Cargando…

Physicochemical Quality Properties of Loin and Tenderloin Ham from Sows

This study was conducted to investigate the physicochemical properties of hams obtained from loin and tenderloin cuts from standard pigs and sows. pH levels of loin ham before cooking, standard pig was significantly lower than that of sow (p<0.001). The lightness (L*) and yellowness (b*) values o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Gye-Woong, Kim, Hack-Youn
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Society for Food Science of Animal Resources 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7207085/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32426724
http://dx.doi.org/10.5851/kosfa.2020.e26
_version_ 1783530534566100992
author Kim, Gye-Woong
Kim, Hack-Youn
author_facet Kim, Gye-Woong
Kim, Hack-Youn
author_sort Kim, Gye-Woong
collection PubMed
description This study was conducted to investigate the physicochemical properties of hams obtained from loin and tenderloin cuts from standard pigs and sows. pH levels of loin ham before cooking, standard pig was significantly lower than that of sow (p<0.001). The lightness (L*) and yellowness (b*) values of loin ham from standard pigs were significantly higher than those of sow loin ham (p<0.001). The water-holding capacity (WHC) and curing yield of sow loin was significantly higher than standard loin (p<0.01). The cooking loss of standard pig loin ham was significantly higher than that of sow loin ham (p<0.01). Differences in sensory quality evaluation, except in the case of tenderness, for the two loin hams were not significant. pH levels of tenderloin ham before cooking, standard pig was significantly lower than that of sow (p<0.001). Redness (a*) values of before and after cooking tenderloin ham of sow was higher than that of standard pig (p<0.001). L* values of tenderloin ham of standard pig was significantly higher than that of sow (p<0.001). WHC and curing yield of tenderloin ham from sow was significantly higher than that from a standard pig (p<0.001, p<0.05). The cooking losses of sow and standard pig tenderloin ham were 26.06% and 28.31%, respectively (p<0.001). Differences in sensory quality evaluation, except in the case of tenderness and color, for the two tenderloin hams were not significant. In conclusion, sow pigs loin and tenderloin is suitable for ham product more than standard pigs loin and tenderloin.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7207085
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Korean Society for Food Science of Animal Resources
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72070852020-05-18 Physicochemical Quality Properties of Loin and Tenderloin Ham from Sows Kim, Gye-Woong Kim, Hack-Youn Food Sci Anim Resour Article This study was conducted to investigate the physicochemical properties of hams obtained from loin and tenderloin cuts from standard pigs and sows. pH levels of loin ham before cooking, standard pig was significantly lower than that of sow (p<0.001). The lightness (L*) and yellowness (b*) values of loin ham from standard pigs were significantly higher than those of sow loin ham (p<0.001). The water-holding capacity (WHC) and curing yield of sow loin was significantly higher than standard loin (p<0.01). The cooking loss of standard pig loin ham was significantly higher than that of sow loin ham (p<0.01). Differences in sensory quality evaluation, except in the case of tenderness, for the two loin hams were not significant. pH levels of tenderloin ham before cooking, standard pig was significantly lower than that of sow (p<0.001). Redness (a*) values of before and after cooking tenderloin ham of sow was higher than that of standard pig (p<0.001). L* values of tenderloin ham of standard pig was significantly higher than that of sow (p<0.001). WHC and curing yield of tenderloin ham from sow was significantly higher than that from a standard pig (p<0.001, p<0.05). The cooking losses of sow and standard pig tenderloin ham were 26.06% and 28.31%, respectively (p<0.001). Differences in sensory quality evaluation, except in the case of tenderness and color, for the two tenderloin hams were not significant. In conclusion, sow pigs loin and tenderloin is suitable for ham product more than standard pigs loin and tenderloin. Korean Society for Food Science of Animal Resources 2020-04 2020-04-30 /pmc/articles/PMC7207085/ /pubmed/32426724 http://dx.doi.org/10.5851/kosfa.2020.e26 Text en © Korean Society for Food Science of Animal Resources http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Article
Kim, Gye-Woong
Kim, Hack-Youn
Physicochemical Quality Properties of Loin and Tenderloin Ham from Sows
title Physicochemical Quality Properties of Loin and Tenderloin Ham from Sows
title_full Physicochemical Quality Properties of Loin and Tenderloin Ham from Sows
title_fullStr Physicochemical Quality Properties of Loin and Tenderloin Ham from Sows
title_full_unstemmed Physicochemical Quality Properties of Loin and Tenderloin Ham from Sows
title_short Physicochemical Quality Properties of Loin and Tenderloin Ham from Sows
title_sort physicochemical quality properties of loin and tenderloin ham from sows
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7207085/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32426724
http://dx.doi.org/10.5851/kosfa.2020.e26
work_keys_str_mv AT kimgyewoong physicochemicalqualitypropertiesofloinandtenderloinhamfromsows
AT kimhackyoun physicochemicalqualitypropertiesofloinandtenderloinhamfromsows