collected feces and dust samples (4 groups: cattle feces, C_F; horse feces, H_F; cattle dust, C_D; and horse dust, H_D) from cattle and horse farms sharing the same housing and investigated their microbiome/virome communities by Illumina sequencing. RESULTS: Dust groups (C_D and H_D) showed higher microbial diversity than feces groups (C_F and H_F) regardless of animal species. From the microbial community analysis, all the samples from the four groups have major phyla such as Proteobacteria (min 37.1% to max 42.8%), Firmicutes (19.1% to 24.9%), Bacteroidetes (10.6% to 22.1%), and Actinobacteria (6.1% to 20.5%). The abundance of Streptococcus, which commonly recognized as equine pathogens, was significantly higher in the horse group (H_D and H_F). Over 99% among the classified virome reads were classified as Caudovirales, a group of tailed bacteriophages, in all four groups. Foot-and-mouth disease virus and equine adenovirus, which cause deadly diseases in cattle and horse, respectively, were not detected. CONCLUSION: Our results will provide baseline information to understand different gut and environmental microbial ecology between two livestock species. Asian-Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies (AAAP) and Korean Society of Animal Science and Technology (KSAST) 2020-06 2019-10-22 /pmc/articles/PMC7206377/ /pubmed/32054207 http://dx.doi.org/10.5713/ajas.19.0267 Text en Copyright © 2020 by Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Article
Park, Jongbin
Kim, Eun Bae
Differences in microbiome and virome between cattle and horses in the same farm
title Differences in microbiome and virome between cattle and horses in the same farm
title_full Differences in microbiome and virome between cattle and horses in the same farm
title_fullStr Differences in microbiome and virome between cattle and horses in the same farm
title_full_unstemmed Differences in microbiome and virome between cattle and horses in the same farm
title_short Differences in microbiome and virome between cattle and horses in the same farm
title_sort differences in microbiome and virome between cattle and horses in the same farm
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7206377/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32054207
http://dx.doi.org/10.5713/ajas.19.0267
work_keys_str_mv AT parkjongbin differencesinmicrobiomeandviromebetweencattleandhorsesinthesamefarm
AT kimeunbae differencesinmicrobiomeandviromebetweencattleandhorsesinthesamefarm