Cargando…

SUN-116 The Role of (68)Gallium DOTATATE PET/CT Versus (18)F-FDOPA PET/CT in the Imaging of Neuroendocrine Neoplasms in Patients with Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia Type 1 (MEN1)

Background: Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NEN) are a heterogenous group of tumors. Patients with the multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1) syndrome often manifest with simultaneous functional and non-functional NEN in various endocrine glands. In MEN1, nuclear medicine plays an important role in th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tepede, Aisha, Lee, Maya, Welch, James, Mandl, Adel, Bansal, Rashika, Cochran, Craig, Agarwal, Sunita Kishore, Simonds, William F, Weinstein, Lee Scott, Millo, Corina Madalina, Sadowski, Samira, Blau, Jenny
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7207902/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1210/jendso/bvaa046.1364
_version_ 1783530714755497984
author Tepede, Aisha
Lee, Maya
Welch, James
Mandl, Adel
Bansal, Rashika
Cochran, Craig
Agarwal, Sunita Kishore
Simonds, William F
Weinstein, Lee Scott
Millo, Corina Madalina
Sadowski, Samira
Blau, Jenny
author_facet Tepede, Aisha
Lee, Maya
Welch, James
Mandl, Adel
Bansal, Rashika
Cochran, Craig
Agarwal, Sunita Kishore
Simonds, William F
Weinstein, Lee Scott
Millo, Corina Madalina
Sadowski, Samira
Blau, Jenny
author_sort Tepede, Aisha
collection PubMed
description Background: Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NEN) are a heterogenous group of tumors. Patients with the multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1) syndrome often manifest with simultaneous functional and non-functional NEN in various endocrine glands. In MEN1, nuclear medicine plays an important role in the diagnostic work-up and localization of NEN. Little is known about the comparative efficacy of (68)Ga-Dotatate PET/CT (DOTA) versus (18)F-FDOPA PET/CT (FDOPA) and both versus non-nuclear medicine imaging (CT and MRI) in the identification of primary and metastatic NEN. Methods: This prospective MEN1 cohort study evaluated 15 germline MEN1 mutation-positive patients. Subjects were imaged using CT, MRI, DOTA and (18)F-FDOPA. Radiological review with a multidisciplinary team was performed for each patient. Results: One-hundred twenty-nine total lesions were identified using any of the four scans. DOTA sensitivity was 69% (89/129; 95% CI 61% to 76%) with a mean standardized uptake value (SUV) of 33.9 ± 30.1, FDOPA sensitivity was 18% (23/129; 95% CI 12% to 25%) with mean SUV of 12.1 ± 15.16. DOTA identified an additional 50 lesions not seen on CT (of which MRI detected 8 lesions with an average size 0.95 cm ± 0.48; 3 pancreatic, 2 duodenal, 2 liver, and 1 lymph node) and identified 55 lesions not seen on MRI (of which CT identified 13 with a mean size of 1.1 cm ± 0.45; 1 lung, 4 pancreatic, 2 duodenal, 1 liver, and 5 lymph nodes). Overall, CT detected 51.2% (66/129) of lesions (mean 0.61 cm ± 0.73; 95% CI 43% to 60%) and MRI detected 39.5% (51/129; 0.47 cm ± 0.71; 95% CI 32% to 48%), and there was no significant difference in the size of lesions detected (p=0.18). Analysis by organ NEN revealed equal sensitivity between FDOPA and DOTA for lung carcinoid, detecting 33% (4/12) of lesions, while CT detected 92% (11/12) of lesions. In the duodenum, DOTA identified 100% (11 /11) of lesions, while FDOPA had poor sensitivity (9%) in this location. Within the pancreas, DOTA has a sensitivity of 81% (31/38), while FDOPA had a sensitivity of 21% (8/38). CT localized 42% (16/38) of pancreatic lesions, of which MRI missed 6. Interestingly, DOTA missed 7 pancreatic lesions all approximately 1cm or larger, which is previously unrecognized (range 0.9 - 1.8cm). Twenty-three liver metastases were detected on anatomic imaging (CT identified 14, while MRI detected 15, with only 9 overlapping lesions). DOTA identified 60% (14/23) of lesions, of which 3 lesions were missed by CT and MRI. However, DOTA was more sensitive in the liver than FDOPA which only detected 2 lesions. FDOPA detected one lesion in the adrenal (0.9cm) that was not seen on DOTA. Conclusion: DOTA imaging proved to be superior to FDOPA, CT and MRI overall in detecting NENs in MEN1, specifically in the duodenum. Pancreatic NEN missed by DOTA may represent higher grade tumors and may benefit from (18)FDG PET/CT imaging.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7207902
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72079022020-05-13 SUN-116 The Role of (68)Gallium DOTATATE PET/CT Versus (18)F-FDOPA PET/CT in the Imaging of Neuroendocrine Neoplasms in Patients with Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia Type 1 (MEN1) Tepede, Aisha Lee, Maya Welch, James Mandl, Adel Bansal, Rashika Cochran, Craig Agarwal, Sunita Kishore Simonds, William F Weinstein, Lee Scott Millo, Corina Madalina Sadowski, Samira Blau, Jenny J Endocr Soc Tumor Biology Background: Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NEN) are a heterogenous group of tumors. Patients with the multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1) syndrome often manifest with simultaneous functional and non-functional NEN in various endocrine glands. In MEN1, nuclear medicine plays an important role in the diagnostic work-up and localization of NEN. Little is known about the comparative efficacy of (68)Ga-Dotatate PET/CT (DOTA) versus (18)F-FDOPA PET/CT (FDOPA) and both versus non-nuclear medicine imaging (CT and MRI) in the identification of primary and metastatic NEN. Methods: This prospective MEN1 cohort study evaluated 15 germline MEN1 mutation-positive patients. Subjects were imaged using CT, MRI, DOTA and (18)F-FDOPA. Radiological review with a multidisciplinary team was performed for each patient. Results: One-hundred twenty-nine total lesions were identified using any of the four scans. DOTA sensitivity was 69% (89/129; 95% CI 61% to 76%) with a mean standardized uptake value (SUV) of 33.9 ± 30.1, FDOPA sensitivity was 18% (23/129; 95% CI 12% to 25%) with mean SUV of 12.1 ± 15.16. DOTA identified an additional 50 lesions not seen on CT (of which MRI detected 8 lesions with an average size 0.95 cm ± 0.48; 3 pancreatic, 2 duodenal, 2 liver, and 1 lymph node) and identified 55 lesions not seen on MRI (of which CT identified 13 with a mean size of 1.1 cm ± 0.45; 1 lung, 4 pancreatic, 2 duodenal, 1 liver, and 5 lymph nodes). Overall, CT detected 51.2% (66/129) of lesions (mean 0.61 cm ± 0.73; 95% CI 43% to 60%) and MRI detected 39.5% (51/129; 0.47 cm ± 0.71; 95% CI 32% to 48%), and there was no significant difference in the size of lesions detected (p=0.18). Analysis by organ NEN revealed equal sensitivity between FDOPA and DOTA for lung carcinoid, detecting 33% (4/12) of lesions, while CT detected 92% (11/12) of lesions. In the duodenum, DOTA identified 100% (11 /11) of lesions, while FDOPA had poor sensitivity (9%) in this location. Within the pancreas, DOTA has a sensitivity of 81% (31/38), while FDOPA had a sensitivity of 21% (8/38). CT localized 42% (16/38) of pancreatic lesions, of which MRI missed 6. Interestingly, DOTA missed 7 pancreatic lesions all approximately 1cm or larger, which is previously unrecognized (range 0.9 - 1.8cm). Twenty-three liver metastases were detected on anatomic imaging (CT identified 14, while MRI detected 15, with only 9 overlapping lesions). DOTA identified 60% (14/23) of lesions, of which 3 lesions were missed by CT and MRI. However, DOTA was more sensitive in the liver than FDOPA which only detected 2 lesions. FDOPA detected one lesion in the adrenal (0.9cm) that was not seen on DOTA. Conclusion: DOTA imaging proved to be superior to FDOPA, CT and MRI overall in detecting NENs in MEN1, specifically in the duodenum. Pancreatic NEN missed by DOTA may represent higher grade tumors and may benefit from (18)FDG PET/CT imaging. Oxford University Press 2020-05-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7207902/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1210/jendso/bvaa046.1364 Text en © Endocrine Society 2020. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Tumor Biology
Tepede, Aisha
Lee, Maya
Welch, James
Mandl, Adel
Bansal, Rashika
Cochran, Craig
Agarwal, Sunita Kishore
Simonds, William F
Weinstein, Lee Scott
Millo, Corina Madalina
Sadowski, Samira
Blau, Jenny
SUN-116 The Role of (68)Gallium DOTATATE PET/CT Versus (18)F-FDOPA PET/CT in the Imaging of Neuroendocrine Neoplasms in Patients with Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia Type 1 (MEN1)
title SUN-116 The Role of (68)Gallium DOTATATE PET/CT Versus (18)F-FDOPA PET/CT in the Imaging of Neuroendocrine Neoplasms in Patients with Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia Type 1 (MEN1)
title_full SUN-116 The Role of (68)Gallium DOTATATE PET/CT Versus (18)F-FDOPA PET/CT in the Imaging of Neuroendocrine Neoplasms in Patients with Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia Type 1 (MEN1)
title_fullStr SUN-116 The Role of (68)Gallium DOTATATE PET/CT Versus (18)F-FDOPA PET/CT in the Imaging of Neuroendocrine Neoplasms in Patients with Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia Type 1 (MEN1)
title_full_unstemmed SUN-116 The Role of (68)Gallium DOTATATE PET/CT Versus (18)F-FDOPA PET/CT in the Imaging of Neuroendocrine Neoplasms in Patients with Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia Type 1 (MEN1)
title_short SUN-116 The Role of (68)Gallium DOTATATE PET/CT Versus (18)F-FDOPA PET/CT in the Imaging of Neuroendocrine Neoplasms in Patients with Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia Type 1 (MEN1)
title_sort sun-116 the role of (68)gallium dotatate pet/ct versus (18)f-fdopa pet/ct in the imaging of neuroendocrine neoplasms in patients with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (men1)
topic Tumor Biology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7207902/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1210/jendso/bvaa046.1364
work_keys_str_mv AT tepedeaisha sun116theroleof68galliumdotatatepetctversus18ffdopapetctintheimagingofneuroendocrineneoplasmsinpatientswithmultipleendocrineneoplasiatype1men1
AT leemaya sun116theroleof68galliumdotatatepetctversus18ffdopapetctintheimagingofneuroendocrineneoplasmsinpatientswithmultipleendocrineneoplasiatype1men1
AT welchjames sun116theroleof68galliumdotatatepetctversus18ffdopapetctintheimagingofneuroendocrineneoplasmsinpatientswithmultipleendocrineneoplasiatype1men1
AT mandladel sun116theroleof68galliumdotatatepetctversus18ffdopapetctintheimagingofneuroendocrineneoplasmsinpatientswithmultipleendocrineneoplasiatype1men1
AT bansalrashika sun116theroleof68galliumdotatatepetctversus18ffdopapetctintheimagingofneuroendocrineneoplasmsinpatientswithmultipleendocrineneoplasiatype1men1
AT cochrancraig sun116theroleof68galliumdotatatepetctversus18ffdopapetctintheimagingofneuroendocrineneoplasmsinpatientswithmultipleendocrineneoplasiatype1men1
AT agarwalsunitakishore sun116theroleof68galliumdotatatepetctversus18ffdopapetctintheimagingofneuroendocrineneoplasmsinpatientswithmultipleendocrineneoplasiatype1men1
AT simondswilliamf sun116theroleof68galliumdotatatepetctversus18ffdopapetctintheimagingofneuroendocrineneoplasmsinpatientswithmultipleendocrineneoplasiatype1men1
AT weinsteinleescott sun116theroleof68galliumdotatatepetctversus18ffdopapetctintheimagingofneuroendocrineneoplasmsinpatientswithmultipleendocrineneoplasiatype1men1
AT millocorinamadalina sun116theroleof68galliumdotatatepetctversus18ffdopapetctintheimagingofneuroendocrineneoplasmsinpatientswithmultipleendocrineneoplasiatype1men1
AT sadowskisamira sun116theroleof68galliumdotatatepetctversus18ffdopapetctintheimagingofneuroendocrineneoplasmsinpatientswithmultipleendocrineneoplasiatype1men1
AT blaujenny sun116theroleof68galliumdotatatepetctversus18ffdopapetctintheimagingofneuroendocrineneoplasmsinpatientswithmultipleendocrineneoplasiatype1men1