Cargando…

Cyclic Shift on Multi-component Grammars

Multi-component grammars, known in the literature as “multiple context-free grammars” and “linear context-free rewriting systems”, describe the structure of a string by defining the properties of k-tuples of its substrings, in the same way as ordinary formal grammars (Chomsky’s “context-free”) defin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Okhotin, Alexander, Sorokin, Alexey
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7206622/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-40608-0_20
_version_ 1783530445038682112
author Okhotin, Alexander
Sorokin, Alexey
author_facet Okhotin, Alexander
Sorokin, Alexey
author_sort Okhotin, Alexander
collection PubMed
description Multi-component grammars, known in the literature as “multiple context-free grammars” and “linear context-free rewriting systems”, describe the structure of a string by defining the properties of k-tuples of its substrings, in the same way as ordinary formal grammars (Chomsky’s “context-free”) define properties of substrings. It is shown that, for every fixed k, the family of languages described by k-component grammars is closed under the cyclic shift operation. On the other hand, the subfamily defined by well-nested k-component grammars is not closed under the cyclic shift, yet their cyclic shifts are always defined by well-nested [Formula: see text]-component grammars.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7206622
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72066222020-05-08 Cyclic Shift on Multi-component Grammars Okhotin, Alexander Sorokin, Alexey Language and Automata Theory and Applications Article Multi-component grammars, known in the literature as “multiple context-free grammars” and “linear context-free rewriting systems”, describe the structure of a string by defining the properties of k-tuples of its substrings, in the same way as ordinary formal grammars (Chomsky’s “context-free”) define properties of substrings. It is shown that, for every fixed k, the family of languages described by k-component grammars is closed under the cyclic shift operation. On the other hand, the subfamily defined by well-nested k-component grammars is not closed under the cyclic shift, yet their cyclic shifts are always defined by well-nested [Formula: see text]-component grammars. 2020-01-07 /pmc/articles/PMC7206622/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-40608-0_20 Text en © Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Article
Okhotin, Alexander
Sorokin, Alexey
Cyclic Shift on Multi-component Grammars
title Cyclic Shift on Multi-component Grammars
title_full Cyclic Shift on Multi-component Grammars
title_fullStr Cyclic Shift on Multi-component Grammars
title_full_unstemmed Cyclic Shift on Multi-component Grammars
title_short Cyclic Shift on Multi-component Grammars
title_sort cyclic shift on multi-component grammars
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7206622/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-40608-0_20
work_keys_str_mv AT okhotinalexander cyclicshiftonmulticomponentgrammars
AT sorokinalexey cyclicshiftonmulticomponentgrammars