Cargando…

A comparison of tandem ring and tandem ovoid treatment as a curative brachytherapy component for cervical cancer

PURPOSE: The standard treatment for locally advanced stage cervical cancer is definitive radiotherapy, the quality of which affects both survival and side effects. Brachytherapy is a major component of definitive radiotherapy; it is administered using different techniques and applicators. The purpos...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gursel, Sukriye Bilge, Serarslan, Alparslan, Meydan, Ahmet Deniz, Okumus, Nilgun, Yasayacak, Tenzile
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Termedia Publishing House 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7207230/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32395134
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/jcb.2020.94308
_version_ 1783530558695931904
author Gursel, Sukriye Bilge
Serarslan, Alparslan
Meydan, Ahmet Deniz
Okumus, Nilgun
Yasayacak, Tenzile
author_facet Gursel, Sukriye Bilge
Serarslan, Alparslan
Meydan, Ahmet Deniz
Okumus, Nilgun
Yasayacak, Tenzile
author_sort Gursel, Sukriye Bilge
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The standard treatment for locally advanced stage cervical cancer is definitive radiotherapy, the quality of which affects both survival and side effects. Brachytherapy is a major component of definitive radiotherapy; it is administered using different techniques and applicators. The purpose of this study was to dosimetrically compare tandem ovoid (T-ovoid) and tandem ring (T-ring) brachytherapy treatments. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Both applicator sets were applied to the same 20 patients, and treatment plans were made three-dimensionally (3D), with high-risk clinical target volume (HR-CTV) and organs at risk contoured. The HR-CTV was defined according to post-external magnetic resonance results. The patients with residual tumors not exceeding one-third of the parametrium were included in this study, while patients with larger masses were excluded and received interstitial therapy. The doses were calculated for both plans. Optimization for the HR-CTV was made with the aim that the equivalent dose according to 2 Gy (EQD(2)) of 90% of the HR-CTV (D(90)) would be higher than 85 Gy, without exceeding the maximum dose for organs at risk. Then, pairwise dosimetric comparisons were performed. RESULTS: Plans were compared dosimetrically according to the HR-CTV, point A and B doses, and organs at risk. Although the point A and B doses were higher with T-ovoid use, the 3D HR-CTV coverage was statistically better with T-ring application (EQD(2) of HR-CTV D(90): 97.46 Gy for T-ring and 88.44 Gy for T-ovoid; p < 0.0001). In addition, the rectum and bladder doses were statistically lower with T-ring usage (EQD(2) of rectum, 2 cc; T-ring, 63.10 Gy; T-ovoid, 74.99 Gy; p < 0.0001; EQD(2) of bladder, 2 cc; T-ring, 85.26 Gy; T-ovoid, 89.05 Gy; p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: In our study with a limited number of samples, T-ring applicator seems to offer better 3D brachytherapy dosimetry for both HR-CTV and nearby organs at risk.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7207230
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Termedia Publishing House
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72072302020-05-11 A comparison of tandem ring and tandem ovoid treatment as a curative brachytherapy component for cervical cancer Gursel, Sukriye Bilge Serarslan, Alparslan Meydan, Ahmet Deniz Okumus, Nilgun Yasayacak, Tenzile J Contemp Brachytherapy Original Paper PURPOSE: The standard treatment for locally advanced stage cervical cancer is definitive radiotherapy, the quality of which affects both survival and side effects. Brachytherapy is a major component of definitive radiotherapy; it is administered using different techniques and applicators. The purpose of this study was to dosimetrically compare tandem ovoid (T-ovoid) and tandem ring (T-ring) brachytherapy treatments. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Both applicator sets were applied to the same 20 patients, and treatment plans were made three-dimensionally (3D), with high-risk clinical target volume (HR-CTV) and organs at risk contoured. The HR-CTV was defined according to post-external magnetic resonance results. The patients with residual tumors not exceeding one-third of the parametrium were included in this study, while patients with larger masses were excluded and received interstitial therapy. The doses were calculated for both plans. Optimization for the HR-CTV was made with the aim that the equivalent dose according to 2 Gy (EQD(2)) of 90% of the HR-CTV (D(90)) would be higher than 85 Gy, without exceeding the maximum dose for organs at risk. Then, pairwise dosimetric comparisons were performed. RESULTS: Plans were compared dosimetrically according to the HR-CTV, point A and B doses, and organs at risk. Although the point A and B doses were higher with T-ovoid use, the 3D HR-CTV coverage was statistically better with T-ring application (EQD(2) of HR-CTV D(90): 97.46 Gy for T-ring and 88.44 Gy for T-ovoid; p < 0.0001). In addition, the rectum and bladder doses were statistically lower with T-ring usage (EQD(2) of rectum, 2 cc; T-ring, 63.10 Gy; T-ovoid, 74.99 Gy; p < 0.0001; EQD(2) of bladder, 2 cc; T-ring, 85.26 Gy; T-ovoid, 89.05 Gy; p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: In our study with a limited number of samples, T-ring applicator seems to offer better 3D brachytherapy dosimetry for both HR-CTV and nearby organs at risk. Termedia Publishing House 2020-04-08 2020-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7207230/ /pubmed/32395134 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/jcb.2020.94308 Text en Copyright © 2020 Termedia http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/)
spellingShingle Original Paper
Gursel, Sukriye Bilge
Serarslan, Alparslan
Meydan, Ahmet Deniz
Okumus, Nilgun
Yasayacak, Tenzile
A comparison of tandem ring and tandem ovoid treatment as a curative brachytherapy component for cervical cancer
title A comparison of tandem ring and tandem ovoid treatment as a curative brachytherapy component for cervical cancer
title_full A comparison of tandem ring and tandem ovoid treatment as a curative brachytherapy component for cervical cancer
title_fullStr A comparison of tandem ring and tandem ovoid treatment as a curative brachytherapy component for cervical cancer
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of tandem ring and tandem ovoid treatment as a curative brachytherapy component for cervical cancer
title_short A comparison of tandem ring and tandem ovoid treatment as a curative brachytherapy component for cervical cancer
title_sort comparison of tandem ring and tandem ovoid treatment as a curative brachytherapy component for cervical cancer
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7207230/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32395134
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/jcb.2020.94308
work_keys_str_mv AT gurselsukriyebilge acomparisonoftandemringandtandemovoidtreatmentasacurativebrachytherapycomponentforcervicalcancer
AT serarslanalparslan acomparisonoftandemringandtandemovoidtreatmentasacurativebrachytherapycomponentforcervicalcancer
AT meydanahmetdeniz acomparisonoftandemringandtandemovoidtreatmentasacurativebrachytherapycomponentforcervicalcancer
AT okumusnilgun acomparisonoftandemringandtandemovoidtreatmentasacurativebrachytherapycomponentforcervicalcancer
AT yasayacaktenzile acomparisonoftandemringandtandemovoidtreatmentasacurativebrachytherapycomponentforcervicalcancer
AT gurselsukriyebilge comparisonoftandemringandtandemovoidtreatmentasacurativebrachytherapycomponentforcervicalcancer
AT serarslanalparslan comparisonoftandemringandtandemovoidtreatmentasacurativebrachytherapycomponentforcervicalcancer
AT meydanahmetdeniz comparisonoftandemringandtandemovoidtreatmentasacurativebrachytherapycomponentforcervicalcancer
AT okumusnilgun comparisonoftandemringandtandemovoidtreatmentasacurativebrachytherapycomponentforcervicalcancer
AT yasayacaktenzile comparisonoftandemringandtandemovoidtreatmentasacurativebrachytherapycomponentforcervicalcancer