Cargando…

Patient reported postoperative pain with a smartphone application: A proof of concept

Postoperative pain management and pain assessment are still lacking the perspective of the patient. We have developed and studied a prototype smartphone application for patients to self-record postoperative pain. The main objective was to collect patient and stakeholder critique of improvements on t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Thiel, Bram, Godfried, Marc B., van Huizen, Elise C., Mooijer, Bart C., de Boer, Bouke A., van Mierlo, Rover A. A. M., van Os, Johan, Geerts, Bart F., Kalkman, Cor J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7209286/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32384103
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0232082
_version_ 1783531042643116032
author Thiel, Bram
Godfried, Marc B.
van Huizen, Elise C.
Mooijer, Bart C.
de Boer, Bouke A.
van Mierlo, Rover A. A. M.
van Os, Johan
Geerts, Bart F.
Kalkman, Cor J.
author_facet Thiel, Bram
Godfried, Marc B.
van Huizen, Elise C.
Mooijer, Bart C.
de Boer, Bouke A.
van Mierlo, Rover A. A. M.
van Os, Johan
Geerts, Bart F.
Kalkman, Cor J.
author_sort Thiel, Bram
collection PubMed
description Postoperative pain management and pain assessment are still lacking the perspective of the patient. We have developed and studied a prototype smartphone application for patients to self-record postoperative pain. The main objective was to collect patient and stakeholder critique of improvements on the usability in order to develop a definitive version. The secondary objective was to investigate if patient self-recording compared to nurse-led assessment is a suitable method for postoperative pain management. Fifty patients and a stakeholder group consisting of ten healthcare- and ICT professionals and two members of the patient council participated in this study. MAIN OUTCOME: Thirty patients (60%) found it satisfying or very satisfying to communicate their pain with the app. Pain experienced after surgery was scored by patients as ‘no’: 3 (6%), ‘little’: 5 (10%), ‘bearable’: 25 (50%), ‘considerable’: 13 (26%) and ‘severe’: 1 (2%). Forty-five patients (90%) were positive about the ease of recording. Forty-five patients (90%) could correctly record their pain with the app. Thirty-eight patients (76%) agreed that in-app notifications to record pain were useful. Two patients (4%) were too ill to use the application. Based on usability feedback, we will redesign the pain intensity wheel and the in-app pain chart to improve clarity for patients to understand the course of their pain. SECONDARY OUTCOMES: The median patient recorded pain app score 4.0 (range 0 to 10) and nurse recorded numerical rating scale (NRS) for pain NRS 4.0 (range 0 to 9) were not statistically different (p = 0.06). Forty-two percent from a total of 307 patient pain app scores were ≥ 5 (on a scale from 0 no pain at all to 10 worst imaginable pain). Of these, 83% were recorded as ‘bearable’ while only in 18% of the recordings patients asked for additional analgesia. The results suggest that self-recording the severity of postoperative pain by patients with a smartphone application could be useful for postoperative pain management. The application was perceived as user-friendly and had high satisfaction rates from both patients and stakeholders. Further research is needed to validate the 11-point numeric and faces pain scale with the current gold standards visual analogue scale (VAS) and NRS for pain.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7209286
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72092862020-05-12 Patient reported postoperative pain with a smartphone application: A proof of concept Thiel, Bram Godfried, Marc B. van Huizen, Elise C. Mooijer, Bart C. de Boer, Bouke A. van Mierlo, Rover A. A. M. van Os, Johan Geerts, Bart F. Kalkman, Cor J. PLoS One Research Article Postoperative pain management and pain assessment are still lacking the perspective of the patient. We have developed and studied a prototype smartphone application for patients to self-record postoperative pain. The main objective was to collect patient and stakeholder critique of improvements on the usability in order to develop a definitive version. The secondary objective was to investigate if patient self-recording compared to nurse-led assessment is a suitable method for postoperative pain management. Fifty patients and a stakeholder group consisting of ten healthcare- and ICT professionals and two members of the patient council participated in this study. MAIN OUTCOME: Thirty patients (60%) found it satisfying or very satisfying to communicate their pain with the app. Pain experienced after surgery was scored by patients as ‘no’: 3 (6%), ‘little’: 5 (10%), ‘bearable’: 25 (50%), ‘considerable’: 13 (26%) and ‘severe’: 1 (2%). Forty-five patients (90%) were positive about the ease of recording. Forty-five patients (90%) could correctly record their pain with the app. Thirty-eight patients (76%) agreed that in-app notifications to record pain were useful. Two patients (4%) were too ill to use the application. Based on usability feedback, we will redesign the pain intensity wheel and the in-app pain chart to improve clarity for patients to understand the course of their pain. SECONDARY OUTCOMES: The median patient recorded pain app score 4.0 (range 0 to 10) and nurse recorded numerical rating scale (NRS) for pain NRS 4.0 (range 0 to 9) were not statistically different (p = 0.06). Forty-two percent from a total of 307 patient pain app scores were ≥ 5 (on a scale from 0 no pain at all to 10 worst imaginable pain). Of these, 83% were recorded as ‘bearable’ while only in 18% of the recordings patients asked for additional analgesia. The results suggest that self-recording the severity of postoperative pain by patients with a smartphone application could be useful for postoperative pain management. The application was perceived as user-friendly and had high satisfaction rates from both patients and stakeholders. Further research is needed to validate the 11-point numeric and faces pain scale with the current gold standards visual analogue scale (VAS) and NRS for pain. Public Library of Science 2020-05-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7209286/ /pubmed/32384103 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0232082 Text en © 2020 Thiel et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Thiel, Bram
Godfried, Marc B.
van Huizen, Elise C.
Mooijer, Bart C.
de Boer, Bouke A.
van Mierlo, Rover A. A. M.
van Os, Johan
Geerts, Bart F.
Kalkman, Cor J.
Patient reported postoperative pain with a smartphone application: A proof of concept
title Patient reported postoperative pain with a smartphone application: A proof of concept
title_full Patient reported postoperative pain with a smartphone application: A proof of concept
title_fullStr Patient reported postoperative pain with a smartphone application: A proof of concept
title_full_unstemmed Patient reported postoperative pain with a smartphone application: A proof of concept
title_short Patient reported postoperative pain with a smartphone application: A proof of concept
title_sort patient reported postoperative pain with a smartphone application: a proof of concept
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7209286/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32384103
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0232082
work_keys_str_mv AT thielbram patientreportedpostoperativepainwithasmartphoneapplicationaproofofconcept
AT godfriedmarcb patientreportedpostoperativepainwithasmartphoneapplicationaproofofconcept
AT vanhuizenelisec patientreportedpostoperativepainwithasmartphoneapplicationaproofofconcept
AT mooijerbartc patientreportedpostoperativepainwithasmartphoneapplicationaproofofconcept
AT deboerboukea patientreportedpostoperativepainwithasmartphoneapplicationaproofofconcept
AT vanmierloroveraam patientreportedpostoperativepainwithasmartphoneapplicationaproofofconcept
AT vanosjohan patientreportedpostoperativepainwithasmartphoneapplicationaproofofconcept
AT geertsbartf patientreportedpostoperativepainwithasmartphoneapplicationaproofofconcept
AT kalkmancorj patientreportedpostoperativepainwithasmartphoneapplicationaproofofconcept