SAT-432 Pharmacokinetics (PK) and Exposure-Response Relationship of Teprotumumab, an Insulin-Like Growth Factor-1 Receptor (IGF-1R) Blocking Antibody, in Active Thyroid Eye Disease (TED)

Introduction: Teprotumumab treatment resulted in statistically and clinically meaningful improvements across multiple facets of active TED and was generally well-tolerated in Phase 2 and 3 trials.(1,2) An initial intravenous infusion of 10 mg/kg followed by 20 mg/kg every 3 weeks was selected based on in vitro activity and clinical PK profile, to maintain pharmacologically active exposures and >90% saturation of IGF-1R over dosing intervals and to achieve efficacy at a well-tolerated dose for this vision-threatening disease. Methods: Population PK analysis were performed on data from a Phase 1 oncology study (n=60)(3) and Phase 2 and 3 trials in active TED (N=83)(2,3) and covariate effect on PK was assessed. Exposure-response relationship was evaluated in TED studies for key efficacy endpoints (proptosis response rate, % patients with a clinical activity score value of 0 or 1, and diplopia responder rate) and selected safety variables (hyperglycemia and muscle spasms). Results: Teprotumumab PK was linear in TED patients and consistent with other immunoglobulin G1 monoclonal antibodies (IgG1 mAbs), with low systemic clearance (0.334 L/day), low volume of distribution (3.9 L for central compartment and 4.2 L for peripheral compartment), and long elimination half-life (19.9 days). (4,5) Model-predicted mean (± standard deviation) steady-state area under the concentration curve (AUC(ss)), peak (C(max,ss)), and trough (C(min,ss)) concentrations in TED patients were 131 (± 30.9) mg∙hr/mL, 643 (± 130) µg/mL and 157 (± 50.6) µg/mL, respectively, suggesting low inter-subject variability. Population PK analysis indicated no significant impact of baseline age, gender, race, weight, smoking status, renal impairment (mild/moderate), and hepatic function (total bilirubin, aspartate and alanine aminotransferases) on teprotumumab PK. Female patients had 15% higher C(max,ss) but similar AUC compared to male patients, which is not considered clinically relevant. Exposure-response analysis from the TED dose regimen indicated no meaningful correlations between exposures (AUC(ss), C(max,ss) and C(min,ss)) and key efficacy endpoints or selected safety variables, supporting the demonstrated, favorable benefit-risk profile of the TED dose regimen.(2) Conclusion: Teprotumumab PK was characterized in TED patients by long elimination half-life, low systemic clearance and low volume of distribution, consistent with other IgG1 mAbs. There was no meaningful exposure-response relationship at the selected TED dose regimen for both efficacy and safety endpoints, supporting the teprotumumab dose regimen used in TED patients. Reference: (1) Smith TJ, et al. N Engl J Med 2017;376:1748-1761. (2) Douglas RS, et al. AACE 2019 late-breaking abstract. (3) ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00400361. (4) Dirks NL et al. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2010;49(10):633-59. (5) Ryman JT et al. CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol. 2017;6(9):576-88.