Cargando…

SUN-542 The Effect of Energy Deprivation on Metabolic Hormone Responses to Meals

Background: Intermittent caloric restriction (ICR) has recently gained popularity as a weight-loss strategy; however, fasting metabolic hormones and dynamic meal-related responses, are not well-established in this setting. Methods: We measured metabolic hormone responses to 5-days of neutral or decr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shekhar, Skand, Leka, Helen, Kim, Anne, Purse, Bona, Hersch, Katie R, McGee, Christopher, McGrath, John, Smith-Ryan, Abbie E, Hall, Janet Elizabeth
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7207716/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1210/jendso/bvaa046.1468
_version_ 1783530670558019584
author Shekhar, Skand
Leka, Helen
Kim, Anne
Purse, Bona
Hersch, Katie R
McGee, Christopher
McGrath, John
Smith-Ryan, Abbie E
Hall, Janet Elizabeth
author_facet Shekhar, Skand
Leka, Helen
Kim, Anne
Purse, Bona
Hersch, Katie R
McGee, Christopher
McGrath, John
Smith-Ryan, Abbie E
Hall, Janet Elizabeth
author_sort Shekhar, Skand
collection PubMed
description Background: Intermittent caloric restriction (ICR) has recently gained popularity as a weight-loss strategy; however, fasting metabolic hormones and dynamic meal-related responses, are not well-established in this setting. Methods: We measured metabolic hormone responses to 5-days of neutral or decreased energy availability (NEA, 45 kcal/kg LBM*d vs DEA, 20 kcal/kg LBM*d) in the early follicular phase (EFP) in 19 regularly-cycling, sedentary, women (age 23.36± 2.08 yr; mean±SD). Hunger was assessed using a visual analogue scale on the 5(th) day of each condition. Scheduled breakfast and lunch were administered according to assigned caloric intake, while an afternoon snack based on NEA was provided on both occasions. Blood was sampled for leptin, insulin, glucose, and GH at 10-min intervals and cortisol was measured at 30-min intervals over eight hours starting at 0800 h, while Orexin A and adiponectin were measured in fasting samples. AUC for each hormone for every meal and diet condition were analyzed using linear mixed models. Insulin and insulin/glucose ratio (I/G) were also adjusted for meal calories. Percentage body fat mass was measured every visit using air displacement plethysmography (BodPod®). Results are presented as least square mean ± sem. Results: There were no differences in body mass index or % fat mass after NEA vs DEA although there was a significant increase in hunger with DEA (p=0.002). Fasting levels of glucose and insulin were unchanged while leptin decreased with DEA (1.27±0.07 and 1.04±0.07 ng/mL, NEA and DEA respectively; p<0.0001), and Orexin A increased (0.55±0.04 and 0.60±0.04 ng/mL; p=0.04). The AUC for glucose was lower with DEA across all meals (p<0.0001). Insulin, I/G and I/G normalized for ingested calories (nI/G) decreased in response to DEA (p<0.005, p<0.05 and p<0.0001). The slope of the increase in leptin across the day was not different between NEA and DEA (p=0.20). Adiponectin, GH and cortisol were unaffected by DEA. Conclusion: These studies indicate that although fasting glucose and insulin are unaffected by short-term caloric restriction, the insulin response to glucose is attenuated even when adjusting for meal-related calories. Orexin A increased and leptin decreased with reduced caloric intake, acting, at least in part, to stimulate appetite. Taken together, these hormonal responses, directed at preserving energy homeostasis, have important implications for understanding the potential efficacy of intermittent caloric restriction.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7207716
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72077162020-05-13 SUN-542 The Effect of Energy Deprivation on Metabolic Hormone Responses to Meals Shekhar, Skand Leka, Helen Kim, Anne Purse, Bona Hersch, Katie R McGee, Christopher McGrath, John Smith-Ryan, Abbie E Hall, Janet Elizabeth J Endocr Soc Cardiovascular Endocrinology Background: Intermittent caloric restriction (ICR) has recently gained popularity as a weight-loss strategy; however, fasting metabolic hormones and dynamic meal-related responses, are not well-established in this setting. Methods: We measured metabolic hormone responses to 5-days of neutral or decreased energy availability (NEA, 45 kcal/kg LBM*d vs DEA, 20 kcal/kg LBM*d) in the early follicular phase (EFP) in 19 regularly-cycling, sedentary, women (age 23.36± 2.08 yr; mean±SD). Hunger was assessed using a visual analogue scale on the 5(th) day of each condition. Scheduled breakfast and lunch were administered according to assigned caloric intake, while an afternoon snack based on NEA was provided on both occasions. Blood was sampled for leptin, insulin, glucose, and GH at 10-min intervals and cortisol was measured at 30-min intervals over eight hours starting at 0800 h, while Orexin A and adiponectin were measured in fasting samples. AUC for each hormone for every meal and diet condition were analyzed using linear mixed models. Insulin and insulin/glucose ratio (I/G) were also adjusted for meal calories. Percentage body fat mass was measured every visit using air displacement plethysmography (BodPod®). Results are presented as least square mean ± sem. Results: There were no differences in body mass index or % fat mass after NEA vs DEA although there was a significant increase in hunger with DEA (p=0.002). Fasting levels of glucose and insulin were unchanged while leptin decreased with DEA (1.27±0.07 and 1.04±0.07 ng/mL, NEA and DEA respectively; p<0.0001), and Orexin A increased (0.55±0.04 and 0.60±0.04 ng/mL; p=0.04). The AUC for glucose was lower with DEA across all meals (p<0.0001). Insulin, I/G and I/G normalized for ingested calories (nI/G) decreased in response to DEA (p<0.005, p<0.05 and p<0.0001). The slope of the increase in leptin across the day was not different between NEA and DEA (p=0.20). Adiponectin, GH and cortisol were unaffected by DEA. Conclusion: These studies indicate that although fasting glucose and insulin are unaffected by short-term caloric restriction, the insulin response to glucose is attenuated even when adjusting for meal-related calories. Orexin A increased and leptin decreased with reduced caloric intake, acting, at least in part, to stimulate appetite. Taken together, these hormonal responses, directed at preserving energy homeostasis, have important implications for understanding the potential efficacy of intermittent caloric restriction. Oxford University Press 2020-05-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7207716/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1210/jendso/bvaa046.1468 Text en © Endocrine Society 2020. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Cardiovascular Endocrinology
Shekhar, Skand
Leka, Helen
Kim, Anne
Purse, Bona
Hersch, Katie R
McGee, Christopher
McGrath, John
Smith-Ryan, Abbie E
Hall, Janet Elizabeth
SUN-542 The Effect of Energy Deprivation on Metabolic Hormone Responses to Meals
title SUN-542 The Effect of Energy Deprivation on Metabolic Hormone Responses to Meals
title_full SUN-542 The Effect of Energy Deprivation on Metabolic Hormone Responses to Meals
title_fullStr SUN-542 The Effect of Energy Deprivation on Metabolic Hormone Responses to Meals
title_full_unstemmed SUN-542 The Effect of Energy Deprivation on Metabolic Hormone Responses to Meals
title_short SUN-542 The Effect of Energy Deprivation on Metabolic Hormone Responses to Meals
title_sort sun-542 the effect of energy deprivation on metabolic hormone responses to meals
topic Cardiovascular Endocrinology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7207716/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1210/jendso/bvaa046.1468
work_keys_str_mv AT shekharskand sun542theeffectofenergydeprivationonmetabolichormoneresponsestomeals
AT lekahelen sun542theeffectofenergydeprivationonmetabolichormoneresponsestomeals
AT kimanne sun542theeffectofenergydeprivationonmetabolichormoneresponsestomeals
AT pursebona sun542theeffectofenergydeprivationonmetabolichormoneresponsestomeals
AT herschkatier sun542theeffectofenergydeprivationonmetabolichormoneresponsestomeals
AT mcgeechristopher sun542theeffectofenergydeprivationonmetabolichormoneresponsestomeals
AT mcgrathjohn sun542theeffectofenergydeprivationonmetabolichormoneresponsestomeals
AT smithryanabbiee sun542theeffectofenergydeprivationonmetabolichormoneresponsestomeals
AT halljanetelizabeth sun542theeffectofenergydeprivationonmetabolichormoneresponsestomeals